RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although working activities are associated with several pregnancy outcomes, there is scarce information regarding the association between working activities and low back pain (LBP) during pregnancy. This study aimed to investigate whether leisure-time and work-related physical activities during pregnancy are associated with LBP. METHODS: Data from the 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort study were used. Demographic, socioeconomic, gestational, leisure-time (prior to and during pregnancy) and work-related (days of work, hours of work, standing and heavy lifting) physical activity data were collected at birth. LPB was assessed in the 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Leisure-time physical activity either prior to and during pregnancy was not associated with LBP. Working during pregnancy, days of work and standing position at work were not associated with self-reported LBP during pregnancy. However, working more than 8 h per day and always lifting heavy objects at work increased the odds ratio for LBP (OR 1.30 95%CI: 1.04; 1.63; and OR: 1.39 95%CI 1.08; 1.81, respectively). In addition, women who had lifted heavy objects often/always, reported an increase in pain intensity. CONCLUSION: Working during pregnancy and days worked per week were not related to experiencing LBP. However, women who worked more than 8 h per day, as well as women who lifted heavy objects at work on a regular basis, were more likely to experience pregnancy-related LBP.
Assuntos
Dor Lombar , Estudos de Coortes , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Atividades de Lazer , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Atividade Motora , GravidezRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic with meta-analysis OBJECTIVES.: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of epidural corticosteroid injections compared with placebo injection in reducing leg pain and disability in patients with sciatica. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Conservative treatments, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments, are typically the first treatment options for sciatica but the evidence to support their use is limited. The overall quality of evidence found by previous systematic reviews varies between moderate and high, which suggests that future trials may change the conclusions. New placebo-controlled randomized trials have been published recently which highlights the importance of an updated systematic review. METHODS: The searches were performed without language restrictions in the following databases from 2012 to 25 September 2019: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and trial registers. We included placebo-controlled randomized trials investigating epidural corticosteroid injections in patients with sciatica. The primary outcomes were leg pain intensity and disability. The secondary outcomes were adverse events, overall pain, and back pain intensity. We grouped similar trials according to outcome measures and their respective follow-up time points. Short-term follow-up (>2 weeks but ≤3 months) was considered the primary follow-up time point due to the expected mechanism of action of epidural corticosteroid injection. Weighted mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. We assessed the overall quality of evidence using the GRADE approach and conducted the analyses using random effects. RESULTS: We included 25 clinical trials (from 29 publications) providing data for a total of 2470 participants with sciatica, an increase of six trials when compared to the previous review. Epidural corticosteroid injections were probably more effective than placebo in reducing short-term leg pain (MD -4.93, 95% CI -8.77 to -1.09 on a 0-100 scale), short-term disability (MD -4.18, 95% CI: -6.04 to -2.17 on a 0-100 scale) and may be slightly more effective in reducing short-term overall pain (MD -9.35, 95% CI -14.05 to -4.65 on a 0-100 scale). There were mostly minor adverse events (i.e., without hospitalization) after epidural corticosteroid injections and placebo injections without difference between groups (RR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.91-1.42). The quality of evidence was at best moderate mostly due to problems with trial design and inconsistency. CONCLUSION: A review of 25 placebo-controlled trials provides moderate-quality evidence that epidural corticosteroid injections are effective, although the effects are small and short-term. There is uncertainty on safety due to very low-quality evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Medição da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Ciática/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Injeções Epidurais , Dor/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Ciática/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that pelvic floor dysfunction may contribute to the development of lumbopelvic pain as a result of changes in trunk muscle control. However, there is limited evidence that pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) can improve clinical outcomes in women with lumbopelvic pain. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of PFMT to other conservative interventions (usual physiotherapy care or minimal intervention), no treatment or placebo interventions on pain and disability in women with lumbopelvic pain. RESULTS: We included eight RCTs totalling 469 participants. PFMT was more effective than minimal intervention for lumbopelvic pain [mean difference (MD) 15.9/100 (95% confidential interval (CI), 8.2 to 23.6; p = 0.00; I2 = 3.92%)] and disability [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.5 (95% CI 0.1-0.9; p = 0.00; I2 = 0%)] during pregnancy. PFMT was more effective than usual physiotherapy care for pain (MD 11.7/100 [95% CI 7.5-15.9; p = 0.00; I2 = 94.14%]) and disability (SMD 0.3 (95% CI 0.0-0.6; p = 0.01; I2 = 82.54%]) in non-pregnant women. Effect sizes were in general of arguable clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the certainty of the evidence was very low to low. There is no conclusive evidence that the addition of PFMT to usual physiotherapy care or minimal intervention is superior to minimal intervention and usual care alone given the small number of studies and high levels of heterogeneity of included studies. Further well-designed trials are needed to establish the effectiveness of PFMT for lumbopelvic pain in women.
Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício , Diafragma da Pelve , Feminino , Humanos , Dor , GravidezRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To investigate whether engagement in leisure-time physical activity before or during pregnancy is associated with low back pain (LBP) outcomes during pregnancy and postpartum prevalence of LBP in women who reported LBP during pregnancy. METHODS: Data from the 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study, were used. Demographic, socioeconomic, and gestational characteristics, as well as physical activity prior to and during pregnancy were recorded at perinatal assessment. LBP outcomes during pregnancy (pain intensity, activity limitation, and care seeking) and postpartum (prevalence of LBP) were collected at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Pain intensity, care seeking, and prevalence of LBP postpartum period were not associated with physical activity either before or during pregnancy. However, women engaged in physical activity during pregnancy and at least for 2 trimesters had lower odds ratio of activity limitation associated with LBP during pregnancy (odds ratio: 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.88; odds ratio: 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.86, respectively). CONCLUSION: Meeting the recommended levels of physical activity during pregnancy is associated with less activity limitation related to LBP during pregnancy. However, physical activity levels, either before or during pregnancy, were not associated with pain intensity, care seeking, and postpartum LBP.
Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Gestantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atividade Motora , Vigilância da População , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate associations between anthropometric measures (birthweight, weight gain and current BMI) and back pain; and to determine whether these associations differ between those born with low or full birthweight. METHODS: The cross-sectional associations between the lifetime prevalence of back pain and anthropometric measures (birthweight, weight gain and current BMI) among 2754 adult twins were investigated in three stages: total sample; within-pair case-control for monozygotic and dizygotic twins together; and within-pair case-control analysis separated by dizygotic and monozygotic. Results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Birthweight was not associated with back pain (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.99-1.00), but a weak association was found between weight gain (OR 1.01; CI 1.00-1.01) or current BMI (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.05) and back pain in the total sample analysis. These associations did not remain significant after adjusting for genetics. The associations did not differ between those whose were born with low or full birthweight. CONCLUSION: Birthweight was not associated with prevalence of back pain in adulthood. Weight gain and current BMI were weakly associated with back pain prevalence in the total sample analysis but did not differ between those born with low or full birthweight. However, the small-magnitude association only just achieved significance and appeared to be confounded by genetics and the early shared environment. Our results suggest that a direct link between these predictors and back pain in adults is unlikely. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Assuntos
Dor nas Costas/etiologia , Peso ao Nascer/fisiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Aumento de Peso/fisiologia , Adulto , Antropometria/métodos , Austrália/epidemiologia , Dor nas Costas/epidemiologia , Dor nas Costas/genética , Dor nas Costas/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Gêmeos Dizigóticos , Gêmeos MonozigóticosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlates of a recent history of disabling low back pain (LBP) in older persons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Pain in the Elderly (PAINEL) Study was derived from the Frailty among Brazilian Older Adults (FIBRA) Network Study. Data were collected through face-to-face/telephone interviews and clinical examination. A series of logistic regressions assessed associations between a recent history of disabling LBP and sociodemographic, physical/lifestyle, and psychological factors. RESULTS: Of the 378 community-dwelling elders included in the study (age±SD, 75.5±6.1), 9.3% experienced LBP that was bad enough to limit or change their daily activities during the past year. Those reporting a recent history of disabling LBP were more likely to be women and under financial strain, to present poor self-rated health, overweight, multimorbidity, low physical activity level, fatigue, depressive symptomatology/diagnosis and fear beliefs, and to report decreased sleep time, prolonged sitting time, chronic pain (in location other than lower back), and frequently recurring LBP. The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that overweight (odds ratio [OR], 29.