RESUMO
CONTEXT: Shoulder pain is pervasive in swimmers of all ages. However, given the limited number of prospective studies, injury risk factors in swimmers remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which the risk factors of previous injury, poor movement competency, erroneous freestyle swimming technique, and low perceived susceptibility to sport injury were associated with noncontact musculoskeletal injury in collegiate swimmers. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: College natatorium. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven National College Athletic Association Division III swimmers (21 females, 16 males; median age = 19 years [interquartile range = 3 years], height = 175 ± 10 cm; mass = 70.0 ± 10.9 kg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants completed preseason questionnaires on their previous injuries and perceived susceptibility to sport injury. At the beginning of the season, they completed the Movement System Screening Tool and the Freestyle Swimming Technique Assessment. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for the association between each risk factor and injury. RESULTS: Eleven of the 37 participants (29.7%) sustained an injury. Univariate analyses identified 2 risk factors: previous injury (OR = 8.89 [95% CI = 1.78, 44.48]) and crossover hand positions during the freestyle entry phase (OR = 8.50 [95% CI = 1.50, 48.05]). After adjusting for previous injury, we found that a higher perceived percentage chance of injury (1 item from the Perceived Susceptibility to Sport Injury) decreased the injury odds (adjusted OR = 0.11 [95% CI = 0.02, 0.82]). Poor movement competency was not associated with injury (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Previous injury, a crossover hand-entry position in freestyle, and a low perceived percentage chance of injury were associated with increased injury odds. Ascertaining injury histories and assessing for crossover positions may help identify swimmers with an elevated injury risk and inform injury-prevention strategies.
Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas , Lesões do Ombro , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Prospectivos , Natação/lesões , Dor de Ombro/etiologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/complicações , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
CONTEXT: Swimmers are known for experiencing high training loads and a high incidence of overuse injuries, but few researchers have investigated the relationship between the two at the collegiate level. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between workload and noncontact musculoskeletal injury in collegiate swimmers. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: College natatorium. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 37 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III swimmers, 26 uninjured (age = 19 years [interquartile range = 3 years], height = 175 ± 11 cm, mass = 70.2 ± 10 kg) and 11 injured (age = 19 years [interquartile range = 3 years], height = 173 ± 9 cm, mass = 69.4 ± 13.5 kg) individuals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was conducted to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for injury relative to high workloads and high acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWRs). Injury rates for several ranges of workloads and ACWRs were also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 11 participants (29.7%) sustained 12 injuries, with 7 injuries occurring during the participants' winter training trip. Injury was associated with high acute workloads (OR = 27.1; 95% CI = 8.2, 89.8) and high ACWRs (OR = 25.1; 95% CI = 7.7, 81.4) but not high chronic (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 0.3, 20.0) or overall (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.99, 1.01) workloads. High acute workloads (>37.2 km/wk) and ACWRs (>1.56) increased the injury rate from ≤1% to 15% and 14%, respectively, compared with all lower acute workloads and ACWRs. CONCLUSIONS: Collegiate swimmers tolerated high workloads spread out during the season. However, caution should be used when prescribing high acute workloads and high ACWRs (eg, winter training trip) because of the increased odds of injury.
Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas , Esportes , Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Prospectivos , Universidades , Carga de TrabalhoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Non-traumatic extremity injuries are particularly common in sports, representing a significant economic, academic, and psychosocial burden on athletes. Proposed musculoskeletal risk factors for increased injury and decreased performance in athletes include movement pattern inefficiency, decreased regional stability, decreased mobility, and asymmetrical movement. The Movement System Screening Tool (MSST) is a comprehensive screening tool designed to assess these factors. Thus, the purpose of this study was to describe the development and determine the content and construct validity and inter-rater reliability of the MSST. METHODS: A modified Delphi panel of experts determined content validity. 80 athletes (40 with and 40 without a current non-traumatic shoulder injury) completed 21 clinical tests, with exploratory factor analysis and known group analysis performed to determine construct validity. Two independent raters were used to establish individual item and composite score inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis identified three of the four apriori constructs over 7 factors (14 tests), representing 63% of the variance. Known group analysis revealed a significantly lower composite score in athletes with vs. without a current non-traumatic shoulder injury (56.9±5.8 vs. 62.7±4.5, respectively). A preliminary cut score of 62 was chosen with sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 44%. Composite score inter-rater reliability was excellent ICC (2,1)=0.94, 95% CI (0.91, 0.96) and item reliability ranged from κ=.57 to 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: The MSST possesses constructs representative of injury risk and measurement properties acceptable for use in clinical settings. Comprehensive screens with construct validity and known measurement error are needed not only to identify athletes at risk of injury, but also provide an instrument that can be used in studies that seek to validate training approaches proposed to change movement impairment and injury risk in athletes.
