RESUMO

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the active range of motion in patients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis to healthy controls. A secondary objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of using wearable motion sensors in a clinical setting. Methods: Asymptomatic controls and patients with radiographic and clinical evidence of thumb CMC joint arthritis were recruited. The experimental setup allowed participants to rest their forearm in neutral pronosupination with immobilization of the second through fifth CMC joints. An electromagnetic motion sensor was embedded into a thumb interphalangeal joint immobilizer, and participants were asked to complete continuous thumb circumduction movements. Data were continuously recorded, and circumduction curves were created based on degrees of motion. Peak thumb abduction and extension angles were also extracted from the data. Results: A total of 29 extremities with thumb CMC arthritis and 18 asymptomatic extremities were analyzed. Bilateral disease was present in 64% of patients. Patient age range was 35-83 years, and the control group age range was 26-83 years. The most affected extremities had Eaton stage 3 disease (38%, N = 11). The average maximum thumb abduction was 53.9° ± 19.6° in affected extremities and 70.8° ± 10.1° for controls. Average maximum thumb extension was 50.0° ± 15.2° in affected extremities and 58.4° ± 9.1° for controls. When comparing patients with Eaton stage 3 and 4 disease to controls, average maximum abduction and extension decreased with increasing disease stage (42.3°, 46.1°, and 70.8° for abduction, respectively, and 58.4°, 43.3°, and 41.3° for extension, respectively). Conclusions: We observed more severe motion limitations with increasing Eaton stage, and statistically significant differences were seen with stage 3 and 4 disease. A wearable motion sensor using a portable experimental setup was used to obtain measurements in a clinical setting. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic II.

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Currently, numerous assessment tools are available to measure functional outcomes after bilateral hand transplantation. The purpose of this article is to present our experience utilizing quantitative assessment tools for functional evaluation and to describe our results after bilateral hand transplantation. METHODS: A single surgeon's experience with bilateral hand transplantation from 2011 to 2016 was retrospectively reviewed. Three bilateral hand transplantations were performed in 2 adults and 1 child. A minimum 2-year follow-up evaluation was available. For the adult patients, postoperative outcome measures included patient-reported pain and disability scores, return of sensation, muscle strength, range of motion, and return to work/activities of daily living, the Hand Transplant Scoring System (HTSS), the Sollerman hand function test, and complications. For our pediatric patient, postoperative outcome measures included the Functional Independence Measure for children (WeeFIM) scale, a functional independence measure for children, the 9-Hole Peg Test, the Box and Block test, and complications. RESULTS: Our 2 adult patients were age 28 and our pediatric patient was age 8 at transplantation. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 7 years. The functional assessments were performed over a period from 11 to 48 months after transplantation. Both adult patients achieved functional independence and the HTSS, Short Form-36 Health Score (SF-36), DASH, and Sollerman tests demonstrated sequential improvement compared with pretransplantation scores assessed with the use of prostheses. Our pediatric patient demonstrated improvement in his Box and Block test score for each hand at sequential visits after transplantation. His 9-Hole Peg Test demonstrated improvement, and his WeeFIM assessment at 20 months indicated a greater level of independence. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcomes and the Sollerman test when used in addition to the HTSS appear to reflect functional improvement in adult patients after bilateral hand transplantation. Although children pose a unique challenge with functional assessment, we found the WeeFIM assessment, 9-Hole Peg Test, and the Box and Block test helpful in evaluating functional outcomes in our pediatric patient. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Shoulder dystocia is the strongest known risk factor for brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP). Fractures of the clavicle are known to occur in the setting of shoulder dystocia. It remains unknown whether a clavicle fracture that occurs during a birth delivery with shoulder dystocia increases the risk of BPBP or, alternatively, is protective. The purpose of this study was to use a large, national database to determine whether a clavicle fracture in the setting of shoulder dystocia is associated with an increased or decreased risk of BPBP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 1997 to 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was analyzed for this study. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes were used to identify newborns diagnosed with shoulder dystocia and BPBP as well as a concurrent fracture of the clavicle. Newborns with shoulder dystocia were stratified into 2 groups: dystocia without a clavicle fracture and dystocia with a clavicle fracture. Multivariable logistic regression was used to quantify the risk for BPBP among shoulder dystocia subgroups. RESULTS: The dataset included 5,564,628 sample births extrapolated to 23,385,597 population births over the 16-year study period. A BPBP occurred at a rate of 1.2 per 1,000 births. Shoulder dystocia complicated 18.8% of births with a BPBP. A total of 7.84% of newborns with a BPBP also sustained a clavicle fracture. Births with shoulder dystocia and a clavicle fracture incurred BPBP at a rate similar to that for newborns with shoulder dystocia and no fracture (9.82% vs 11.77%). Shoulder dystocia without a concurrent clavicle fracture was an independent risk factor for BPBP (odds ratio, 112.1; 95% confidence interval, 103.5-121.4). Those with shoulder dystocia and clavicle fracture had a risk for BPBP comparable with those with shoulder dystocia but no fracture (odds ratio, 126.7 vs 112.1). CONCLUSIONS: This population-level investigation suggests that, among newborns with shoulder dystocia, clavicle fracture is not associated with a significant change in the risk of BPBP. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Assuntos