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-391.0), low physical activity level (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.3-15.4), fatigue (OR, 10.3; 95% CI, 2.4-43.4), depression diagnosis (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.3-18.4), and frequently recurring LBP (OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.0-20.1) were independently associated with a recent history of disabling LBP. DISCUSSION: Our study supports the link between disabling LBP and other age-related chronic conditions in a middle-income country with a rapidly aging population.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Pessoas com Deficiência , Avaliação Geriátrica , Dor Lombar/complicações , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Vida Independente , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Testes PsicológicosRESUMO
Background: although back pain is most prevalent in older adults, there is a paucity of studies investigating back pain in older people. Our objective was to characterize and compare Brazilian and Dutch older adults presenting to primary care with a new episode of back pain. We also aimed to investigate whether socio-demographic characteristics were associated with pain severity and disability. Methods: we sourced data on 602 Brazilian and 675 Dutch participants aged ≥55 years with a new episode of back pain from the Back Complaints in the Elders consortium. We analyzed country differences in participants' characteristics, and associations between socio-demographic/clinical characteristics and pain severity and pain-related disability. Results: the two populations differed in most characteristics. More Dutch participants were smokers, heavy drinkers, and reported back stiffness. More Brazilian participants were less educated, had higher prevalence of comorbidities; higher levels of pain intensity, disability and psychological distress. When controlling for the effect of country, being female and having altered quality of sleep were associated with higher pain intensity. Altered quality of sleep, having two or more comorbidities and physical inactivity were associated with higher disability. Higher educational levels were negatively associated with both pain and disability outcomes. Conclusions: back pain is disabling in the older population. Our country comparison has shown that country of residence is an important determinant of higher disability and pain in older people with back pain. Irrespective of country, women with poor sleep quality, comorbidities, low education and who are physically inactive report more severe symptoms.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Dor nas Costas/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Dor nas Costas/diagnóstico , Brasil/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Manejo da Dor , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Sedentário , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate a range of transient risk factors for an episode of sudden-onset, acute low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This case-crossover study recruited 999 subjects with a new episode of acute LBP between October 2011 and November 2012 from 300 primary care clinics in Sydney, Australia. Each participant was asked to report exposure to 12 putative triggers over the 96 hours preceding the onset of back pain. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) expressing the magnitude of increased risk with exposure to each trigger. RESULTS: Exposure to a range of physical and psychosocial triggers significantly increased the risk of a new onset of LBP; ORs ranged from 2.7 (moderate or vigorous physical activity) to 25.0 (distracted during an activity or task). Age moderated the effect of exposure to heavy loads and sexual activity. The ORs for heavy loads for people ages 20, 40, or 60 years were 13.6, 6.0, and 2.7, respectively. The risk of developing back pain was greatest between 7:00 AM and noon. CONCLUSION: Transient exposure to a number of modifiable physical and psychosocial triggers substantially increases risk for a new episode of LBP. Triggers previously evaluated in occupational injury studies, but never in LBP, have been shown to significantly increase risk. These results aid our understanding of the causes of LBP and can inform the development of new prevention approaches.
