Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ; 70(3): 345-8, 1990 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2216364

RESUMO

In an article on endodontic flare-ups by Robert J. Matusow, our research and publications are discussed. Since we found what we consider to be distortions and misinterpretations of our work, it was decided to clarify the apparent discrepancies found in Matusow's article.


Assuntos
Doenças da Polpa Dentária/microbiologia , Pré-Medicação , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/efeitos adversos , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Anaeróbias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória
2.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ; 69(5): 619-30, 1990 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2185452

RESUMO

In a previous study by our group with patients having asymptomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis and an associated periapical radiolucent lesion (PN/PL), it was shown that prophylactic administration of penicillin V or erythromycin (high-dose, 1-day regimen) resulted in a low incidence of flare-up (mean = 2.2%) and a low incidence of swelling and pain not associated with flare-up. No hypersensitivity responses occurred, and gastrointestinal side effects were found primarily with the erythromycins. To ascertain whether a single-dose administration of a long-acting 1-gm tablet of the cephalosporin antibiotic cefadroxil would result in a similar outcome, the present study was undertaken with 200 patients having quiescent PN/PL. The patients were randomly given either cefadroxil or erythromycin (base or stearate). Evaluations of flare-up were done 1 day, 1 week, and 2 months after endodontic treatment. A 2.0% flare-up incidence was found, with no statistically significant differences for cefadroxil (1.0%), stearate (2.0%), or base (4.0%). No hypersensitivity responses occurred. Gastrointestinal side effects were found primarily with the erythromycins (19.0%). The results showed that a 1-gm, single-dose regimen of cefadroxil was as effective as erythromycin and penicillin in preventing flare-ups and serious sequelae. A comparative analysis of the data from our first study (no peritreatment antibiotics) and the pooled data from our last three investigations (including the current trial) showed that peritreatment antibiotic coverage significantly reduced flare-ups and serious sequelae after endodontic treatment of asymptomatic PN/PL (p less than 0.001).


Assuntos
Cefadroxila/uso terapêutico , Necrose da Polpa Dentária/cirurgia , Eritromicina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Periapicais/cirurgia , Pré-Medicação , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Criança , Necrose da Polpa Dentária/tratamento farmacológico , Edema/prevenção & controle , Eritromicina/administração & dosagem , Eritromicina/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Doenças Periapicais/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA