Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 24(5): 796-808, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35013882

RESUMO

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (Y90) is a promising alternative strategy to treat liver tumors and liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC), as it selectively delivers radioactive isotopes to the tumor via the hepatic artery, sparring surrounding liver tissue. The landscape of TARE indications is constantly evolving. This strategy is considered for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with liver-confined disease and preserved liver function in whom neither TACE nor systemic therapy is possible. In patients with liver metastases from CRC, TARE is advised when other chemotherapeutic options have failed. Recent phase III trials have not succeeded to prove benefit in overall survival; however, it has helped to better understand the patients that may benefit from TARE based on subgroup analysis. New strategies and treatment combinations are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical applications of TARE in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/radioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Radioisótopos de Ítrio/uso terapêutico
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 24(1): 112-126, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34363594

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Malnutrition is a common problem among pancreatic cancer (PC) patients that negatively impacts on their quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes. The main objective of this consensus is to address the role of Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) into the comprehensive therapeutic management of PC patients. METHODS: A Spanish multidisciplinary group of specialists from the areas of Medical Oncology; Radiation Oncology; Endocrinology and Nutrition; and General Surgery agreed to assess the role of MNT as part of the best therapeutic management of PC patients. RESULTS: The panel established different recommendations focused on nutritional screening and nutritional screening tools, MNT strategies according to PC status, and MNT in palliative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is an unmet need to integrate nutritional therapy as a crucial part of the multimodal care process in PC patients. Health authorities, health care professionals, cancer patients, and their families should be aware of the relevance of nutritional status and MNT on clinical outcomes and QoL of PC patients.


Assuntos
Desnutrição/dietoterapia , Desnutrição/etiologia , Terapia Nutricional , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Procedimentos Clínicos , Humanos , Estado Nutricional
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(9): 1838-1846, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33866520

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Second-line (2L) treatments for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) achieve a modest benefit at the expense of potential toxicity. In the absence of predictive factors of response, the identification of prognostic factors could help in the therapeutic decisions-making. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic factors associated with shorter survival in patients with advanced PDAC who received 2L treatment. METHODS: We conducted a single institution retrospective study, which included all patients with advanced PDAC who received 2L treatment between September 2006 and February 2020 at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). Significant variables in the logistic regression model were used to create a prognostic score. RESULTS: We included 108 patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 5.10 months (95%CI 4.02-6.17). In the multivariate analysis, time to progression (TTP) shorter than 4 months after first-line treatment (OR 4.53 [95%CI 1.28-16.00] p = 0.01), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) greater than 3 at the beginning of 2L (OR 9.07 [95%CI 1.82-45.16] p = 0.01) and CA-19.9 level higher than the upper limit of normal at the beginning of 2L (OR 7.83 [95%CI 1.30-49.97] p = 0.02) were independently associated with OS shorter than 3 months. The prognostic score classified patients into three prognostic groups (good, intermediate and poor) with significant differences in OS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TTP shorter than 4 months after first-line treatment, NLR greater than 3 and CA-19.9 level higher than the upper limit of normal at the beginning of 2L were associated with shorter overall survival. We developed a prognostic score that classifies patients with advanced PDAC into three prognostic groups after progression to the first-line. This score could help in the decision-making for 2L treatment.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antígenos Glicosídicos Associados a Tumores/sangue , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Modelos Logísticos , Linfócitos/citologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutrófilos/citologia , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Oxaloacetatos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Gencitabina
4.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(5): 988-1000, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33660222

RESUMO

Pancreatic cancer (PC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC) are both aggressive and highly fatal malignancies. Nowadays we have a profound knowledge about the molecular landscape of these neoplasms and this has allowed new therapeutic options. Surgery is the only potentially curative therapy in both cancers, but disease recurrence is frequent. In PC, adjuvant treatment with mFOLFIRINOX has improved overall survival (OS) and in BTC adjuvant treatment with capecitabine seems to improve OS and relapse-free survival. Concomitant radio-chemotherapy could also be considered following R1 surgery in both neoplasms. Neoadjuvant treatment represents the best option for achieving an R0 resection in borderline PC. Upfront systemic chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in unresectable locally advanced PC and BTC; then locoregional therapy could be considered after an initial period of at least 3-4 months of systemic chemotherapy. In metastatic PC, FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel have improved OS compared with gemcitabine alone. In metastatic BTC, cisplatin plus gemcitabine constitute the standard treatment. Progress in the knowledge of molecular biology has enabled the identification of new targets for therapy with encouraging results that could in the future improve the survival and quality of life of patients with PC and BTC.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/genética , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/patologia , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/cirurgia , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Oncologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Sociedades Médicas , Espanha
5.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(3): 536-542, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32651885

