Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 69(3): 291-298, 2019.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777350

RESUMO

The use of analgesia techniques for labor has become increasingly frequent, with neuraxial techniques being the most commonly used and most effective. Labor pain entails a number of physiological consequences that may be negative for the mother and fetus, and therefore must be treated. This literature review was performed through a search in the PubMed database, from July to November 2016, and included articles in English or Portuguese, published between 2011 and 2016 or anteriorly, if relevant to the topic. The techniques were divided into the following topics: induction (epidural, combined epidural-spinal, continuous spinal, and epidural with dural puncture) and maintenance of analgesia (continuous epidural infusion, patient-controlled epidural analgesia, and intermittent epidural bolus). Epidural analgesia does not alter the incidence of cesarean sections or fetal prognosis, and maternal request is a sufficient indication for its initiation. The combined technique has the advantage of a faster onset of analgesia; however, patients are subject to a higher incidence of pruritus resulting from the intrathecal administration of opioids. Patient-controlled analgesia seems to be an excellent technique, reducing the consumption of local anesthetics, the number of anesthesiologist interventions, and increasing maternal satisfaction.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Dor do Parto/tratamento farmacológico , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA