RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare data of patients submitted to appendectomy for acute appendicitis at a public hospital and at a private hospital. METHODS: A total of 200 medical records of patients submitted to appendectomy for acute appendicitis at a public hospital (n=100) and at a private hospital (n=100), was reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean age and gender distribution were similar for patients of both hospitals. More patients had been previously evaluated by other physicians in the group of the public hospital (n=85) than of the private hospital (n=13) (p< 0.0001). Ultrasonography was performed more frequently on patients of the public hospital (n=56) than of the private hospital (n=30) (p=0.0002). Length of hospital stay was longer at the public hospital (3.5 ± 2.8 days) than at the private hospital (2.5 ± 1.7 days) (p=0.0024). Postoperative complications were more frequent at the public hospital (n=36) than at the private hospital (n=20) (p<0.0117). Time to resume routine activities was longer for the public hospital (33.2 ± 8.3 days) than for the private hospital (16.4 ± 5.2 days) (p<0.0001). Multivariate logistic-regression analysis showed that the estimated probability of complicated appendicitis increased with the time interval between onset of symptoms and appendectomy (p<0.001). Independent risk factor associated with complicated appendicitis was the time interval between onset of symptoms and appendectomy (odds ratio 41.65, 95% CI {confidence interval} 2.90-597.49, p<0.0001) at the public hospital. There was no independent risk factor associated with complicated appendicitis at the private hospital. CONCLUSION: There are important differences between public and private hospitals in the diagnosis and outcomes of patients with acute appendicitis submitted to appendectomy.
Assuntos
Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Feminino , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy is considered safe, several complications may occur. This study aimed to evaluate the complications observed in 780 laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies at the authors' hospital. METHODS: All the patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy at the authors' hospital during a period of 11 years were enrolled retrospectively in this study. Patient demographics, operative data, and intra- and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 569 patients underwent 780 laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies. The male-to-female ratio was 8.8 to 1, and the mean age was 54.8 ± 15.7 years. Hernia recurrence was recognized in 14 patients (2.5%). Intra- and postoperative complications were diagnosed in 28 (4.9%) and 35 (6.2%) patients respectively. There was no mortality. The most common intraoperative complication was extensive subcutaneous emphysema. Two patients with extensive subcutaneous emphysema had cardiac arrhythmia. Small bowel perforation and bladder perforation occurred in one patient each. One patient had extensive preperitoneal infection caused by Mycobacterium massiliense, which required mesh removal, tissue debridement, and prolonged antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the mortality rate is low, potentially life-threatening complications such as small bowel and bladder perforation may be experienced by patients subjected to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.
Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/etiologia , Peritonite/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Recidiva , Enfisema Subcutâneo/etiologia , Telas CirúrgicasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare data of patients submitted to appendectomy for acute appendicitis at a public hospital and at a private hospital. METHODS: A total of 200 medical records of patients submitted to appendectomy for acute appendicitis at a public hospital (n=100) and at a private hospital (n=100), was reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean age and gender distribution were similar for patients of both hospitals. More patients had been previously evaluated by other physicians in the group of the public hospital (n=85) than of the private hospital (n=13) (p< 0.0001). Ultrasonography was performed more frequently on patients of the public hospital (n=56) than of the private hospital (n=30) (p=0.0002). Length of hospital stay was longer at the public hospital (3.5±2.8 days) than at the private hospital (2.5±1.7 days) (p=0.0024). Postoperative complications were more frequent at the public hospital (n=36) than at the private hospital (n=20) (p<0.0117). Time to resume routine activities was longer for the public hospital (33.2±8.3 days) than for the private hospital (16.4±5.2 days) (p<0.0001). Multivariate logistic-regression analysis showed that the estimated probability of complicated appendicitis increased with the time interval between onset of symptoms and appendectomy (p<0.001). Independent risk factor associated with complicated appendicitis was the time interval between onset of symptoms and appendectomy (odds ratio 41.65, 95 percent CI {confidence interval} 2.90-597.49, p<0.0001) at the public hospital. There was no independent risk factor associated with complicated appendicitis at the private hospital. CONCLUSION:There are important differences between public and private hospitals in the diagnosis and outcomes of patients with acute appendicitis submitted to appendectomy.
OBJETIVO:Comparar dados dos pacientes submetidos à apendicectomia por apendicite aguda em um hospital público e um privado. MÉTODOS: O total de 200 prontuários médicos de pacientes que foram submetidos à apendicectomia por apendicite aguda em um hospital público (n=100) e em um hospital privado (n=100) foi revisado retrospectivamente. RESULTADOS: A idade média e a distribuição dos pacientes por sexo foram similares entre os dois hospitais. Um número maior de pacientes foi previamente avaliado por outro médico no grupo operado no hospital público (n=85) do que no hospital privado (n=13) (p< 0,0001). Ultrassonografia foi realizada mais frequentemente no hospital público (n=56) do que no hospital privado (n=30) (p=0,0002). O tempo de internação hospitalar foi mais longo no hospital público (3,5±2,8 dias) do que no hospital privado (2,5±1,7 dias) (p=0,0024). Complicações pós-operatórias foram mais comuns no hospital público (n=36) do que no hospital privado (n=20) (p<0,0117). O tempo de retorno as atividades de rotina foi mais longo no hospital público (33.2±8.3 dias) do que no hospital privado (16.4±5.2 dias) (p<0,0001). A análise de regressão logística mostrou que a probabilidade estimada da apendicite complicada aumenta com o intervalo de tempo entre o início dos sintomas e a apendicectomia (p<0.001). O fator de risco independente associado com apendicite complicada foi o intervalo de tempo entre o início dos sintomas e a apendicectomia (odds ratio 41.65, 95 por cento CI 2.90-597.49, p<0.0001) no hospital público. Não houve fatores de risco independente associados com apendicite complicada no hospital privado. CONCLUSÃO: Existem importantes diferenças no processo diagnóstico e nos resultados dos pacientes submetidos à apendicectomia por apendicite aguda entre hospital público e privado.