RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic surgery has been increasingly used in breast cancer treatment and allows the performance of breast-conserving surgery in cases of larger tumors with unfavorable location or tumor-breast disproportion. PURPOSE: To compare surgical and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing oncoplastic and nononcoplastic breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with convenience sampling of 866 patients who consecutively underwent breast-conserving surgery from 2011 to 2015. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 50.4 months. Nononcoplastic breast conservation surgery was performed on 768 (88.7%) patients and oncoplastic surgery on 98 (11.3%) patients. Patients in the oncoplastic group were younger (p<0.0001) and most were premenopausal (p<0.0001). Comorbidities such as diabetes (p=0.003) and hypertension (p=0.0001) were less frequent in this population. Invasive carcinoma >2 cm (p<0.0001), multifocality (p=0.004), ductal in situ carcinoma (p=0.0007), clinically positive axilla (p=0.004), and greater weight of surgical specimens (p<0.0001) were more frequent in the oncoplastic group. A second surgery for margin re-excision was more frequently performed in the nononcoplastic group (p=0.027). There was more scar dehiscence in the oncoplastic group (p<0.001), but there was no difference in early major complications (p=0.854), conversion to mastectomy (p=0.92), or local recurrence (p=0.889). CONCLUSION: Although used for the treatment of larger and multifocal tumors, surgical re-excisions were performed less often in the oncoplastic group, and there was no increase in conversion to mastectomy or local recurrence. In spite of the higher rate of overall complications in the oncoplastic group, major complications were similar in both groups.
RESUMO
The sub-nipple tissue (SNT) examination has been used by surgeons to preserve, or not, the nipple in nipple-sparing mastectomy. However, it is uncertain whether SNT evaluation can predict nipple involvement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the intraoperative frozen section and imprint cytology, and permanent histology of SNT to predict the involvement of the nipple in breast carcinoma and to compare the three exams. A prospective study was performed with 68 consecutive breast carcinoma women who had undergone mastectomy or central segmentectomy (removing nipple-areolar complex). After surgery, the nipple-areolar complex was dissected simulating a nipple-sparing flap (ex vivo). The SNT was subsequently removed and submitted to frozen section, imprint cytology, and permanent histology. The nipple was examined separately by paraffin histopathology and was considered the gold standard. The occult nipple involvement rate was 11.7 %. The frozen section, cytology, and permanent histology of SNT presented accuracy 86.8, 76.5, and 86.8 %; sensitivity 50, 37.5, and 62.5 %; specificity 91.7, 81.7, and 90 %; PPV 44.4, 21.4, and 45.5 %; and NPV 93.2, 90.7, and 94.7 %, respectively. The accuracy of the frozen section was similar to that of permanent histology (p = 0.77) and both were better than cytology (p = 0.01). False negative rates were 6.8 % for frozen section, 9.3 % for cytology and 5.3 % for paraffin. SNT evaluation is a good method for predicting occult nipple involvement; the outcomes showed a good accuracy and low false negative rate for the frozen section, cytology, and permanent histology exams. When we compared the exams, the frozen section was similar to permanent histology and more accurate than imprint cytology.