RESUMO

Adrenaline (epinephrine) is the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis and, therefore, is listed as an essential medication for the treatment of anaphylaxis by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, the availability of adrenaline autoinjectors (AAI) for use as first-aid treatment is limited to only 32% of all the world's 195 countries, most of which are high-income countries. The key issues leading to the lack of availability of AAIs include cost, national regulations, lack of regional evidence on the value of epinephrine, and limited accurate data about the epidemiology of anaphylaxis. For these reasons, regional and international allergy academies support initiatives to narrow these gaps. Our WHO Collaborating Centre is deeply involved in this process. This document aims to serve as a baseline to ensure the following: (1) adequate access to affordable autoinjectors for all patients/societies; and (2) the development of disease-/patient-specific approaches. Therefore, we propose a 5-step action plan that aims to gather accurate epidemiological data on anaphylaxis and autoinjector consumption, confirm partnerships, strengthen awareness, and include AAIs in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. These aspects should be considered in combination. A prioritized research agenda should encapsulate all these steps within the framework a global initiative against anaphylaxis. More than calling for universal availability of autoinjectors for optimal management of anaphylaxis, we propose an action plan as the baseline for a global initiative against anaphylaxis. We strongly believe that combined efforts will ensure a strong public health and societal approach that will lead to optimal care of allergic patients and best practices in allergology.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) represent growing health problem worldwide, affecting more than 7% of the general population, and represent an important public health problem. However, knowledge in DHRs morbidity and mortality epidemiological data is still not optimal and international comparable standards remain poorly accessed. Institutional databases worldwide increasingly use the WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system to classify diagnoses, health services utilization, and death data. The misclassification of disorders in the ICD system contributes to a lack of ascertainment and recognition of their importance for healthcare planning and resource allocation. It also hampers clinical practice and prevention actions. To further inform the allergy community and to ensure that the revision process is transparent as advised in the WHO ICD-11 revision agenda, we report the advances and use of the pioneering "Drug hypersensitivity" subsection of ICD-11 and implementation in the WHO International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI). The new classification addressed to DHRs will enable the collection of more accurate epidemiological data to support quality management of patients with drug allergies and better facilitate healthcare planning and decision-making and public health measures to prevent and reduce the morbidity and mortality attributable to DHRs.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To consolidate the new classification model addressed to the allergic and hypersensitivity conditions according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 revision timeline, we here propose real-life application of quality assurance methodology to evaluate sensitivity and accuracy of the 'Anaphylaxis' subsection. METHODS: We applied field-testing methodology by analysing all the consecutive inpatients' files documented as allergies from the University Hospital of Montpellier electronic database for the period of 1 year. The files clinically validated as being anaphylaxis were manually blind-coded under ICD-10 and current ICD-11 beta draft. The correspondence of coding and the impressions regarding sensibility were evaluated. RESULTS: From all 2318 files related to allergic or hypersensitivity conditions, 673 had some of the anaphylaxis ICD-10 codes; 309 files (46%) from 209 patients had anaphylaxis and allergic or hypersensitivity comorbidities description. The correspondence between the two coders was perfect for 162 codes from all 309 entities (52.4%) (Cohen-kappa value 0.63) with the ICD-10 and for 221 codes (71.5%) (Cohen-kappa value 0.77) with the ICD-11. There was a high agreement regarding sensibility of the ICD-11 usability (Cohen-kappa value 0.75). CONCLUSION: We here propose the first attempt of real-life application to validate the new ICD-11 'Anaphylaxis' subsection. Clearer was the improvement in accuracy reaching 71.5% of agreement when ICD-11 was used. By allowing all the relevant diagnostic terms for anaphylaxis to be included into the ICD-11 framework, WHO has recognized their importance not only to clinicians but also to epidemiologists, statisticians, healthcare planners and other stakeholders.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2012, an analysis of the Brazilian mortality database demonstrated undernotification of anaphylaxis deaths due, at least in part, to difficult coding under the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10. This work triggered a cascade of strategic international actions supported by the Joint Allergy Academies and the ICD World Health Organization (WHO) representatives to update the classifications of allergic disorders for the ICD-11 revision. These efforts have resulted in the construction of the new 'Allergic and hypersensitivity conditions' section under the 'Disorders of the Immune system' chapter. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the capacity of the new ICD-11 revision to capture anaphylaxis deaths. METHODS: We re-estimated the anaphylaxis deaths that occurred in Brazil during the period 2008 to 2010, utilizing this new framework and the database of the Brazilian mortality information system that had initially been extracted in May 2011. However, in 2016, a manual review of each of the 3638 records was performed. RESULTS: We identified 639 anaphylaxis deaths, of which 95% were classified as 'definitive anaphylaxis deaths'. In contrast to the 2012 published data, we found a higher number of cases; moreover, all 606 definitive anaphylaxis deaths would be considered as underlying causes of death utilizing the ICD-11 revision. CONCLUSION: This study is the first example of how the new 'Allergic and hypersensitivity conditions' section of the forthcoming ICD-11 can improve the quality of official vital statistics data and the visibility of an important public health concern. This research will facilitate comprehensive, comparable population-based epidemiologic data collection on anaphylaxis.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since 2013, an international collaboration of Allergy Academies, including first the World Allergy Organization (WAO), the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI), and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), and then the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI), the Latin American Society of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (SLAAI), and the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI), has spent tremendous efforts to have a better and updated classification of allergic and hypersensitivity conditions in the forthcoming International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 version by providing evidences and promoting actions for the need for changes. The latest action was the implementation of a classification proposal of hypersensitivity/allergic diseases built by crowdsourcing the Allergy Academy leaderships. METHODS: Following bilateral discussions with the representatives of the ICD-11 revision, a face-to-face meeting was held at the United Nations Office in Geneva and a simplification process of the hypersensitivity/allergic disorders classification was carried out to better fit the ICD structure. RESULTS: We are here presenting the end result of what we consider to be a model of good collaboration between the World Health Organization and a specialty. CONCLUSION: We strongly believe that the outcomes of all past and future actions will impact positively the recognition of the allergy specialty as well as the quality improvement of healthcare system for allergic and hypersensitivity conditions worldwide.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The global allergy community strongly believes that the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) offers a unique opportunity to improve the classification and coding of hypersensitivity/allergic diseases via inclusion of a specific chapter dedicated to this disease area to facilitate epidemiological studies, as well as to evaluate the true size of the allergy epidemic. In this context, an international collaboration has decided to revise the classification of hypersensitivity/allergic diseases and to validate it for ICD-11 by crowdsourcing the allergist community. After careful comparison between ICD-10 and 11 beta phase linearization codes, we identified gaps and trade-offs allowing us to construct a classification proposal, which was sent to the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) sections, interest groups, executive committee as well as the World Allergy Organization (WAO), and American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) leaderships. The crowdsourcing process produced comments from 50 of 171 members contacted by e-mail. The classification proposal has also been discussed at face-to-face meetings with experts of EAACI sections and interest groups and presented in a number of business meetings during the 2014 EAACI annual congress in Copenhagen. As a result, a high-level complex structure of classification for hypersensitivity/allergic diseases has been constructed. The model proposed has been presented to the WHO groups in charge of the ICD revision. The international collaboration of allergy experts appreciates bilateral discussion and aims to get endorsement of their proposals for the final ICD-11.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Undernotification is well recognized as a key challenge to the study of anaphylaxis mortality, but it is seldom mentioned that one of its reasons is the difficult coding of the condition under the tenth revision of the international classification of diseases (ICD-10), given that there are no anaphylaxis-specific ICD-10, which are considered valid for coding underlying causes-of-death, and that official mortality statistics consider exclusively the underlying and disregard the contributing causes-of-death data recorded on death certificates. Brazilian mortality data were used as a case study to call attention to the inadequacy of the ICD-10 for the measurement of anaphylaxis deaths. METHODS: Underlying and contributing causes-of-death data were used to estimate the rates of anaphylaxis deaths in the country over the years 2008-2010. RESULTS: Of 498 anaphylaxis deaths were found, of which 75% were classified as 'definite' and 25% as 'possible anaphylaxis deaths'. The average national rate for these years was 0.87 per million per year. None of these deaths would have been found had we exclusively considered information from the underlying cause-of-death field. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONS: The study of anaphylaxis mortality using secondary data requires the use of information derived from the underlying as well as from the contributing causes-of-death fields. Coding definitions should be standardized with a view of enabling trend analyses and international comparisons. The ICD-11 revision is a unique opportunity to improve the coding system so as to facilitate epidemiological studies of anaphylaxis mortality. Educational interventions targeted at improving the quality of death certificate completion are urgently needed.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Antecedentes. El hecho de que tanto Hollister-Stier como Allergopharma haya cesado la producción de penicilil-polilisina (PPL) y la mezcla de determinantes menores (MDM) en 2004, es un obstáculo importante en el diagnóstico de la hipersensibilidad a los ß-lactámicos y puede producir consecuencias negativas. Objetivo. Evaluar la contribución de las pruebas cutáneas con bencilpenicilina para el diagnóstico de la hipersensibilidad a penicilina mediada por IgE, con el fin de determinar cuánto podría compensar esta prueba cutánea la falta de disponibilidad de PPL y MDM. Métodos. Se seleccionaron pacientes con antecedentes de reacciones inmediatas a penicilina y test cutáneo para uno o más reactivos de penicilina (PPL, MDM o bencilpenicilina), una o más penicilinas semisintéticas (ampicilina, amoxicilina o piperacilina) o ambos. Resultados. Se seleccionaron en total 300 pacientes, 105 en el centro de Francia y 195 en los centros italianos. Las principales drogas responsables fueron la amoxicilina y ampicilina. La manifestación clínica más común fue la anafilaxia. Las pruebas cutáneas más frecuentemente positivas fueron con amoxicilina (188; 62,7%), ampicilina (151; 50,3%) y bencilpenicilina (111; 37,0%). Entre los 300 sujetos, 113 (37,7%) fueron positivos sólo para las penicilinas semisintéticas, 109 (36,3%) a ambas penicilinas semi-sintéticas y el clásico reactivo penicilina y 78 (26,0%) sólo a este último. En el último grupo, 64 (21,3% de los 300 sujetos) fueron positivos sólo a PPL y/o MDM y 14 (4,7%) a bencilpenicilina, de los cuales 8 (2,7%) fueron positivos sólo a este último Conclusiones. Las pruebas cutáneas con bencilpenicilina pueden compensar en parte la falta de PPL y de MDM. Por otra parte, puede aumentar ligeramente la sensibilidad del estudio diagnóstico alergológico y, por lo tanto, reducir el número de desafíos potencialmente peligrosos(AU)

Assuntos