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Treatment of recurrent ovarian carcinoma is a challenge, particularly for the clear cell (CCC) subtype. However, there is a preclinical rationale that these patients could achieve a benefit from antiangiogenic therapy. To assess this hypothesis, we used the growth modulation index (GMI), which represents an intrapatient comparison of two successive progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective real-world study performed on 34 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens from January 2009 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was GMI. An established cut-off > 1.33 was defined as a sign of drug activity. RESULTS: 73.5% of patients had high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and 17.7% had CCC; 70.6% of patients received carboplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab, and 29.4% received weekly paclitaxel/bevacizumab. According to histological subtype, the overall response rate and median PFS were 52% and 14 months for HGSOC and 83.3% and 20 months for CCC, respectively. The overall population median GMI was 0.99; it was 0.95 and 2.36 for HGSOC and CCC, respectively. CCC subtype was significantly correlated with GMI > 1.33 (odds ratio 41.67; 95% confidence interval 3.6-486.94; p = .03). CONCLUSION: Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy in recurrent CCC is associated with a remarkable benefit in this cohort. The efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs in CCC warrants further prospective evaluation.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Intervalos de Confiança , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidade , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Razão de Chances , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gencitabina
6.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(6): 1245-1252, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33231859

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer and cancer therapies have been associated with an increased incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). However, the incidence of VTE in patients on immunotherapy has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of VTE in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and ascertain its prognostic utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective study, including all cancer patients treated with anti-Programmed cell Death 1 (PD-1), anti-Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Protein 4 (CTLA4), a combination of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 or a combination including any of these drugs with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents or both between June 2013 and April 2019 at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). RESULTS: We selected 229 patients. VTE occurred in 16 of 229 patients (7%). VTE occurred more frequently in patients with lung cancer followed by melanoma. Female sex and melanoma were independently associated with an increased risk of VTE. 12 of 16 VTE (75%) were symptomatic. Progressive disease to immunotherapy [HR 31.60 (95% CI 11.44-87.22), p = 0.00], lung cancer [HR 2.55 (95% CI 1.34-4.86), p = 0.00] and melanoma [HR 2.42 (1.20-4.86), p = 0.01] were independently associated with shorter OS. VTE occurrence was not independently associated with shorter OS [HR 1.33 (95% CI 0.63-2.80), p = 0.44]. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VTE in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy in our study appeared to be similar to the incidence previously reported in other series of cancer patients treated with systemic therapies. VTE occurrence did not correlate with the prognosis. Further and prospective studies are needed to derive definitive conclusions.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/terapia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(6): 1185-1192, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33226553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been extensively studied in cancer patients. However, the performance of NLR as an early marker of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is still understudied. We studied the utility of NLR at baseline (bNLR), before the second dose of immunotherapy (NLR2) and the NLR trend for predicting efficacy outcomes. METHODS: We included all patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI from June 2013 to April 2019 at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). We examined bNLR, NLR2 and NLR trend and explored the association with progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, median PFS and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We included 211 patients. PFS and OS were significantly longer in the low bNLR group than in the high bNLR group [HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.60-0.84) and HR: 0.66 (95% CI 0.55-0.79), respectively]. Regarding NLR2, patients with low NLR2 had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients with high NLR2 [HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.79) and HR: 0.60 (95% CI 0.50-0.72), respectively]. Finally, for NLR trend, PFS and OS for patients with NLR trend < 1 were significantly longer than those patients with NLR trend ≥ 1 [HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.43-0.82) and HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.44-0.90), respectively]. At the multivariate analysis for PFS and OS, bNLR, NLR2 and NLR trend were all independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: bNLR, NLR2 and NLR trends are independent prognostic factors for survival in patients on immunotherapy. The dynamics of NLR in patients on immunotherapy is a promising marker that needs further investigation.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia , Linfócitos , Neoplasias/sangue , Neoplasias/terapia , Neutrófilos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 22(10): 1849-1856, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32125644

