RESUMO
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a global public health problem caused by species on the genus Leishmania and is the most prevalent clinical form of leishmaniasis. The aim of this study was to develop a new LAMP assay for Leishmania sp. based on HSP70 gene and evaluate it clinically for molecular diagnosis of CL. The study was carried out in the following stages: i) design of primers based on HSP70 gene of Leishmania sp.; ii) evaluation of detection limit and analytical specificity; iii) estimation of the accuracy of LAMP-Leish/HSP70 assay for diagnosing CL. A total of 100 skin biopsy samples from patients, comprising 60 CL cases and 40 non-cases, were analyzed in this study. One LAMP assay using HSP70 gene as molecular target were standardized, and the observed detection limit was 100fg of L. braziliensis purified DNA. The LAMP-Leish/HSP70 assay was specific for Leishmania spp. The LAMP-Leish/HSP70 assay showed an accuracy of 92%, and positivity rates were not affected by lesion onset time or parasite load. This novel LAMP assay targeting the HSP70 gene of Leishmania sp. has the potential to be a useful tool to integrate into routine diagnosis for suspected cases of CL.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Choque Térmico HSP70 , Leishmaniose Cutânea , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico , Humanos , Proteínas de Choque Térmico HSP70/genética , Leishmaniose Cutânea/diagnóstico , Leishmaniose Cutânea/parasitologia , Leishmaniose Cutânea/genética , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , DNA de Protozoário/genética , Leishmania/genética , Leishmania/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
A rapid and accurate diagnosis is a crucial strategy for containing the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Considering the obstacles to upscaling the use of RT-qPCR, rapid tests based on antigen detection (Ag-RDT) have become an alternative to enhance mass testing, reducing the time for a prompt diagnosis and virus spreading. However, the performances of several commercially available Ag-RDTs have not yet been evaluated in several countries. Here, we evaluate the performance of eight Ag-RDTs available in Brazil to diagnose COVID-19. Patients admitted to tertiary hospitals with moderate or mild COVID-19 symptoms and presenting risk factors for severe disease were included. The tests were performed using a masked protocol, strictly following the manufacturer's recommendations and were compared with RT-qPCR. The overall sensitivity of the tests ranged from 9.8 to 81.1%, and specificity greater than 83% was observed for all the evaluated tests. Overall, slight or fair agreement was observed between Ag-RDTs and RT-PCR, except for the Ag-RDT COVID-19 (Acro Biotech), in which moderate agreement was observed. Lower sensitivity of Ag-RDTs was observed for patients with cycle threshold > 25, indicating that the sensitivity was directly affected by viral load, whereas the effect of the disease duration was unclear. Despite the lower sensitivity of Ag-RDTs compared with RT-qPCR, its easy fulfillment and promptness still justify its use, even at hospital admission. However, the main advantage of Ag-RDTs seems to be the possibility of increasing access to the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with a high viral load, allowing immediate clinical management and reduction of infectivity and community transmission.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Antígenos Virais/análise , Brasil/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Timely and accurate laboratory testing is essential for managing the global COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction remains the gold-standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, but several practical issues limit the test's use. Immunoassays have been indicated as an alternative for individual and mass testing. OBJECTIVES: To access the performance of 12 serological tests for COVID-19 diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a blind evaluation of six lateral-flow immunoassays (LFIAs) and six enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) commercially available in Brazil for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. RESULTS: Considering patients with seven or more days of symptoms, the sensitivity ranged from 59.5% to 83.1% for LFIAs and from 50.7% to 92.6% for ELISAs. For both methods, the sensitivity increased with clinical severity and days of symptoms. The agreement among LFIAs performed with digital blood and serum was moderate. Specificity was, in general, higher for LFIAs than for ELISAs. Infectious diseases prevalent in the tropics, such as HIV, leishmaniasis, arboviruses, and malaria, represent conditions with the potential to cause false-positive results with these tests, which significantly compromises their specificity. CONCLUSION: The performance of immunoassays was only moderate, affected by the duration and clinical severity of the disease. Absence of discriminatory power between IgM/IgA and IgG has also been demonstrated, which prevents the use of acute-phase antibodies for decisions on social isolation.