Assuntos
Dor Aguda/etiologia , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Dor Aguda/diagnóstico , Dor Aguda/fisiopatologia , Dor Aguda/prevenção & controle , Dor Aguda/psicologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Dor Lombar/prevenção & controle , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New South Wales , Razão de Chances , Medição da Dor , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of various weather conditions on risk of low back pain. METHODS: We conducted a case-crossover study in primary care clinics in Sydney, Australia. A total of 993 consecutive patients with a sudden, acute episode of back pain were recruited from October 2011 to November 2012. Following the pain onset, demographic and clinical data about the back pain episode were obtained for each participant during an interview. Weather parameters (temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, wind speed, wind gust, wind direction, and precipitation) were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology for the entire study period. Weather exposures in the case window (time when participants first noticed their back pain) were compared to exposures in 2 control time windows (same time duration, 1 week and 1 month before the case window). RESULTS: Temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, wind direction, and precipitation showed no association with onset of back pain. Higher wind speed (odds ratio [OR] 1.17 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.04-1.32], P = 0.01 for an increase of 11 km/hour) and wind gust (OR 1.14 [95% CI 1.02-1.28], P = 0.02 for an increase of 14 km/hour) increased the odds of pain onset. CONCLUSION: Weather parameters that have been linked to musculoskeletal pain such as temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, and precipitation do not increase the risk of a low back pain episode. Higher wind speed and wind gust speed provided a small increase in risk of back pain, and although this reached statistical significance, the magnitude of the increase was not clinically important.
Assuntos
Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Tempo (Meteorologia) , Adulto , Austrália , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Umidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Estações do Ano , Temperatura , VentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze changes in the recruitment of the muscles longus colli (Lco) and sternocledomastoid (SCM) as measured by ultrasonography in patients with chronic neck pain before and immediately after a single cervical Maitland's posterior-anterior central mobilization technique. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, case-control research design study. Ultrasonographic images of Lco and SCM were taken in 31 patients with chronic neck pain and matched controls during the 5 phases of the craniocervical flexion test before and after a Maitland's posterior-anterior central mobilization session at the cervical spine. Changes in muscle thickness during the test were calculated to infer muscle recruitment. Separate analysis of variance models for each muscle was built. RESULTS: Both groups showed increases in Lco and SCM recruitment between phases (F = 7.95, P < .001; F = 21.29, P < .001), with patients with chronic neck pain demonstrating lesser increases for Lco changes in thickness compared with controls, mainly at phase 5 (-0.09, P = .004; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.15). After the mobilization, Lco recruitment increased more significantly in patients with chronic neck pain, and previous difference between groups in phase 5 was no longer significant (-0.07, P = .07; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.01). The SCM recruitment decreased in phase 1 for patients with chronic neck pain (P = .01; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01). CONCLUSION: Cervical mobilization appeared to modulate neck muscles function by increasing deep muscle and reducing superficial muscles recruitment.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Manipulação da Coluna/métodos , Debilidade Muscular/diagnóstico por imagem , Debilidade Muscular/microbiologia , Músculos do Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Debilidade Muscular/fisiopatologia , Músculos do Pescoço/fisiopatologia , Cervicalgia/diagnóstico por imagem , Exame Neurológico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are no clinimetrically tested instruments for measuring attitudes and beliefs of health care providers with regards to chronic low back pain in Brazil. OBJECTIVES: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS.PT) into Brazilian-Portuguese and to test the clinimetric properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) and the PABS.PT. METHODS: The PABS.PT was cross-culturally adapted following the recommendations of current guidelines. The PABS.PT and the HC-PAIRS were clinimetrically tested in 100 physical therapists who routinely treat patients with low back pain in their clinical practice. The internal consistency, construct validity and ceiling and floor effects were tested using only baseline values from the participants while reproducibility was evaluated in a test-retest design with a seven-day interval. RESULTS: Both scales demonstrated adequate levels of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.67 to 0.74). Their reproducibility ranged from moderate to substantial (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient2,1 ranging from 0.70 to 0.84; Standard Error of the Measurement ranging from 3.48 to 5.06). The validity coefficients of the scales ranged from weak to moderate (Pearson's correlation coefficient ranging from 0.19 to 0.62). No ceiling or floor effects were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that both PABS.PT and HC-PAIRS are reproducible scales for the measurement of attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain in Brazilian physical therapists.