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) have a high risk of relapse in spite of the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. In this context, looking for new prognostic biomarkers is an interesting field of research. Our aim is to analyze the prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and other serum markers in patients with STS who received chemotherapy with curative intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. We included all patients with STS (primary tumor, local recurrence or resected metastatic disease) treated with high-dose ifosfamide and epirubicin with curative intent from January 2007 to December 2018. The pretreatment NLR and other serum markers were calculated, selecting the median as the cut-off value for the survival and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included. Median NLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were 2.83, 174.05 and 3.25, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in patients with low NLR [not reached (NR) vs 21, 92 months, P < 0.01]. No significant differences were found for PFS regarding PLR or LMR. For overall survival (OS), a significant survival advantage was also found for patients with low NLR (NR vs 65.45 months, P = 0.01), without differences for PLR or LMR. In multivariate analysis, NLR remains an independent prognostic factor for PFS. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, low NLR was significantly associated with a longer PFS and OS, and is consolidated as an independent prognostic factor.


Assuntos
Linfócitos , Neutrófilos , Sarcoma/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Plaquetas , Feminino , Humanos , L-Lactato Desidrogenase/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/sangue , Sarcoma/terapia , Adulto Jovem
9.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 22(7): 1049-1058, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31701365

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM, for its Spanish acronym) would like to attest to the relevance of training in Oncology as part of the undergraduate education in Medicine program and issue recommendations to improve said training, with the aim of responding better to the challenges that cancer poses to our society. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The curricula of 42 schools of medicine were reviewed with interviews with at least one teaching medical oncologist from each faculty. The qualitative and opinion analysis was completed by means of an online questionnaire targeting lecturers, resident tutors, and residents in Medical Oncology (MO), enabling the detection of needs and areas for improvement at an organizational level and in terms of skill acquisition. RESULTS: While the number of medical schools with a specific, mandatory program in MO has grown by up to 90%, it has not been accompanied by an increase in independent programs. Instead, they largely consist of programs shared with other specialties (61% of the medical faculties). In most of the undergraduate education programs, Oncology contents are fragmented and approached from the perspective of each organ system. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive evolution in recent years, the heterogeneity in Oncology contents during undergraduate education training continues to be remarkable. Cross-sectional programs with an integral vision, taught in the final years of undergraduate medical education would be desirable. Among the recommendations for improvement of training in Medical Oncology, the SEOM proposes that updated, theoretical content be incorporated and clinical practice in Medical Oncology departments be promoted.


Assuntos
Currículo , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Oncologia/educação , Competência Clínica , Docentes de Medicina , Humanos , Medicina Paliativa/educação , Sociedades Médicas , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ensino
10.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 22(4): 457-467, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31240462

RESUMO

The elderly form a very heterogeneous group in relation to their general health state, degree of dependence, comorbidities, performance status, physical reserve and geriatric situation, so cancer treatment in the older patient remains a therapeutic challenge. The physiological changes associated with aging increase the risk of developing a serious toxicity induced by chemotherapy treatment, as well as other undesirable consequences as hospitalizations, dependence and non-compliance with treatment, that can negatively affect survival, quality of life and treatment efficacy. The use of hematopoietic growth factors and other active supportive interventions in the elderly can help prevent and/or alleviate these toxicities. However, we have little data on the efficacy and tolerance of support treatments in the older patient. The objective of this work is to review the most frequent toxicities of oncological treatments in the elderly and their management.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Anemia/terapia , Sistema Cardiovascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Diarreia/terapia , Fadiga/terapia , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Neutropenia/terapia , Cooperação do Paciente
11.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 22(8): 1288-1294, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31853761

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Capectiabine is an oral antineoplastic drug used in multiple malignancies. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been proven to interact with other oral antineoplastic agents. In this systematic review we will summarize the clinical evidence on the efficacy of capecitabine when used concomitantly with PPI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search on the main databases up to November 2019. RESULTS: Nine studies met our inclusion criteria: 8 retrospective studies and 1 phase II clinical trial. Patients with colorectal, breast and gastroesophageal were represented. Four out of the 9 studies reported a shorter efficacy outcome in uni- or multivariate analysis when capecitabine was taken concomitantly with PPI than alone. CONCLUSIONS: Up to date, the clinical evidence reported on the use of capecitabine concomitantly with PPI is scarce and shows conflicting results. While awaiting further data, avoiding misuse of PPI in cancer patients taking capecitabine is recommended.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico
12.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(1): 46-54, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30565083

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second cause of cancer death in Spain, the objective of this guide published by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology is to develop a consensus for the diagnosis and management of metastatic disease. The optimal treatment strategy for patients with metastatic CRC should be discussed in a multidisciplinary expert team to select the most appropriate treatment, and integrate systemic treatment and other options such as surgery and ablative techniques depending on the characteristics of the tumour, the patient and the location of the disease and metastases.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Prognóstico , Sociedades Médicas
13.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 19(4): 498-507, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27718155

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In the VELOUR study, aflibercept + FOLFIRI regimen resulted in improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who progressed after oxaliplatin. The use of aflibercept outside the clinical trial framework needs to be further assessed in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. METHODS: Early access to aflibercept through a named patient programme (NPP) was provided to mCRC patients receiving FOLFIRI as second-line treatment in Spain. The effectiveness of aflibercept was assessed as progression-free survival (PFS) achieved within the NPP population. Post hoc analyses on PFS were done according to certain baseline characteristics (K-RAS mutation, prior targeted therapy) or prognostic factors. RESULTS: Registries from 71 mCRC patients included in the NPP were reviewed retrospectively. The median age for the NPP population was 64 years (19.7 % aged ≥70 years) and 63.4 % patients had ≥2 metastases. A median PFS of 5.3 months (95 % CI, 3.6-8.5 months) was achieved, which did not depend on K-RAS mutation status or prior targeted therapy received. The risk of progression or death increased in patients with a poor prognosis as per the GERCOR score (performance status [PS] 1-2 and increased baseline lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] level) compared with patients with a good prognosis (PS 0 and normal LDH level) (median PFS: 2.6 vs. 8.3 months, respectively; p = 0.0124). Aflibercept was well tolerated, with a manageable toxicity profile. CONCLUSIONS: Bearing in mind the differences in sample size, the PFS achieved with the aflibercept + FOLFIRI regimen in the real-life practice setting is comparable to that observed in the clinical trial setting.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Irinotecano , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Prognóstico , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha , Taxa de Sobrevida
14.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 18(12): 1172-1178, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27896637

RESUMO

Pancreatic cancer remains an aggressive disease with a 5 year survival rate of 5%. Only 15% of patients with pancreatic cancer are eligible for radical surgery. Evidence suggests a benefit on survival with adjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine o fluourouracil) after R1/R0 resection. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is also a valid option in patients with positive margins. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is defined as the involvement of the mesenteric vasculature with a limited extension. These tumors are technically resectable, but with a high risk of positive margins. Neoadjuvant treatment represents the best option for achieving an R0 resection. In advanced disease, two new chemotherapy treatment schemes (Folfirinox or Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel) have showed improvements in overall survival compared with gemcitabine alone. Progress in pancreatic cancer treatment will require a better knowledge of the molecular biology of this disease, focusing on personalized cancer therapies in the near future.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 18(11): 1072-1081, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27037815

RESUMO

Treatment with regorafenib has demonstrated statistically significant improvements in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control when compared with placebo in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in two placebo-controlled, randomized, phase III trials (CORRECT and CONCUR). Similar results were observed in two open-label, single-arm studies (REBECCA and CONSIGN) performed in the real-world setting. But several authors have suggested that the benefit provided by regorafenib may not be clinically meaningful for these patients. Moreover, it has been suggested that not all subgroups of patients might benefit from regorafenib. The intention of this review is to provide an overview of the existing evidence for regorafenib in terms of efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in different subpopulations according to clinical and biological characteristics. Additionally, the magnitude of the clinical benefit provided by regorafenib to these patients has been explored and whether there are poorer outcomes in certain subpopulations.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida
16.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 17(12): 988-95, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26607931

RESUMO

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Surveillance with abdominal ultrasound every 6 months should be offered to patients with a high risk of developing HCC: Child-Pugh A-B cirrhotic patients, all cirrhotic patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation, high-risk HBV chronic hepatitis patients (higher viral load, viral genotype or Asian or African ancestry) and patients with chronic hepatitis C and bridging fibrosis. Accurate diagnosis, staging and functional hepatic reserve are crucial for the optimal therapeutic approach. Characteristic findings on dynamic CT/MR of arterial hyperenhancement with "washout" in the portal venous or delayed phase are highly specific and sensitive for a diagnosis of HCC in patients with previous cirrhosis, but a confirmed histopathologic diagnosis should be done in patients without previous evidence of chronic hepatic disease. BCLC classification is the most common staging system used in Western countries. Surgical procedures, local therapies and systemic treatments should be discussed and planned for each patient by a multidisciplinary team according to the stage, performance status, liver function and comorbidities. Surgical interventions remain as the only curative procedures but both local and systemic approaches may increase survival and should be offered to patients without contraindications.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Terapia Combinada , Gerenciamento Clínico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Humanos , Oncologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Sociedades Médicas
17.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 17(4): 322-9, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25301403