Assuntos
Atletas , Teste de Esforço , Traumatismos em Atletas/prevenção & controle , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Previsões , Humanos , Movimento , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to develop and assess intra- and interrater reliability and validity of a clinical evaluation tool for breast cancer-related lymphedema, for use in the context of outcome evaluation in clinical trials. DESIGN: Blinded repeated measures observational study. SETTING: Outpatient research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Breast cancer survivors with and without lymphedema (N=71). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The assessment of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema of the Upper Extremity (CLUE) standardized clinical evaluation tool. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability for the CLUE tool was ICC: 0.88 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.71-0.96). Interrater reliability for the CLUE tool was ICC: 0.90 (95% CI, 0.79-0.95). Concurrent validity of the CLUE score (Pearson r) was 0.79 with perometric interlimb difference and 0.53 with the Norman lymphedema overall score. CONCLUSIONS: The CLUE tool shows excellent inter- and intrarater reliability. The overall CLUE score for the upper extremity also shows moderately strong concurrent validity with objective and subjective measures. This newly developed clinical, physical assessment of upper extremity lymphedema provides standardization and a single score that accounts for multiple constructs. Next steps include evaluation of sensitivity to change, which would establish usefulness to evaluate intervention efficacy.
Assuntos
Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/fisiopatologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Atividades Cotidianas , Pesos e Medidas Corporais , Feminino , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Simples-CegoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Individuals with short resting pectoralis minor muscle length have been shown to have aberrant scapulothoracic motion when compared to individuals with long resting pectoralis minor muscle length. However, the degree to which the pectoralis minor muscle can be lengthened and whether or not scapulothoracic motion differs between individuals with short and typical resting pectoralis minor muscle length is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine if: (1) pectoralis minor muscle elongation (percent pectoralis minor muscle can be actively and passively lengthened beyond resting length), (2) pectoralis minor muscle percent length change during overhead reaching, and (3) scapulothoracic motion during overhead reaching differ between individuals with short and typical resting pectoralis minor muscle length. DESIGN: Two group comparison. METHODS: Thirty healthy individuals were placed into a short or typical resting pectoralis minor muscle length group. A caliper was used to measure resting pectoralis minor muscle length and pectoralis minor muscle length during active and passive muscle lengthening. An electromagnetic tracking system was used to measure pectoralis minor muscle length change as well as scapular, humeral, and trunk motion during several arm elevation tasks. Pectoralis minor muscle elongation and length change during arm elevation tasks were compared between groups using independent t-tests. Two-factor mixed-model analyses of variance were used to compare scapulothoracic motion at arm elevation angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. RESULTS: Pectoralis minor muscle elongation and pectoralis minor muscle length change during arm elevation did not differ between groups. Scapulothoracic motion did not differ between groups across arm elevation tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Although resting pectoralis minor muscle length differed between groups, pectoralis minor muscle lengthening and scapulothoracic motion were similar between participants with short and typical resting pectoralis minor muscle length. Additional studies are needed to better understand the role of pectoralis minor muscle elongation on scapulothoracic motion.
