RESUMO
The prevalence of risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis were studied in two population samples, Northeast (Posadas, n = 498) and South (Viedma, C. Rivadavia and Cipolletti, n = 652) of 20 years and older, males and females. The diet in the Northeast (n = 102) contained more monounsaturated acids and polyunsaturated acids than the one in the South (n = 62), 9.5 +/- 4.1 vs. 8.1 +/- 3.5% TCV (Total Caloric Value) (P < 0.02) and 8.1 +/- 4.1 vs. 6.2 +/- 3.0% TCV (P < 0.001) respectively. The P/S relationship was greater in the Northeast, 1.02 +/- 0.44 vs. 0.85 +/- 0.50 (P < 0.001). Total cholesterol (TC) in the Northeast was less than in the South, in males 176 +/- 41 vs. 213 +/- 43 mg/dl (P < 0.001); CLDL (LDL cholesterol) 109 +/- 37 vs. 141 +/- 41 mg/dl (P < 0.001). The most frequent risk factors in the South vs. Northeast (males) were: TC > or = 240 mg/dl, 26.7% vs. 9.5% (P < 0.001); LDL-C > or = 160 mg/dl, 30.3% vs. 10.9% (P < 0.001); Cig > or = 10/d (equal or more than 10 cigarettes per day), 30.0% vs. 16.4% (P < 0.001). The hypertension prevalence (HTA, 160/95), in males, was higher in the Northeast than in the South, 23.7% vs. 11.5% (P < 0.001). BMI > 27 Kg/m2 was higher in the women of Northeast than in the South, 38.4% vs. 24.2% (P < 0.001). In the males of the Northeast, the combination Cig > or = 10/d and HTA, 4.1 vs 0.9% was more common; in the South Cig > or = 10/d and LDL-C > or = 160 mg/d, 8.2% vs. 1.8% (P < 0.001) was more common. The differences in the prevalence of the risk factors between the population samples indicate the need to plan the prevention of coronary atherosclerosis locally.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Argentina/epidemiologia , Pressão Sanguínea , Índice de Massa Corporal , Colesterol/sangue , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/sangue , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Dieta , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Triglicerídeos/sangueRESUMO
The prevalence of risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis were studied in two population samples, Northeast (Posadas, n = 498) and South (Viedma, C. Rivadavia and Cipolletti, n = 652) of 20 years and older, males and females. The diet in the Northeast (n = 102) contained more monounsaturated acids and polyunsaturated acids than the one in the South (n = 62), 9.5 +/- 4.1 vs. 8.1 +/- 3.5
TCV (Total Caloric Value) (P < 0.02) and 8.1 +/- 4.1 vs. 6.2 +/- 3.0
TCV (P < 0.001) respectively. The P/S relationship was greater in the Northeast, 1.02 +/- 0.44 vs. 0.85 +/- 0.50 (P < 0.001). Total cholesterol (TC) in the Northeast was less than in the South, in males 176 +/- 41 vs. 213 +/- 43 mg/dl (P < 0.001); CLDL (LDL cholesterol) 109 +/- 37 vs. 141 +/- 41 mg/dl (P < 0.001). The most frequent risk factors in the South vs. Northeast (males) were: TC > or = 240 mg/dl, 26.7
vs. 9.5
(P < 0.001); LDL-C > or = 160 mg/dl, 30.3
vs. 10.9
(P < 0.001); Cig > or = 10/d (equal or more than 10 cigarettes per day), 30.0
vs. 16.4
(P < 0.001). The hypertension prevalence (HTA, 160/95), in males, was higher in the Northeast than in the South, 23.7
vs. 11.5
(P < 0.001). BMI > 27 Kg/m2 was higher in the women of Northeast than in the South, 38.4
vs. 24.2
(P < 0.001). In the males of the Northeast, the combination Cig > or = 10/d and HTA, 4.1 vs 0.9
was more common; in the South Cig > or = 10/d and LDL-C > or = 160 mg/d, 8.2
vs. 1.8
(P < 0.001) was more common. The differences in the prevalence of the risk factors between the population samples indicate the need to plan the prevention of coronary atherosclerosis locally.
