Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(29): 4664-4668, 2023 10 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37290029

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Self-administered oncology drugs contribute disproportionately to Medicare Part D spending; prices often remain high even after generic entry. Outlets for low-cost drugs such as Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) offer opportunities for decreased Medicare, Part D, and beneficiary spending. We estimate potential savings if Part D plans obtained prices such as those offered under the MCCPDC for seven generic oncology drugs. METHODS: Using the 2020 Medicare Part D Spending dashboard, Q3-2022 Part D formulary prices, and Q3-2022 MCCPDC prices for seven self-administered generic oncology drugs, we estimated Medicare savings by replacing Q3-2022 Part D unit costs with costs under the MCCPDC plan. RESULTS: We estimate potential savings of $661.8 million (M) US dollars (USD; 78.8%) for the seven oncology drugs studied. Total savings ranged from $228.1M USD (56.1%) to $2,154.5M USD (92.4%) compared with 25th and 75th percentiles of Part D plan unit prices. The median savings replacing Part D plan prices were abiraterone $338.0M USD, anastrozole $1.2M USD, imatinib 100 mg $15.6M USD, imatinib 400 mg $212.0M USD, letrozole $1.9M USD, methotrexate $26.7M USD, raloxifene $63.8M USD, and tamoxifen $2.6M USD. All 30-day prescription drug prices offered by MCCPDC generated cost savings except for three drugs offered at the 25th percentile Part D formulary pricing: anastrozole, letrozole, and tamoxifen. CONCLUSION: Replacing current Part D median formulary prices with MCCPDC pricing could yield significant savings for seven generic oncology drugs. Individual beneficiaries could save nearly $25,200 USD per year for abiraterone or between $17,500 USD and $20,500 USD for imatinib. Notably, Part D cash-pay prices for abiraterone and imatinib under the catastrophic phase of coverage were still more expensive than baseline MCCPDC prices.


Assuntos
Medicare Part D , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Idoso , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicamentos Genéricos , Anastrozol , Mesilato de Imatinib , Letrozol , Custos de Medicamentos , Tamoxifeno , Redução de Custos
2.
Diabetes Care ; 43(9): 2121-2127, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641378

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Using the 2016 Medicare Part D coverage gap as an example, we explored effects of increased out-of-pocket costs on adherence to branded dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in patients without financial subsidies relative to subsidized patients who do not experience increased spending during the gap. We also explored seasonality of reinitiation, because discontinuers may be more likely to reinitiate in January when benefits reset. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified DPP-4i or sulfonylurea initiators, aged ≥66 years, from a 20% sample of 2015-2016 Medicare claims. Difference-in-differences Poisson regression was used to compare adherence before and after entering the coverage gap between nonsubsidized and subsidized patients. Among discontinuers, monthly hazard ratios (HRs) for reinitiation relative to January 2016 were derived with Cox models. As a second control, we repeated analyses using sulfonylureas, generic low-cost alternatives. RESULTS: In 2016, 8,096 subsidized and 6,173 nonsubsidized DPP-4i initiators entered the coverage gap. For nonsubsidized patients, copayment in the coverage gap was 45% ($227 per DPP-4i prescription), and adherence decreased from 68.4% to 49.0% after gap entry. Accounting for adherence differences in subsidized patients, nonsubsidized patients demonstrated reduced adherence to DPP-4i (difference-in-difference: -16.9%; 95% CI -18.7%, -15.1%) but not sulfonylureas (-1.6%; 95% CI -3.4%, 0.2%). Reinitiation was lowest in the months before January (HR 0.4-0.5) among nonsubsidized DPP-4i patients, demonstrating a strong seasonal pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Increased out-of-pocket costs negatively affect adherence and reinitiation of branded antihyperglycemic drugs among patients without financial subsidies. Despite closure of the coverage gap, affordability remains a concern given increasing list prices for many drugs on Medicare and the growing use of deductibles and coinsurance by commercial health plans.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Custos de Medicamentos , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Medicare Part D , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/economia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare Part D/economia , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/economia , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
J Pediatr ; 195: 161-168.e7, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29395178

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the patterns of prescription drug use among child and adolescent survivors of cancer in the early post-therapy period compared with matched peers without a cancer history. STUDY DESIGN: Using the MarketScan commercial insurance claims database, we performed a retrospective cohort study identifying survivors of pediatric (0-21 years of age at diagnosis) leukemia, lymphoma, central nervous system, bone, or gonadal cancers who completed therapy from 2000 to 2011 and remained insured for 3 years post-therapy. Prescription fills during the first 3 years post-therapy were examined, categorized by drug class, and compared with age-, sex-, and region-matched individuals without cancer. RESULTS: We identified 1414 survivors and 14 007 comparators. Compared with those without cancer, survivors had 1.5-4.5 times greater risk for filling opioids. Survivors of leukemia, lymphoma, central nervous system, and bone cancers had 2-5 times the risk for antidepressant and 3-7 times the risk for anxiolytic use. Survivors of leukemia, lymphoma, and bone tumors had 3-13 times the risk for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors by the third year post-therapy. CONCLUSION: Compared with peers without cancer, survivors of childhood cancer have greater rates of prescription use across many drug classes, suggesting greater medical morbidity. Survivors were more likely to use opioid, psychoactive, hormone, and cardiovascular medications. All general pediatricians and subspecialists should be aware of potentially emerging morbidities during the early post-therapy period to guide risk-based surveillance and survivorship care.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA