RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is pressure on acute admission services in inner-city areas. Two deprived London districts with markedly different acute bed ratios but similar sociodemographic backgrounds were compared to test the hypothesis that more facilities mean better service. METHOD: An instrument for auditing the use of short-stay hospital beds was constructed to collect information concerning admissions to, and short-stay patients in, the chosen districts during a three-month period. RESULTS: There was a higher admission rate and substantially greater use of beds per unit population in south Southwark than in Hammersmith & Fulham. Much of the difference was attributable to a higher rate of admission of patients with affective disorders in south Southwark. CONCLUSIONS: The results are not explained by variations in population need, longer in-patient stay, or poorer aftercare leading to early relapse. The question of whether there is over-provision of services compared with real need in south Southwark, or under-provision (particularly for people with affective disorders) in Hammersmith & Fulham, is considered but left open for discussion following a study of ethnic issues and the reasons for admission.
Assuntos
Auditoria Médica , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitalização , Hospitais Psiquiátricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/reabilitação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Reino Unido/etnologia , Índias OcidentaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Twenty-six per cent of patients in two Inner London districts were admitted to acute wards under the provisions of the Mental Health Act. Compared with those not under compulsion, they were young, male, more likely to be of black Caribbean origin, and to have a diagnosis of schizophrenia of short duration. The hypothesis is tested that ethnicity determines rates of compulsory admission independently of the other factors. METHOD: Sampling and data collection methods were described in the first paper. Statistical analyses included a log-linear analysis of six key variables: compulsory admission, challenging behaviour, diagnosis, ethnicity, age, and sex. RESULTS: There were no substantial differences between districts. Analysis provided two similar statistical models. In both, admission under the Act was strongly associated with challenging behaviour and diagnosis of schizophrenia. In the model of best fit there was no significant interaction term for ethnicity and compulsion. In the second model there was a weak association. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity did not appear to be of outstanding importance in decisions to use the Mental Health Act. There was a strong link between ethnicity and diagnosis, independent of compulsion. Differences between the districts made no major contribution to the rates of compulsory admission.
Assuntos
Auditoria Médica , Transtornos Mentais/reabilitação , Admissão do Paciente , Fatores Etários , Etnicidade/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Londres/etnologia , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Reino Unido/etnologia , Índias OcidentaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Twenty-six per cent of patients in two inner London districts were admitted to acute wards under the provisions of the Mental Health Act. Compared with those not under compulsion, they were young, male, more likely to be of black Caribbean origin, and to have a diagnosis of schizophrenia of short duration. The hypothesis is tested that ethnicity determines rates of compulsory admission independently of the other factors. METHOD: Sampling and data collection methods were described in the first paper. Statistical analyses included a log-linear analysis of six key variables: compulsory admission, challenging behaviour, diagnosis, ethnicity, age, and sex. RESULTS: There were no substantial differences between districts. Analysis provided two similar statistical models. In both, admission under the Act was strongly associated with challenging behaviour and diagnosis of schizoprenia. In the model of best fit there was no significant interaction term for ethnicity and compulsion. In the second model there was a weak association. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity did not appear to be of outstanding importance in decisions to use the Mental Health Act. There was a strong link between ethnicity and diagnosis, independent of compulsion. Differences between the districts made no major contribution to the rates of compulsory admission (AU)