Assuntos
Músculos Peitorais/fisiologia , Escápula/fisiologia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , DescansoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pectoralis minor muscle length is believed to play an important role in shoulder pain and dysfunction. Current clinical procedures for assessing pectoralis minor muscle length may not provide the most useful information for clinical decision making. OBJECTIVE: To establish the reliability and construct validity of a novel technique to measure pectoralis minor muscle length under actively and passively lengthened conditions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional repeated measures. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy adults (age: 23.9, SD=1.6 years; 18 females) participated in this study. Pectoralis minor muscle length was measured on the dominant arm in three length conditions: resting, actively lengthened, and passively lengthened. Based upon availability, two raters, out of a pool of five, used a caliper to measure the distance between the coracoid process and the 4th rib. The average of two pectoralis minor muscle length measures was used for all muscle length conditions and analyses. Intraclass correlation coefficients determined intra-and inter-rater reliability, and measurement error was determined via standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change. Construct validity was assessed by ANOVA to determine differences in muscle length across the three conditions. RESULTS: Our intra- and inter-rater reliability values across all three conditions ranged from 0.84 to 0.92 and from 0.80 to 0.90, respectively. Significant differences (p<0.001) in muscle length were found among all three conditions: rest-active (3.66; SD=1.36cm), rest-passive (4.72, SD=1.41cm), and active-passive (1.06, SD=0.47cm). CONCLUSIONS: The techniques described in this study for measuring pectoralis minor muscle length under resting and actively and passively lengthened conditions have acceptable reliability for clinical decision making.
Assuntos
Músculos Peitorais/fisiopatologia , Dor de Ombro/fisiopatologia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Exame Físico/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Programs designed to prevent or rehabilitate athletic injuries or improve athletic performance frequently focus on core stability. This approach is based upon the theory that poor core stability increases the risk of poor performance and/or injury. Despite the widespread use of core stability training amongst athletes, the question of whether or not sufficient evidence exists to support this practice remains to be answered. OBJECTIVES: 1) Open a dialogue on the definition and components of core stability. 2) Provide an overview of current science linking core stability to musculoskeletal injuries of the upper extremity. 3) Provide an overview of evidence for the association between core stability and athletic performance. DISCUSSION: Core stability is the ability to control the position and movement of the trunk for optimal production, transfer, and control of forces to and from the upper and lower extremities during functional activities. Muscle capacity and neuromuscular control are critical components of core stability. A limited body of evidence provides some support for a link between core stability and upper extremity injuries amongst athletes who participate in baseball, football, or swimming. Likewise, few studies exist to support a relationship between core stability and athletic performance. CONCLUSIONS: A limited body of evidence exists to support the use of core stability training in injury prevention or performance enhancement programs for athletes. Clearly more research is needed to inform decision making when it comes to inclusion or emphasis of core training when designing injury prevention and rehabilitation programs for athletes.
Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/fisiopatologia , Desempenho Atlético/fisiologia , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologia , Extremidade Superior/fisiologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , MovimentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Programs designed to prevent or rehabilitate athletic injuries or improve athletic performance frequently focus on core stability. This approach is based upon the theory that poor core stability increases the risk of poor performance and/or injury. Despite the widespread use of core stability training amongst athletes, the question of whether or not sufficient evidence exists to support this practice remains to be answered.OBJECTIVES: 1) Open a dialogue on the definition and components of core stability. 2) Provide an overview of current science linking core stability to musculoskeletal injuries of the upper extremity. 3) Provide an overview of evidence for the association between core stability and athletic performance.DISCUSSION: Core stability is the ability to control the position and movement of the trunk for optimal production, transfer, and control of forces to and from the upper and lower extremities during functional activities. Muscle capacity and neuromuscular control are critical components of core stability. A limited body of evidence provides some support for a link between core stability and upper extremity injuries amongst athletes who participate in baseball, football, or swimming. Likewise, few studies exist to support a relationship between core stability and athletic performance.CONCLUSIONS: A limited body of evidence exists to support the use of core stability training in injury prevention or performance enhancement programs for athletes. Clearly more research is needed to inform decision making when it comes to inclusion or emphasis of core training when designing injury prevention and rehabilitation programs for athletes.