RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of hypertension (HTN) is high in Brazil, and control rates are low. Little is known about the factors that contribute to HTN control from a family-based perspective. OBJECTIVES: Guided by the family management style framework, specific aims were to (1) describe the prevalence of adequate blood pressure (BP) control in individuals cared for the Family Health Strategy, (2) identify facilitators and barriers to HTN management, and (3) identify individual contextual sociocultural influences (sociocultural context and social and Family Health Strategy support), definition of the situation, and management behaviors that help or interfere with individual functioning (BP control in the individual with HTN). METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study included 213 individuals with HTN randomly selected from 3 Family Health Strategy units from July 2016 until July 2017. RESULTS: Most of the individuals were female (n = 139, 65.3%), retired (n = 129, 60.5%), and White (n = 129, 60.2%) and had less than a high school education (n = 123, 57.6%). Family income (n = 166, 77.8%) was less than 5500 reals (US $1117/month). Mean (SD) systolic BP was 137.1 (±24.1) mm Hg, and mean (SD) diastolic BP was 83.8 (±18.6) mm Hg, with 47.9% (n = 102) having uncontrolled BP. In the multivariate logistic model, only high levels of perceived social support were significantly associated (odds ratio, 3.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-7.5; P = .005) with controlled BP. CONCLUSIONS: Social support is strongly associated with BP control. Optimizing support may play an important role in BP control and preventing HTN-related complications.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Poor self-care in patients with hypertension is associated with worse patient outcomes. The Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory (SC-HI) measures self-care in patients with hypertension and includes three scales: self-care maintenance, which measures adherence to prescribed treatments and behaviors; self-care management, which evaluates the responses to signs and symptoms of high blood pressure; and self-care confidence, which measures self-efficacy in dealing with the entire process. OBJECTIVE: To test the psychometric characteristics of the Brazilian version of the SC-HI. METHODS: We enrolled a sample of 360 patients with hypertension and performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to test the factorial structure of the SC-HI and computed the factor score determinacy coefficient to evaluate the SC-HI internal consistency reliability. RESULTS: The sample was predominantly female (65%), mean age of 65 years (SD = 10), white (70%). The self-care maintenance scale resulted in a unidimensional scale, with supportive fit indices (CFI = 0.901, RMSEA = 0.048); the self-care management did not reflect the original factorial structure and had unsupportive fit indices. EFA showed a different factorial solution in reference to the original study. Finally, the self-care confidence scale resulted in a unidimensional scale with supportive fit indices (CFI = 0.940, RMSEA = 0.093). The reliability of the self-care maintenance, management, and confidence scales resulted in factor score determinacy coefficients of 0.83, 0.78, and 0.97 respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the SC-HI is a valid and reliable tool to measure self-care in patients with hypertension among the Brazilian population.
Assuntos
Hipertensão , Autocuidado , Idoso , Brasil , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/terapia , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle changes and treatment adherence still constitute a challenge to healthcare providers involved in the care of persons with hypertension. The lack of validated instruments measuring the ability of hypertensive patients to manage their disease has slowed research progress in this area. The Self-care of Hypertension Inventory, originally developed in the United States, consists of 23 items divided across 3 scales: Self-care Maintenance, Self-care Management, and Self-care Confidence. These scales measure how well patients with hypertension adhere to treatment and manage elevated blood pressure, as well as their confidence in their ability to perform self-care. A rigorous cross-cultural adaptation and validation process is required before this instrument can be used in other countries. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to translate the Self-care of Hypertension Inventory into Brazilian Portuguese with cross-cultural adaptation and to evaluate interobserver reliability and temporal stability. METHODS: This methodological study involved forward translation, synthesis of forward translations, back-translation, synthesis of back-translations, expert committee review, and pretesting. Interobserver agreement and the temporal stability of the scales were assessed. RESULTS: The expert committee proposed semantic and cultural modifications to some items and the addition of guidance statements to facilitate administration of the scale. Interobserver analysis demonstrated substantial agreement. Analysis of temporal stability showed near-perfect agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-cultural adaptation of the Self-care of Hypertension Inventory successfully produced a Portuguese-language version of the instrument for further evaluation of psychometric properties. Once that step is completed, the scale can be used in Brazil.
Assuntos
Hipertensão/etnologia , Hipertensão/terapia , Autocuidado , Traduções , Idoso , Brasil , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) self-care is poor in developed countries like the United States, but little is known about self-care in developing countries. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2082 adults from 2 developed (United States and Australia) and 2 developing countries (Thailand and Mexico) were studied in a descriptive, comparative study. Self-care was measured using the Self-Care of HF Index, which provided scores on self-care maintenance, management, and confidence. Data were analyzed using regression analysis after demographic (age, gender, education), clinical (functional status, experience with the diagnosis, comorbid conditions), and setting of enrollment (hospital or clinic) differences were controlled. When adequate self-care was defined as a standardized score >or=70%, self-care was inadequate in most scales in most groups. Self-care maintenance was highest in the Australian sample and lowest in the Thai sample (P < .001). Self-care management was highest in the US sample and lowest in the Thai sample (P < .001). Self-care confidence was highest in the Mexican sample and lowest in the Thai sample (P < .001). Determinants differed for the three types of self-care (eg, experience with HF was associated only with self-care maintenance). CONCLUSION: Interventions aimed at improving self-care are greatly needed in both the developed and the developing countries studied.