RESUMO
UNLABELLED: The lichen Cladonia verticillaris produces bioactive secondary metabolites, such as fumarprotocetraric (FUM) and protocetraric acids. Species of the genus Cladonia demonstrate anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic activities and have been used in folk medicine to treat respiratory diseases (throat irritation, cough, asthma and tuberculosis). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the expectorant and mucolytic activities of fumarprotocetraric acid in albino Swiss mice. FUM was extracted and purified from an acetone extract of C. verticillaris. The phenol red quantification method was used on the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid following the administration of FUM (25, 50 or 100 mg/kg orally or intraduodenally and 12.5, 25 or 50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) for the evaluation of expectorant activity. Control groups received either saline solution (7.5 mL/kg) or ambroxol (1 mg/kg) through the same administration routes. Antioxidant activity was evaluated using the thiobarbituric acid reactive species assay in mouse lung tissue treated with the FUM at 25, 50 or 100 mg/kg orally, followed by a lipopolysaccharide solution at 1 mg/kg intrapleurally. The same protocol was used for the control groups using either saline solution (7.5 mL/kg, orally) or N-acetylcysteine (20 mg/kg, orally). RESULTS: Orally administered FUM at doses of 25 and 50 mg/kg promoted significantly greater dose-dependent phenol red activity in the bronchoalveolar lavage and expectorant activity in comparison to the controls (p < 0.05). Lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde equivalent) was reduced by 50% in the lung tissue. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the expectorant and antioxidant properties of fumarprotocetraric acid produced by the lichen C. verticillaris.
Assuntos
Antioxidantes/farmacologia , Ascomicetos/metabolismo , Expectorantes/farmacologia , Fumaratos/farmacologia , Administração Oral , Animais , Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Antioxidantes/isolamento & purificação , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Expectorantes/administração & dosagem , Expectorantes/isolamento & purificação , Fumaratos/administração & dosagem , Fumaratos/isolamento & purificação , Peroxidação de Lipídeos/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Camundongos , Metabolismo Secundário , Substâncias Reativas com Ácido Tiobarbitúrico/metabolismoRESUMO
O objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar um estudo bacteriológico comparativo entre os sistemas de umidificação aquoso aquecido (UAA) e filtro trocador de calor e umidade (FTCU) quanto à colonização bacteriana e a incidência de infecção respiratória em pacientes submetidos à ventilação mecânica (VM). Trata-se de uma pesquisa prospectiva, controlada e randomizada, na qual 15 pacientes internados na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) foram distribuídos em dois grupos. O primeiro fez uso de UAA (n=7) e o outro de FTCU (n=8). Foram coletadas amostras da secreção traqueal, condensado do circuito e FTCU na admissão do paciente, no quarto e oitavo dias, e realizada análise bacteriológica dos mesmos. Quanto às características antropométricas, não observou-se diferenças entre os grupos estudados. A prevalência de pneumonia associada à ventilação (PAV) foi de 57,1% no UAA e 62,5% no FTCU. Ao realizar a análise bacteriológica quantitativa entre eles, não foram observadas variações, sugerindo não haver diferença na prevenção de PAV entre os sistemas de umidificação; porém a presença das mesmas bactérias na secreção traqueal e no condensado e ausência destas na membrana do FTCU podem indicar que a principal fonte de contaminação é o próprio paciente.
The aim of this study was to conduct a bacteriological research comparing the aqueous heated humidification systems (HH) and filter heat and moisture exchanger (FHME) and to bacterial colonization and the incidence of respiratory infection in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. It is a prospective, controlled trial, in that 15 intensive care unit (ICU) patients were divided into two groups. The first made use of HH (n=7) and the other, FHME (n=8). We collected samples of tracheal secretions, and condensate circuit FHME at admission in the fourth and eighth day and bacteriological analysis of the same place. Regarding the anthropometric characteristics, no differences were observed between the groups. The prevalence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) was 57.1% in the HH and 62.5% in FHME. When performing quantitative bacteriological analysis between the group and HH and FHME, differences were not observed, suggesting no variation in the prevention of VAP between the humidification systems, but the presence of these bacteria in the tracheal and condensate and in the absence of these membrane FHME may indicate that the main source of contamination is the patient himself.
RESUMO
OBJETIVO: A pesquisa foi conduzida de maneira a se esclarecer, através de uma meta-análise, as evidências da suplementação de antioxidantes como terapia adjuvante na prevenção dos danos oxidativos e melhora do desfecho clínico, tais como mortalidade, tempo de hospitalização e ventilação mecânica. MÉTODOS: A estratégia de busca de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) envolveu a participação de dois pesquisadores que avaliaram, de forma independente, a qualidade metodológica de cada artigo, disponível full text, nas bases de dados PubMed, ISI of Knowledge e ScienceDirect. RESULTADOS: Foram extraídos 110 estudos dos últimos 10 anos, porém somente 30 artigos preencheram os critérios metodológicos (ensaios controlados, randomizados, cego e estatisticamente significativo), totalizando 241 animais e 256 pacientes. Este trabalho encontrou um OR de 0,45 [intervalo de confiança (IC) 95 por cento: 0,26 - 0,79] para a mortalidade na comparação do grupo experimental com placebo (6 estudos, n = 256), um OR de de 0,46 [intervalo de confiança (IC) 95 por cento: 0,26 - 0,87] para tempo de hospitalização e um OR de 0,63 [intervalo de confiança (IC) 95 por cento: 0,35 - 1,12] para o tempo de ventilação mecânica assistida entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: As evidências são conflitantes e, desta forma, ainda não é possível recomendar o uso rotineiro da suplementação com antioxidantes em pacientes criticamente enfermos.
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the evidence supporting antioxidant supplementation as an adjunct therapy to prevent oxidative damage and improve the clinical outcomes (mortality, length of hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation). METHODS: The search strategy for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involved the participation of two researchers who independently assessed the methodological quality of each full-text article that was available in the PubMed, ISI WEB of Knowledge and ScienceDirect databases. RESULTS: We extracted 110 studies from the past 10 years, but only 30 articles met the methodological criteria (RCT, blinded and statistically significant results), for a total of 241 animals and 256 patients. This study found an odds ratio (OR) of 0.45 [95 percent confidence interval (CI): 0.26 to 0.79] for death in the experimental group compared with placebo (six trials, n = 256), an OR of 0.46 [95 percent CI: 0.26 to 0.87] for hospitalization time and an OR of 0.63 [95 percent CI: 0.35 to 1.12] for mechanical ventilation time between groups. CONCLUSION: Conflicting evidence makes it impossible to recommend the routine use of antioxidant supplementation in critically ill patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the evidence supporting antioxidant supplementation as an adjunct therapy to prevent oxidative damage and improve the clinical outcomes (mortality, length of hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation). METHODS: The search strategy for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involved the participation of two researchers who independently assessed the methodological quality of each full-text article that was available in the PubMed, ISI WEB of Knowledge and ScienceDirect databases. RESULTS: We extracted 110 studies from the past 10 years, but only 30 articles met the methodological criteria (RCT, blinded and statistically significant results), for a total of 241 animals and 256 patients. This study found an odds ratio (OR) of 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26 to 0.79] for death in the experimental group compared with placebo (six trials, n = 256), an OR of 0.46 [95% CI: 0.26 to 0.87] for hospitalization time and an OR of 0.63 [95% CI: 0.35 to 1.12] for mechanical ventilation time between groups. CONCLUSION: Conflicting evidence makes it impossible to recommend the routine use of antioxidant supplementation in critically ill patients.