RESUMO
Se realizó un estudio clínico, cardiológico, bioquímico y nutricional para determinar factores de riesgo. Se compararon individuos de un área rural, Comi-Có (N=92), en su mayoría descendientes de Mapuches, con un grupo urbano de Viedma (N=94). Se analizó la carne ovina, caprina y equina de la zona rural. La brasa intramuscular equina fue 1,16g//, con 34,5// de AG poliinsaturados (linolénico 11,9//). La dieta rural fue diferente de la urbana (p < 0,001): calorías totales 3420 ñ 1027 vs 2110 ñ 654 Kcal, hidratos carbono 40 ñ 8 vs 55 ñ 10//, lípidos 33 ñ 5 vs 24 ñ 8//, proteínas 28 ñ 9 vs 20 ñ 6//, colesterol 1021 ñ 380 vs 385 ñ 156 mg/d. Los rurales tenían tendencia a la patología biliar. Los varones de Comi-Có vs Viedma tenían C-HDL 53 ñ 13 vs 47 ñ 9 mg/dl (p < 0,05) y no se observaron diferencias en las medidas para CT, CLDL, TG, Apo B y Acido Urico. La frecuencia de: CT ò 240 mg/dl, CLDL, ò 160 mg/dl y cigarrillos ò 10/día pareció ser menor en los individuos rurales. En varones de Videma vs Como-Có con un factor principal se halló 45// vs 24// (p < 0,05). La proporción con dos factores fue baja. No se hallaron individuos con tres factores. Puede concluirse para estas muestras : 1) La dieta rica en carnes rojas del área rural patagónica no aumentó los niveles lipídicos en sangre; la frecuencia de los factores e indicadores de riesgo en la muestra rural no fue mayor que en la urbana. 2) El estilo de vida y factores étnicos podrían condicionar el efecto de la dieta sobre los lípidos sanguíneos
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Dieta , Argentina , Comportamento Alimentar , Lipídeos/sangue , Carne/análise , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Se realizó un estudio clínico, cardiológico, bioquímico y nutricional para determinar factores de riesgo. Se compararon individuos de un área rural, Comi-Có (N=92), en su mayoría descendientes de Mapuches, con un grupo urbano de Viedma (N=94). Se analizó la carne ovina, caprina y equina de la zona rural. La brasa intramuscular equina fue 1,16g//, con 34,5// de AG poliinsaturados (linolénico 11,9//). La dieta rural fue diferente de la urbana (p < 0,001): calorías totales 3420 ñ 1027 vs 2110 ñ 654 Kcal, hidratos carbono 40 ñ 8 vs 55 ñ 10//, lípidos 33 ñ 5 vs 24 ñ 8//, proteínas 28 ñ 9 vs 20 ñ 6//, colesterol 1021 ñ 380 vs 385 ñ 156 mg/d. Los rurales tenían tendencia a la patología biliar. Los varones de Comi-Có vs Viedma tenían C-HDL 53 ñ 13 vs 47 ñ 9 mg/dl (p < 0,05) y no se observaron diferencias en las medidas para CT, CLDL, TG, Apo B y Acido Urico. La frecuencia de: CT ò 240 mg/dl, CLDL, ò 160 mg/dl y cigarrillos ò 10/día pareció ser menor en los individuos rurales. En varones de Videma vs Como-Có con un factor principal se halló 45// vs 24// (p < 0,05). La proporción con dos factores fue baja. No se hallaron individuos con tres factores. Puede concluirse para estas muestras : 1) La dieta rica en carnes rojas del área rural patagónica no aumentó los niveles lipídicos en sangre; la frecuencia de los factores e indicadores de riesgo en la muestra rural no fue mayor que en la urbana. 2) El estilo de vida y factores étnicos podrían condicionar el efecto de la dieta sobre los lípidos sanguíneos (AU)
Assuntos
Estudo Comparativo , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dieta , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Comportamento Alimentar , Carne/análise , Lipídeos/sangue , Fatores de Risco , ArgentinaRESUMO
To determine risk factors, a clinical, cardiologic, biochemical and nutritional study was carried out. A sample of the rural population of Comi-Co (N = 92), which included descendants of Mapuche indians, was compared with a sample of the urban population of Viedma (N = 94). Sheep, goat and horse meat from the rural district was analyzed. In horse meat, intramuscular fat was 1.16 g%, with 34.5% of polyunsaturated fatty acids including linolenic (18:3 w3) 11.9%, linoleic (18:2 w6) 21.0%. The diet intake of the rural population was very different from that of the urban population (p < 0.001). It contained 3420 +/- 1027 vs 2110 +/- 654 kcal, carbohydrates 40 +/- 8 vs 55 +/- 10%, lipids 33 +/- 5 vs 24 +/- 8%, proteins 28 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 6%, cholesterol 1021 +/- 380 vs 385 +/- 156 mg/day. The rural population showed a tendency to suffer cholelithiasis. Comi-Co vs Videma males had a CHDL 53 +/- 13 vs 47 +/- 9 mg/dl (p < 0.05) and no significant differences were found between both groups when it came to blood glucose, uric acid, triglycerides and Apo B. The frequency of individuals with CT > or = 240 mg/dl, CLDL > or = 160 mg/dl, cigarettes > or = 10/day seems to be less in the rural district. In Viedma vs Comi-Co males, with any one primary factor there was a ratio of 45% vs 24% (p < 0.05). The proportion of males with two risk factors was low. No individuals with three risk factors were found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Dieta Aterogênica , Adulto , Argentina , Comportamento Alimentar , Feminino , Humanos , Lipídeos/sangue , Masculino , Carne/análise , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Saúde da População Rural , Saúde da População UrbanaRESUMO
To determine risk factors, a clinical, cardiologic, biochemical and nutritional study was carried out. A sample of the rural population of Comi-Co (N = 92), which included descendants of Mapuche indians, was compared with a sample of the urban population of Viedma (N = 94). Sheep, goat and horse meat from the rural district was analyzed. In horse meat, intramuscular fat was 1.16 g
, with 34.5
of polyunsaturated fatty acids including linolenic (18:3 w3) 11.9
, linoleic (18:2 w6) 21.0
. The diet intake of the rural population was very different from that of the urban population (p < 0.001). It contained 3420 +/- 1027 vs 2110 +/- 654 kcal, carbohydrates 40 +/- 8 vs 55 +/- 10
, lipids 33 +/- 5 vs 24 +/- 8
, proteins 28 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 6
, cholesterol 1021 +/- 380 vs 385 +/- 156 mg/day. The rural population showed a tendency to suffer cholelithiasis. Comi-Co vs Videma males had a CHDL 53 +/- 13 vs 47 +/- 9 mg/dl (p < 0.05) and no significant differences were found between both groups when it came to blood glucose, uric acid, triglycerides and Apo B. The frequency of individuals with CT > or = 240 mg/dl, CLDL > or = 160 mg/dl, cigarettes > or = 10/day seems to be less in the rural district. In Viedma vs Comi-Co males, with any one primary factor there was a ratio of 45
vs 24
(p < 0.05). The proportion of males with two risk factors was low. No individuals with three risk factors were found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)