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is generally based on genetic testing performed in primary tumor biopsies, but whether the genomic status of primary tumors is identical to that of metastases is not well known. We compared the gene expression profiles of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies of colorectal primary tumors and matched liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the expression of 18 genes in FFPE CRC tumors and their matched liver metastases from 32 patients. The expression of each gene in CRC primary tumors and their matched liver metastases was tested using Student's t test for paired samples. Pairwise correlations of each gene in the primary tumors and matched liver metastases were evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The expression of six genes was significantly different in primary tumors compared with their matched liver metastases [CXCR4 (p < 0.001), THBS1 (p = 0.007), MMP 9 (p = 0.048), GST Pi (p = 0.050), TYMP (p = 0.042) and DPYD (p < 0.001)]. For the remaining genes, where no significant differences were observed, only SMAD4 (r s = 0.447, p = 0.010), ERCC1 (r s = 0.423, p = 0.016) and VEGF A (r s = 0.453, p = 0.009) showed significant correlation in expression between the two tissues. Therefore, we only detected similar gene expression levels between the tumor and the metastases in these three markers. CONCLUSIONS: We only found similar gene expression levels between the tumor and the metastases in three genes (SMAD4, ERCC1, and VEGF A). However, our study could not assess whether the differences in gene expression were secondary to tumoral heterogeneity or to molecular changes induced by previous chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Endonucleases/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Estudos Retrospectivos , Proteína Smad4/genética , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/genética
18.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 17(2): 133-8, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25060566

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Colorectal liver metastases (CLM) have significant molecular heterogeneity, which contributes to the risk of recurrence following surgery. Most of the traditional scores intended to predict recurrence is based on clinicopathological variables and it is unclear whether incorporating molecular biomarkers might improve our assessment of the risk of recurrence. Our aim was to determine if molecular biomarkers might be associated with the risk of recurrence after surgery of CLM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 121 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) with resected liver metastases were included. The role of several clinicopathological variables to predict patient's outcome after resection of liver metastases was analyzed. Eighteen genes related to CRC pathogenesis were also included in the analyses. Univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with recurrence and the risk of death. RESULTS: Eight prognostic factors for progression-free survival and nine factors for overall survival were identified in the univariate analyses. After adjusting for other risk factors, only the expression of two molecular factors was associated with the risk of recurrence: TS (HR 0.631, 95 % CI 0.422-0.944) and SMAD4 (HR 1.680, 95 % CI 1.047-2.695). None of the variables was significantly associated with the risk of death in the multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic significance of most traditional clinicopathological variables might be insufficient to define patients at risk for recurrence after liver metastases resection. Molecular biomarkers might improve the identification of patients with higher risk of recurrence.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Proteína Smad4/genética , Timidilato Sintase/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hepatectomia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Taxa de Sobrevida
19.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 16(11): 942-53, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25223744

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common tumors worldwide and at least 50 % of patients with this disease develop metastases. In this setting, additional treatment options are needed for patients presenting disease progression after exhausting all standard therapies. Regorafenib is an orally administered multikinase inhibitor which has been shown to provide survival benefits to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although most adverse events (AEs) associated with regorafenib may resolve within the first 8 weeks of treatment, some of them may require dose reduction or treatment interruption. Overall, while remaining aware of the safety profile of regorafenib and how to manage the most common toxicities related to its use, this drug should be considered a new standard of care for patients with pretreated mCRC. This review addresses practical aspects of its use, such as dosing, patient monitoring, and management of the most common regorafenib-related AEs.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos
20.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 15(12): 996-1003, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23896865

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common malignant tumor in Western countries. Despite efforts made to implement screening programmes for early detection and treatment, still half of the patients present or will eventually develop distant metastasis. Management of advanced CRC should be discussed within an experienced multidisciplinary team, to adequately select the most appropriate systemic therapeutic option, as well as the optimal way to integrate it with surgical procedures when indicated. Disease localization and extent, resectability of primary and metastatic disease, tumor biology and dynamics, clinical symptoms, personal preferences and patient's ability to tolerate intensive chemotherapy or extensive surgical procedures are the key factors to properly design a customized treatment plan. The aim of the current manuscript is to provide synthetic practical guidelines regarding therapeutic options for advanced CRC.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/normas , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA