RESUMO
We look at Brazilian collaboration in Scientific papers based on SciVal and Incites regarding the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations. Data were collected from InCites® and SciVal® (2012-2021). Groups of Global South countries were formed (ASEAN, Asia, Africa, BRICS, Caribbean, Central and Latin America). Analyses included Cluster (Author position, impact/citations, open access, journal quartil), principal component, path and analysis of variance to see the effect of region and SDGs in Brazilian publishing. Scopus data were analysed in Vosviewer® for creating country networks through publication, citation and bibliographic coupling, as well as keyword analysis. SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) dominates all Brazilian scientific collaborations with the various country groups. While gender equality shows greater importance in ASEAN and African countries, Life Below Water (SDG14), on Land (SDG15), and Climate Action (SDG13), are important in all regions. SDGs 1, 8, 10, 12, and 16 show less importance in this collaboration overall. Brazil is relatively more active in Zero Hunger (SDG2) and Life on Land (SDG15) than worldwide. Brazil South-South collaboration in published documents shows higher impact than North South in some areas. Collaboration priorities vary by region and triangulation with countries is high depending on language and region.
Assuntos
Bibliometria , Desenvolvimento Sustentável , Brasil , América Latina , ÁfricaRESUMO
To understand the urban territory through the analysis of Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) as a prerequisite for structuring a Healthy City Project. This research was characterized as a documentary survey through the Laws, Master Plan and Management Reports of the City of Maracanaú and in the Government Health Information Notebooks. The analysis took place through the reading and identification of what was about the SDOH, using Content Analysis. The results brought two categories of analysis that structured a diagnosis of the area, mapping the weaknesses found with regard to the SDOH analyzed, such as: population growth, mortality rate, urban violence, among others. It is believed that the diagnosis of the area carried out through the SDOH made it possible to identify the intervention points that can be used for the preparation of a Healthy City Project.
Compreender o território urbano por meio da análise dos Determinantes Sociais de Saúde (DSSs) como pressupostos para a estruturação de uma Agenda de Cidade Saudável. Esta pesquisa se caracterizou como um levantamento documental por meio das leis, plano diretor e relatórios de gestão da cidade de Maracanaú e nos cadernos de informação em saúde do governo. A análise se deu pela leitura e identificação do que versava sobre os DSSs, utilizando-se a análise de conteúdo. Os resultados trouxeram duas categorias de análise que estruturaram um diagnóstico do território, mapeando as fragilidades encontradas no que diz respeito aos DSSs analisados como crescimento demográfico, taxa de mortalidade, violência urbana, dentre outros. Acredita-se que o diagnóstico do território realizado por meio dos DSSs possibilitou identificar os pontos interventivos que possam ser utilizados para a preparação de uma agenda de cidade saudável.
RESUMO
Managing water for sustainable use and economic development is both a technical and a governance challenge in which knowledge production and sharing play a central role. This article evaluates and compares the role of participatory governance and scientific information in decision-making in four basins in Brazil, Mexico, Thailand, and the United States. Water management institutions in each of the basins have evolved during the last 10-20 years from a relatively centralized water-management structure at the state or national level to a decision structure that involves engaging water users within the basins and the development of participatory processes. This change is consistent with global trends in which states increasingly are expected to gain public acceptance for larger water projects and policy changes. In each case, expanded citizen engagement in identifying options and in decision-making processes has resulted in more complexity but also has expanded the culture of integrated learning. International funding for water infrastructure has been linked to requirements for participatory management processes, but, ironically, this study finds that participatory processes appear to work better in the context of decisions that are short-term and easily adjusted, such as water-allocation decisions, and do not work so well for longer-term, high-stakes decisions regarding infrastructure. A second important observation is that the costs of capacity building to allow meaningful stakeholder engagement in water-management decision processes are not widely recognized. Failure to appreciate the associated costs and complexities may contribute to the lack of successful engagement of citizens in decisions regarding infrastructure.