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cultura , Dor Lombar , Especialidade de Fisioterapia , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO: Não existem instrumentos clinimetricamente testados que mensuram atitudes e crenças de profissionais de saúde sobre a dor lombar crônica no Brasil. OBJETIVOS: Traduzir e adaptar transculturalmente a escala Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS.PT) para o português-brasileiro e avaliar as propriedades clinimétricas das versões em português-brasileiro da Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) e da PABS.PT. MÉTODOS: A PABS.PT foi adaptada transculturalmente seguindo recomendações das diretrizes existentes. Em seguida, as versões em português-brasileiro da PABS.PT e da HC-PAIRS foram clinimetricamente testadas em 100 fisioterapeutas que rotineiramente trabalhavam com pacientes portadores de dor lombar em sua prática clínica. A consistência interna, validade do construto e efeitos de teto e piso foram testados utilizando somente as respostas dos participantes na linha de base do estudo, e a reprodutibilidade foi testada em um delineamento de teste-reteste com intervalo de sete dias. RESULTADOS: Os instrumentos apresentaram valores adequados de consistência interna (Alfa de Cronbach variando entre 0,67 e 0,74). Sua reprodutibilidade variou de moderada a substancial (Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse tipo 2,1 variando entre 0,70 e 0,84; Erro-Padrão da Medida variando entre 3,48 e 5,06). Os índices de correlação entre os instrumentos variaram de fraco a moderado (Índice de Correlação de Pearson variando entre 0,19 e 0,62). Não foram detectados efeitos de teto e piso nos instrumentos. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados do presente estudo indicam que ambas as escalas PABS.PT e HC-PAIRS são instrumentos reprodutíveis para mensurar as atitudes e crenças relacionadas à dor lombar crônica em profissionais de saúde brasileiros.
BACKGROUND: There are no clinimetrically tested instruments for measuring attitudes and beliefs of health care providers with regards to chronic low back pain in Brazil. OBJECTIVES: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS.PT) into Brazilian-Portuguese and to test the clinimetric properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) and the PABS.PT. METHODS: The PABS.PT was cross-culturally adapted following the recommendations of current guidelines. The PABS.PT and the HC-PAIRS were clinimetrically tested in 100 physical therapists who routinely treat patients with low back pain in their clinical practice. The internal consistency, construct validity and ceiling and floor effects were tested using only baseline values from the participants while reproducibility was evaluated in a test-retest design with a seven-day interval. RESULTS: Both scales demonstrated adequate levels of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.67 to 0.74). Their reproducibility ranged from moderate to substantial (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient2,1 ranging from 0.70 to 0.84; Standard Error of the Measurement ranging from 3.48 to 5.06). The validity coefficients of the scales ranged from weak to moderate (Pearson's correlation coefficient ranging from 0.19 to 0.62). No ceiling or floor effects were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that both PABS.PT and HC-PAIRS are reproducible scales for the measurement of attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain in Brazilian physical therapists.
Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cultura , Dor Lombar , Especialidade de Fisioterapia , Doença Crônica , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
O objetivo da revisão foi avaliar a eficácia dos exercícios de controle motor nas dores lombares (DL) e pélvicas. O estudo foi uma revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos aleatorizados que investigaram a eficácia dos exercícios de controle motor no tratamento da DL e pélvica de várias populações. A eficácia desses exercícios foi sumarizada de acordo com os níveis de evidência empregados pela organização Cochrane. Oito ensaios cumpriram os critérios de inclusão. Há evidência limitada de que, a curto prazo, nos casos de DL aguda, exercícios de controle motor não sejam mais eficazes do que tratamento médico em diminuir dor e incapacidade. Entretanto, a longo prazo, há evidência limitada de que são capazes de reduzir o índice de recorrência nesses pacientes. Na DL crônica, existe forte evidência da eficácia dos exercícios de controle motor na diminuição da dor e incapacidade, quando comparados à fisioterapia convencional ou a nenhum tratamento. Há evidência limitada de que exercícios de controle motor sejam tão eficazes quanto a cirurgia de fusão lombar. Há evidência limitada de que, a curto e longo prazo, exercícios de controle motor sejam eficazes no tratamento das dores pélvicas pósparto.Assim, exercícios de controle motor não melhoram a dor e incapacidades nos casos agudos. No entanto, podem ser indicados como prevenção de recorrência e para indivíduos com quadros crônicos a fim de aliviar a dor, reduzir a incapacidade e melhorar a qualidade de vida...
