Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J AOAC Int ; 106(2): 261-266, 2023 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36610993

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dry matter (DM) is a routine test for all animal feeds, facilitating feed comparisons and diet formulation. It is the most frequent test, yet the most challenging with respect to precision and accuracy. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy, repeatability, and physicochemical impacts of oven-drying times on LDM test results in animal feeds obtained by loss on drying (LoD) at 105°C. METHODS: Eighteen primary samples collected from different feed sources were grouped into high-moisture (HM) and low-moisture (LM) content materials. The tested methods were based on LoD at 105°C and Karl Fischer titration was adopted as the reference method. Test portions were oven dried at 105°C for 3, 6, 12, 16, and 24 h, and test results were compared to the reference method. Test portions were also subjected to a color evaluation using a colorimetric technique. RESULTS: The method based on 3 h of drying provided the closest estimates to those obtained by Karl Fischer titration. Extending heating time (i.e., above 3 h) increased the bias, especially for HM feeds, which was attributed to a higher occurrence of non-enzymatic reactions. This was corroborated by the color of the residues, which became darker with increased heating time. The repeatability of LoD methods was considered adequate, ranging from 0.32 to 0.73%. CONCLUSION: The LoD method based on the binomial 105°C × 3 h minimizes the bias in the water recovery and causes less non-enzymatic browning in the test portions. HIGHLIGHTS: The loss-on-drying method recommended for laboratory DM in animal feeds is drying the test portions at 105°C for 3 h.


Assuntos
Dessecação , Calefação , Animais , Ração Animal/análise
2.
J AOAC Int ; 106(1): 6-13, 2022 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35984288

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Crude ash is categorized as an empirical method playing an important role in the nutritional interpretation of animal feeds, allowing indirect estimation of total organic matter (OM). OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate variations in laboratory procedures for crude ash quantification regarding physical parameters (i.e., time, temperature) and ashing aids and their influences on crude ash, repeatability, and discrimination power among feeds. METHODS: The "control" method was based on a simple ignition time of 3 h at 550°C. The variations are briefly described: increasing ashing time to 6 h; increasing temperature to 600°C; and using two 3 h ignition cycles at 550°C with ashing aids inclusion between them: fresh air supply, fresh air supply plus distilled water, and fresh air supply plus hydrogen peroxide. A color evaluation was also performed using a colorimetric technique. Twenty-four study materials from eight different feed types were evaluated. RESULTS: The crude ash results differed among the method variations, but a consistent decrease in the estimates was observed when liquid aids were applied, which also improved repeatability. Ash residues did not present a consistent color pattern among methods, but the residues were darker when the control method was applied. CONCLUSION: The method of obtaining ash residues in animal feeds based on 550°C × 3 h does not have enough robustness and may overestimate crude ash in some feeds. Adjustments in either ignition time or temperature might improve crude ash test results, but the best test results are obtained using liquid ashing aids between two ignition cycles. HIGHLIGHTS: The recommended method is based on the use of 550°C and two 3 h ignition cycles with water added to the ash residue between cycles.


Assuntos
Ração Animal , Animais , Temperatura , Ração Animal/análise
3.
An Acad Bras Cienc ; 93(3): e20190487, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33533800

RESUMO

Effects of protein supplementation, with and without starch supplementation, on nutritional performance and metabolic characteristics of cattle fed low- and medium-quality tropical forages were evaluated using 4 cannulated steers distributed according to a 4 × 4 Latin square. Experimental periods were divided into two subperiods. In the first subperiod, two animals received low-quality hay and two animals received medium-quality. Supplementation schemes were evaluated in the second subperiod: low-quality hay with protein (300 g of crude protein - CP/d); low-quality hay with protein (300 g CP/d) and starch (225 g/d); medium-quality hay with protein (300 g CP/d); and medium-quality hay with protein (300 g CP/d) and starch (225 g/d) supplementation. Without supplementation, medium-quality forage provided higher intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance (NB) and efficiency of nitrogen utilization (EFNU). Comparing subperiods, supply of supplements depressed medium-quality forage intake, but did not affect low-quality forage intake. Supplementation increased NB, EFNU and serum concentration of IGF1 in animals fed low-quality forage. Protein supplementation increases nitrogen retention in animals, an effect attributed mainly to anabolic stimuli. However, this effect is more prominent when animals are fed low-quality forages. No positive impact on animal metabolism was obtained with combination of supplemental protein and starch.


Assuntos
Digestão , Rúmen , Ração Animal , Animais , Bovinos , Suplementos Nutricionais , Amido
4.
An. acad. bras. ciênc ; 89(2): 1295-1303, Apr.-June 2017. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-886692

RESUMO

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to compare the estimates of ether extract (EE) contents obtained by the Randall method and by the high-temperature method of the American Oil Chemist's Society (AOCS; Am 5-04) in forages (n = 20) and cattle feces (n = 15). The EE contents were quantified by using the Randall extraction or AOCS method and XT4 filter bags or cartridges made of qualitative filter paper (80 g/m²) as containers for the samples. It was also evaluated the loss of particles, and concentration of residual chlorophyll after extraction and the recovery of protein and minerals in the material subjected to extraction. Significant interaction was observed between extraction method and material for EE contents. The EE estimates using the AOCS method were higher, mainly in forages. No loss of particles was observed with different containers. The chlorophyll contents in the residues of cattle feces were not affected by the extraction method; however, residual chlorophyll was lower using the AOCS method in forages. There was complete recovery of the protein and ash after extraction. The results suggest that AOCS method produces higher estimates of EE contents in forages and cattle feces, possibly by providing greater extraction of non-fatty EE.


Assuntos
Animais , Técnicas de Química Analítica/métodos , Éter/análise , Éter/química , Fezes/química , Poaceae/química , Ração Animal/análise , Bovinos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Temperatura Alta
5.
An Acad Bras Cienc ; 89(2): 1295-1303, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28489203

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to compare the estimates of ether extract (EE) contents obtained by the Randall method and by the high-temperature method of the American Oil Chemist's Society (AOCS; Am 5-04) in forages (n = 20) and cattle feces (n = 15). The EE contents were quantified by using the Randall extraction or AOCS method and XT4 filter bags or cartridges made of qualitative filter paper (80 g/m²) as containers for the samples. It was also evaluated the loss of particles, and concentration of residual chlorophyll after extraction and the recovery of protein and minerals in the material subjected to extraction. Significant interaction was observed between extraction method and material for EE contents. The EE estimates using the AOCS method were higher, mainly in forages. No loss of particles was observed with different containers. The chlorophyll contents in the residues of cattle feces were not affected by the extraction method; however, residual chlorophyll was lower using the AOCS method in forages. There was complete recovery of the protein and ash after extraction. The results suggest that AOCS method produces higher estimates of EE contents in forages and cattle feces, possibly by providing greater extraction of non-fatty EE.


Assuntos
Ração Animal/análise , Técnicas de Química Analítica/métodos , Éter/análise , Éter/química , Fezes/química , Poaceae/química , Animais , Bovinos , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Temperatura Alta , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA