RESUMO
Pediatric craniofacial fractures are fundamentally distinct from their adult counterparts because of unique injury patterns and effects on future growth. Understanding patterns and injury context informs management and risk mitigation. Previous studies include only inpatients, operative patients, or are specialty-specific. In contrast, our study presents a comprehensive assessment of all pediatric facial fracture patients seen at a single institution. Patients under 18 years old who were evaluated for facial fractures at a level I pediatric trauma center between 2006 and 2021 were reviewed. Subanalysis was performed for groups defined by age. Variables studied included demographics, etiology, fracture pattern, associated injuries, management, and outcomes. Three thousand thirty-four patients were included. Mean age at presentation was 11.5 to 4.9 years. The majority were Caucasian (82.6%) and male (68.4%). Sports were the leading cause of injury in older patients (42.2% of patients over 12 y), compared with activities of daily living in patients under 6 years (45.5%). Thirty-two percent of patients were hospitalized, 6.0% required ICU care, and 48.4% required surgery. Frequency of ICU admission decreased with age (P<0.001), whereas operative intervention increased with age (P<0.001). Zygomaticomaxillary complex (P=0.002) and nasal fractures (P<0.001) were common in older patients, whereas younger patients experienced more skull (P<0.001) and orbital fractures (P<0.001). The most associated injuries were soft tissue (55.7%) and neurologic (23.6%). This large-scale study provides updated characterization of craniofacial fractures in the pediatric population, providing a necessary framework for future studies on outcomes assessments and preventative care.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fractures impact growth of the craniofacial skeleton in children, which may necessitate differentiated management from adult injuries. This study describes characteristics, management, and outcomes of NOE fractures in children seen at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients under 18 years who presented to our institution from 2006 to 2021 with facial fractures was conducted; patients with NOE fractures were included. Data collected included demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture type, management, and outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 77.6% presented with Manson-Marcowitz Type I fractures, 17.2% with Type II, and 5.2% with Type III. The most common cause of injury was motor vehicle accidents (MVAs, 39.7%) and sports (31%). Glasgow Coma Scale and injury mechanism were not predictive of injury severity in the pediatric population ( P =0.353, P =0.493). Orbital fractures were the most common associated fractures (n=55, 94.8%); parietal bone fractures were more likely in Type III fractures ( P =0.047). LeFort III fractures were more likely in type II fractures ( P =0.011). Soft tissue and neurological injuries were the most common associated injuries regardless of NOE fracture type (81% and 58.6%, respectively). There was no significant difference in type of operative management or in the rates of adverse outcomes between types of NOE fractures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pediatric NOE fractures, although rare, present differently from adult NOE fractures and that revisiting predictive heuristics and treatment strategies is warranted in this population.
Assuntos
Fraturas Múltiplas , Fraturas Maxilares , Fraturas Orbitárias , Fraturas Cranianas , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Fraturas Orbitárias/epidemiologia , Fraturas Orbitárias/cirurgia , Fraturas Orbitárias/complicações , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Osso Nasal/lesões , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Múltiplas/complicaçõesRESUMO
In 1991, Dr Paul Schnur and his colleagues published an article correlating the weight of breast tissue to be removed in a breast reduction operation with the total body surface area (BSA) of the patient. They presented a very cogent argument for selecting three groups of patients: those with medical indications for operation, those who merit review, and those whose operation could be considered cosmetic. The Schnur Sliding Scale is widely used by insurance companies in the western United States in the process of preauthorizing breast reduction operations, and its use may be spreading eastward. The Schnur group presented a nomogram for calculating BSA and a scale in the form of a table for guiding a determination of whether the patient is a reconstructive patient as opposed to an aesthetic patient. We have combined the scale and the BSA nomogram for a simplified nomogram calculator that facilitates rapid determination of anticipated tissue weight of resection for a patient of a given size. This calculator yields the required weight of tissue to remove with just knowledge of the patient's height and weight and the use of a straight edge. We demonstrate and compare performance of this calculation by hand and by nomogram. There is ample evidence that the practice of applying the Schnur Sliding Scale may be prohibitive to symptomatic patients seeking reduction mammaplasty and should be abandoned. While this practice continues, our simplified Schnur Sliding Scale nomogram is meant to help easily determine the insurer-required minimum breast resection weight and thereby both improve patient counseling prior to planning surgery and assist the surgeon with achieving insurer reimbursement for the procedure while avoiding rejected claims.