The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of motor control exercises for low-back and pelvic pain. It covered randomized controlled trials (RCT) that assessed the efficacy of motor control exercises in the treatment of low-back and pelvic pain of different populations. The effectiveness of the exercises was summarized according to the Cochrane level of evidence criteria. Eight RCT fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There is limited evidence, in the short term, that motor control exercises be more effective than medical treatment to reduce pain and disability in acute low-back pain. In turn, in the long term, there is limited evidence that exercises reduce recurrence in these patients. For -back pain there is strong evidence that motor control exercises are more effective in reducing pain and disability than conventional physical therapy or no treatment. There is limited evidence that motor control exercises are as equally effective as lumbar fusion surgery. There is limited evidence, in the short and long term, that specific stabilization exercises are effective in treating pelvic pain after delivery. Thus, motor control exercises do not relieve pain and disability in the acute lowback pain. However, they can be prescribed for prevention and treatment of chronic cases, thus relieving pain, reducing disability and improving these patients quality of life...
Assuntos
Dor Lombar/reabilitação , Terapia por Exercício , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , Estabilização da Matéria Orgânica , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
QUESTION: Does health locus of control predict the smallest worthwhile effect of motor control exercise or spinal manipulative therapy when adjusted for severity of pain? DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: 86 people with non-specific low back pain who had not yet commenced physiotherapy intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictors were severity of pain measured over the last 7 days using an 11-point scale from 0 to 10, and external and internal health loci of control measured using Form C of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale. The outcome of interest was smallest worthwhile effect which was measured in terms of the percentage perceived change necessary to make two evidence-based physiotherapy interventions for non-specific low back pain (motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy) worthwhile. Data were collected before intervention commenced. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that when adjusted for pain and internal locus of control, external locus of control predicted the smallest worthwhile effect for motor control exercise (B 0.79; CI 0.10 to 1.48), explaining 0.07 of the variance. None of the predictors significantly predicted the smallest worthwhile effect for spinal manipulative therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with low back pain who have externalised beliefs and agree more strongly with the notion that others are responsible for their condition report higher estimates of smallest worthwhile effect of an active intervention such as motor control exercise than patients who do not have externalised beliefs.
Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício/psicologia , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Dor Lombar/reabilitação , Autoimagem , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
When quality of life questionnaires are used as measures of treatment outcomes, it is essential to know how well these can respond to clinical changes. The objective of this study is to examine the responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-Brazil) in subjects with chronic low back pain submitted to a physical therapy program. Thirty subjects with chronic low back pain completed the ODI-Brazil questionnaire, along with an 11-point pain visual analogue scale (Pain VAS), and the Brazilian-Portuguese version of Roland-Morris disability questionnaire before and after the program. All patients also completed a global perception of change Likert scale in condition after the program. This scale was collapsed to produce a dichotomous variable outcome: improved and non-improved. Responsiveness was determined using effect size statistics and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), with best cut-point analysis. The best change score cut-off was identified when equally balanced sensitivity and specificity was found, as an expression of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). After treatment, 19 patients considered themselves improved. Both the effect size (0.37) and the area under the ROC curve (0.73) for ODI-Brazil score in relation to global outcome after program indicated that the ODI-Brazil showed responsiveness. The ROC curve for ODI-Brazil was distributed at the upper corners of the diagonal line, indicating that the questionnaire presents discriminative ability. The best cut-off point for ODI-Brazil was approximately 4.45 points (63.2% sensitivity, 81.8% specificity). The Brazilian-Portuguese version of ODI has comparable responsiveness to other commonly used functional status measures and is appropriate for use in chronic low back pain patients receiving conservative care.
Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Brasil , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Portugal , Qualidade de Vida , Curva ROC , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Chronic cervical pain is a common source of disability in society, and evidence suggests that individuals with neck pain have impairment of the deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles. This study investigated the recruitment pattern of the neck muscles, particularly the DCF, during the Craniocervical Flexion Test (CCFT), using ultrasound measurement of muscle activity in asymptomatic subjects. In a cross-sectional design, 10 subjects, of both sexes, with no history of neck pain participated in the study. Participants were instructed to perform the CCFT, and changes in thickness from resting baseline values during the five incremental stages of the test were obtained for DCF and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles using ultrasonography. The most significant changes found in DCF thickness were between phase 1 and phases 4 (p<0.001) and 5 (p= <0.001). For SCM, differences were most significant between phases 1 and 3 (p<0.001), 4 (p<0.001), and 5 (p<0.001); and between phases 3 and 5 (p<0.003). No differences were found between DCF and SCM muscles. The present study confirms the evidence that CCFT increases DCF recruitment. However, the ultrasonography test protocol did not identify differences in recruitment between deep and superficial neck muscles. The present study confirms the evidence that the CCFT challenges the cervical spine and that DCF activity is increased during this maneuver.
RESUMO
Practice guidelines recommend various types of exercise and manipulative therapy for chronic back pain but there have been few head-to-head comparisons of these interventions. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare effects of general exercise, motor control exercise and manipulative therapy on function and perceived effect of intervention in patients with chronic back pain. Two hundred and forty adults with non-specific low back pain 3months were allocated to groups that received 8weeks of general exercise, motor control exercise or spinal manipulative therapy. General exercise included strengthening, stretching and aerobic exercises. Motor control exercise involved retraining specific trunk muscles using ultrasound feedback. Spinal manipulative therapy included joint mobilization and manipulation. Primary outcomes were patient-specific function (PSFS, 3-30) and global perceived effect (GPE, -5 to 5) at 8weeks. These outcomes were also measured at 6 and 12months. Follow-up was 93% at 8weeks and 88% at 6 and 12months. The motor control exercise group had slightly better outcomes than the general exercise group at 8weeks (between-group difference: PSFS 2.9, 95% CI: 0.9-4.8; GPE 1.7, 95% CI: 0.9-2.4), as did the spinal manipulative therapy group (PSFS 2.3, 95% CI: 0.4-4.2; GPE 1.2, 95% CI: 0.4-2.0). The groups had similar outcomes at 6 and 12months. Motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy produce slightly better short-term function and perceptions of effect than general exercise, but not better medium or long-term effects, in patients with chronic non-specific back pain.
Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/terapia , Manipulação da Coluna/métodos , Medição da Dor , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapists and students can potentially influence the outcome of treatment of low back pain. These attitudes and beliefs may be influenced by external factors, such as ethnicity. No study that compared the attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapy students from different cultural backgrounds, such as from Brazil or Australia, towards chronic low back pain was found. The purpose of the present study was therefore to compare the attitudes and beliefs of Brazilian physiotherapy students with those of Australian physiotherapy students and to published data from North American healthcare providers, and to investigate whether a history of chronic low back pain affects students' attitudes and beliefs. METHOD: A survey study design was used. Data were collected from 153 Brazilian physiotherapy students and compared with existing data from Australian physiotherapy students who had never been exposed to a chronic low back pain teaching module. Students' attitudes and beliefs were assessed by use of the HC-PAIRS questionnaire. These data were also compared with published data from North American healthcare providers. RESULTS: The Brazilian physiotherapy students had significantly higher scores on the HC-PAIRS questionnaire than the Australian students and the North American healthcare providers. A previous history of chronic low back pain did not affect students' attitudes and beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: As demonstrated by higher HC-PAIR scores, the Brazilian physiotherapy students agree more strongly with the notion that low back pain justifies disability and activity limitation than do Australian physiotherapy students and North American healthcare providers. A history of chronic low back pain does not affect students' attitudes and beliefs.