RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inadequate working conditions and sedentary work can exert a negative impact on workers' health and wellbeing, leading to musculoskeletal disorders and disability. Mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) have high potential for the self-management of workers' health. OBJECTIVE: To identify mHealth apps aimed at promoting workers' health and wellbeing available in Brazilian online stores and assess these apps in terms of engagement, functionality, aesthetics and information quality. METHODS: A systematic search for apps was conducted in the Brazilian online App Store and Play Store in December 2022. Only smartphone apps in Brazilian Portuguese directed at workers' health were assessed. The appraisal of the quality of the applications was performed using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). RESULTS: Among the 3449 mHealth apps found, ten were eligible for inclusion. The mean overall score was 3.15 ± 0.91 on a scale of 1-5. The lowest score was found for the "credibility" item. Exercises and breaks were the most frequent strategies. Most apps provided low-quality information from questionable sources and therefore received a mean score of 2.1 ± 1.5 on the MARS information subscale. CONCLUSION: Ten relevant mHealth apps were eligible for inclusion. The mHealth apps for the promotion of workers' health and wellbeing currently available in Brazil exhibited moderate quality and limited functionality.

Assuntos

RESUMO

This study was conducted to describe the health conditions (the psychosocial aspects, sleep quality, and musculoskeletal symptoms) among Brazilian healthcare workers in the context of the pandemic. Workers answered an online questionnaire, including the short version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ II), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The most unfavourable psychosocial factors were work pace (61%; 95% CI: 52-69%), emotional work demands (75%; 95% CI: 67-82%), predictability (47%; 95% CI: 39-56%), work-family conflict (55%; 95% CI: 46-64%), burnout (86%; 95% CI: 78-91%), and stress (81%; 95% CI: 73-87%). Most workers (74%; 95% CI: 66-81%) were classified as poor sleepers. Musculoskeletal symptoms were frequent in the neck (64%; 95% CI: 55-72%), shoulders (62%; 95% CI: 54-70%), upper back (58%; 95% CI: 50-67%), and lower back (61%; 95% CI: 52-69%). Depressive symptoms were also highly prevalent (mild: 22%; 95% CI: 15-30%, moderate: 16%; 95% CI: 11-23%, severe: 8%; 95% CI: 4-14%). Most healthcare workers experience unfavourable psychosocial factors, poor sleep quality, as well as musculoskeletal and depressive symptoms. These findings underscore the urgent need to acknowledge and address psychological and physical distress to improve the personal and professional well-being of this population.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Psychosocial factors may be associated with multisite pain, which is characterized by pain symptoms in more than one part of the body. The aim of the present study was to determine associations between psychosocial factors and multisite pain in a population of workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 195 workers (educators, administrative technicians, healthcare workers, cleaners, and zookeepers). Psychosocial factors were evaluated using the short form of the second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Multisite pain was identified using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. RESULTS: Multisite pain was associated with quantitative demands (OR=1.31; 95% CI: 1.06-1.63), work pace (OR=1.20; 95% CI: 1.01-1.43), emotional demands (OR=1.39; 95% CI: 1.18-1.63), commitment to the workplace (OR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.62-0.91), predictability (OR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.99), job satisfaction (OR=0.53; 95% CI: 0.32-0.88), work-family conflict (OR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.16-1.62), justice (OR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.69-0.94), general health perception (OR=0.54; 95% CI: 0.38-0.76), burnout (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.17-1.69), and stress (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.18-1.68). CONCLUSION: Several psychosocial factors were associated with multisite pain, indicating that these factors could be considered in the multisite pain management.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Fatores psicossociais podem estar associados à dor multirregional, caracterizada por sintomas de dor em mais de uma parte do corpo. O objetivo do presente estudo foi determinar associações entre fatores psicossociais e dor multirregional em uma população de trabalhadores. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado um estudo transversal com 195 trabalhadores (professores, técnicos administrativos, profissionais de saúde, faxineiros e funcionários de zoológicos). Os fatores psicossociais foram avaliados por meio da versão abreviada da segunda versão do Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. A dor multirregional foi identificada por meio do Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. RESULTADOS: A dor multirregional foi associada com demandas quantitativas (OR=1,31; IC 95%: 1,06-1,63), ritmo de trabalho (OR=1,20; IC 95%: 1,01-1,43), demandas emocionais (OR=1,39; IC 95%: 1,18- 1,63), compromisso com o local de trabalho (OR=0,75; IC 95%: 0,62-0,91), previsibilidade (OR=0,86; IC 95%: 0,76-0,99), satisfação no trabalho (OR=0,53; IC 95%: 0,32-0,88), conflito trabalho-família (OR=1,37; IC 95%: 1,16-1,62), justiça (OR=0,81; IC 95%: 0,69-0,94), percepção geral de saúde (OR=0,54; IC 95%: 0,38-0,76), burnout (OR=1,41; IC 95%: 1,17-1,69) e estresse (OR=1,41; IC 95%: 1,18-1,68). CONCLUSÃO: Vários fatores psicossociais foram associados à dor multirregional, indicando que estes devem ser abordados no manejo da dor.