RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In recent years, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting has emerged as a valid tool for revascularization in a select group of patients with severe lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Here we report the clinical results using two devices designed by us to facilitate the harvesting of the left internal mammary artery up to its origin and to occlude and stabilize the left anterior descending coronary artery while placing the anastomosis. METHODS: From January 1996 to January 1998, 122 patients underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting in the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Favaloro Foundation. One hundred twelve patients received a single left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending coronary artery bypass graft, and in 10 patients, an additional bypass graft was performed. RESULTS: Most patients were discharged on day 2 or 3 after the procedure. Three patients (2.5%) had a perioperative myocardial infarction. The overall hospital mortality rate was 3.3% (4 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of team experience, more careful dissection of the left internal mammary artery up to its origin, and use of the stabilizer-occluder and interrupted suture technique for the anastomosis has markedly improved our results.
Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Técnicas de Sutura , Toracotomia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We analyzed in-hospital results of 87 patients undergoing minimally invasive valvular operations (right parasternal incision through third and fourth cartilages). METHODS: Age was 21 to 84 years (mean, 56.2 +/- 16); 45 patients (51.7%) were female. Five (5.7%) had a previous valvular operation and 8 (9.2%) had severe left ventricular dysfunction. Valve diseases were as follows: aortic in 35 patients (40.2%), mitral in 44 (50.5%), double in 5 (5.7%), tricuspid regurgitation in 2 (2.2%), and mitral periprosthetic leak in 1 (1.1%). RESULTS: Nineteen mitral repairs (21.9%), 22 replacements (25.3%), 1 leak closure (1.1%), 1 tricuspid repair (1.1%), and 1 replacement (1.1%) were performed. Thirty-one patients (35.7%) underwent aortic replacement, 2 (2.3%) aortic decalcification, 1 (1.1%) subaortic membrane resection, 4 (4.6%) a double-valve procedure, and 5 (5.7%) a single-valve operation combined with myocardial revascularization. In-hospital mortality was 5.7% (5 patients). Univariate analysis was significant for previous operation, New York Heart Association class IV and severe ventricular dysfunction. Multivariate analysis was significant for previous operation and severe ventricular dysfunction. Atrial fibrillation (12.6%) was the most frequent complication. Postoperative stay was 6.5 +/- 6 days. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive approach is a useful technique in valvular surgery. Patients with a previous valvular operation, severe ventricular dysfunction, and New York Heart Association class IV dyspnea have higher in-hospital mortality.