RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate blood creatinine and renal histology in rats anesthetized with S(+)-ketamine (keta) or dexmedetomidine (dex) and submitted to kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). METHODS: Under intraperitoneal (ip) S(+)-ketamine, 20 male Wistar rats were divided into two groups (n=10): maintenance with iv S(+)-ketamine or dex (keta and dex groups), and submitted to right (R) nephrectomy and left (L) renal artery clamping for 45 min. Blood creatinine was measured before ischemia (T1) and 48h after reperfusion (T2), when L nephrectomy was performed. Histological analysis was performed in all kidneys. RESULTS: Blood creatinine was significantly higher at T2 in both groups, but dex group results were lower than those of keta group. Histological changes: between groups, R kidneys did not differ; there were significant high scores for vascular dilation: keta L kidneys; for vascular congestion, tubular dilation, and necrosis: L kidneys from both groups; for tubular degeneration: keta R kidneys. CONCLUSION: S(+)-ketamine plus IRI were aggressive to rat kidneys, according to histological changes, and dexmedetomidine may have not totally protected the kidneys from these injuries, despite the better results of blood creatinine.
OBJETIVO: Investigar a creatinina sanguínea e histologia renal em ratos anestesiados com S(+)-cetamina (ceta) ou dexmedetomidina (dex) e submetidos à lesão de isquemia/reperfusão renal (IR). MÉTODOS: Sob S(+)-cetamina intraperitoneal (ip), 20 ratos Wistar machos foram distribuídos em dois grupos (n=10): manutenção com S(+)-cetamina ou dexmedetomidina, iv, (grupos ceta e dex), e submetidos à nefrectomia direita (D) e clampeamento da artéria renal esquerda (E) por 45 min. A creatinina sanguínea foi dosada antes da isquemia (T1) e 48h após a reperfusão (T2), quando foi realizada nefrectomia E. Houve análise histológica de todos os rins. RESULTADOS: A creatinina foi significativamente maior em T2 em ambos os grupos, porém menor com a dexmedetomidina. Alterações histológicas: entre grupos, os rins Ds não diferiram; houve escores altos significativos para dilatação vascular: rins Es do grupo ceta; para congestão vascular, dilatação tubular, necrose: rins Es de ambos os grupos; para degeneração tubular: rins Ds do grupo ceta. CONCLUSÃO: S(+)-cetamina e IR foram agressivas histologicamente para rins de ratos e a dexmedetomidina pode não ter protegido totalmente os rins dessas lesões, apesar dos melhores resultados de creatinina.
Assuntos
Animais , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Ratos/classificação , Ferimentos e Lesões/sangue , Nefrectomia/métodos , Rim/anatomia & histologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate blood creatinine and renal histology in rats anesthetized with S(+)-ketamine (keta) or dexmedetomidine (dex) and submitted to kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). METHODS: Under intraperitoneal (ip) S(+)-ketamine, 20 male Wistar rats were divided into two groups (n=10): maintenance with iv S(+)-ketamine or dex (keta and dex groups), and submitted to right (R) nephrectomy and left (L) renal artery clamping for 45 min. Blood creatinine was measured before ischemia (T1) and 48h after reperfusion (T2), when L nephrectomy was performed. Histological analysis was performed in all kidneys. RESULTS: Blood creatinine was significantly higher at T2 in both groups, but dex group results were lower than those of keta group. Histological changes: between groups, R kidneys did not differ; there were significant high scores for vascular dilation: keta L kidneys; for vascular congestion, tubular dilation, and necrosis: L kidneys from both groups; for tubular degeneration: keta R kidneys. CONCLUSION: S(+)-ketamine plus IRI were aggressive to rat kidneys, according to histological changes, and dexmedetomidine may have not totally protected the kidneys from these injuries, despite the better results of blood creatinine.(AU)
OBJETIVO: Investigar a creatinina sanguínea e histologia renal em ratos anestesiados com S(+)-cetamina (ceta) ou dexmedetomidina (dex) e submetidos à lesão de isquemia/reperfusão renal (IR). MÉTODOS: Sob S(+)-cetamina intraperitoneal (ip), 20 ratos Wistar machos foram distribuídos em dois grupos (n=10): manutenção com S(+)-cetamina ou dexmedetomidina, iv, (grupos ceta e dex), e submetidos à nefrectomia direita (D) e clampeamento da artéria renal esquerda (E) por 45 min. A creatinina sanguínea foi dosada antes da isquemia (T1) e 48h após a reperfusão (T2), quando foi realizada nefrectomia E. Houve análise histológica de todos os rins. RESULTADOS: A creatinina foi significativamente maior em T2 em ambos os grupos, porém menor com a dexmedetomidina. Alterações histológicas: entre grupos, os rins Ds não diferiram; houve escores altos significativos para dilatação vascular: rins Es do grupo ceta; para congestão vascular, dilatação tubular, necrose: rins Es de ambos os grupos; para degeneração tubular: rins Ds do grupo ceta. CONCLUSÃO: S(+)-cetamina e IR foram agressivas histologicamente para rins de ratos e a dexmedetomidina pode não ter protegido totalmente os rins dessas lesões, apesar dos melhores resultados de creatinina.(AU)
Assuntos
Animais , Ratos/classificação , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Ferimentos e Lesões/sangue , Rim/anatomia & histologia , Nefrectomia/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate blood creatinine and renal histology in rats anesthetized with S(+)-ketamine (keta) or dexmedetomidine (dex) and submitted to kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). METHODS: Under intraperitoneal (ip) S(+)-ketamine, 20 male Wistar rats were divided into two groups (n=10): maintenance with iv S(+)-ketamine or dex (keta and dex groups), and submitted to right (R) nephrectomy and left (L) renal artery clamping for 45 min. Blood creatinine was measured before ischemia (T1) and 48h after reperfusion (T2), when L nephrectomy was performed. Histological analysis was performed in all kidneys. RESULTS: Blood creatinine was significantly higher at T2 in both groups, but dex group results were lower than those of keta group. Histological changes: between groups, R kidneys did not differ; there were significant high scores for vascular dilation: keta L kidneys; for vascular congestion, tubular dilation, and necrosis: L kidneys from both groups; for tubular degeneration: keta R kidneys. CONCLUSION: S(+)-ketamine plus IRI were aggressive to rat kidneys, according to histological changes, and dexmedetomidine may have not totally protected the kidneys from these injuries, despite the better results of blood creatinine.