RESUMO
Purpose: To develop and evaluate the capabilities of a dynamic elbow testing apparatus that simulates unconstrained elbow motion throughout the range of humerothoracic (HTA) abduction. Methods: Elbow flexion was generated by six computer-controlled electromechanical actuators that simulated muscle action, while six degree-of-freedom joint motion was measured using an optical tracking device. Repeatability of joint kinematics was assessed at four HTA angles (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°) and with two muscle force combinations (A1-biceps brachialis, brachioradialis and A2-biceps, brachioradialis). Repeatability was determined by comparing kinematics at every 10° of flexion over five flexion-extension cycles (0° to 100°). Results: Multiple muscle force combinations can be used at each HTA angle to generate elbow flexion. Trials showed that the testing apparatus produced highly repeatable joint motion at each HTA angle and with varying muscle force combinations. The intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.95 for all conditions. Conclusions: Repeatable smooth cadaveric elbow motion was created that mimicked the in vivo situation. Clinical relevance: These results suggest that the dynamic elbow testing apparatus can be used to characterize elbow biomechanics in cadaver upper extremities.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the effect of flexion on valgus carrying angle in the human elbow using a dynamic elbow testing apparatus. METHODS: Active elbow motion was simulated in seven cadaveric upper extremities. Six electromechanical actuators simulated muscle action, while 6 degrees-of-freedom joint motion was measured with an optical tracking system to quantify the kinematics of the ulna with respect to the humerus as the elbow was flexed at the side position. Repeatability of the testing apparatus was assessed in a single elbow over five flexion-extension cycles. The varus angle change of each elbow was compared at different flexion angles with the arm at 0° of humerothoracic abduction or dependent arm position. RESULTS: The testing apparatus achieved excellent kinematic repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient, >0.95) throughout flexion and extension. All elbows decreased their valgus carrying angle during flexion from 0° to 90° when the arm was maintained at 0° of humerothoracic abduction. Elbows underwent significant total varus angle change from full extension of 3.9° ± 3.4° (P = .007), 7.3° ± 5.2° (P = .01), and 8.9° ± 7.1° (P = .02) at 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion, respectively. No significant varus angle change was observed between 0° and 30° of flexion (P = .66), 60° and 120° of flexion (P = .06), and 90° and 120° of flexion (P = .19). CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic elbow testing apparatus characterized a decrease of valgus carrying angle during elbow flexion and found that most varus angle changes occurred between 30° and 90° of flexion. All specimens underwent varus angle change until at least 90° of flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our model establishes the anatomic decrease in valgus angle by flexion angle in vitro and can serve as a baseline for testing motion profiles of arthroplasty designs and ligamentous reconstruction in the dependent arm position. Future investigations should focus on characterizing motion profile change as the arm is abducted away from the body.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the structural properties of the cadaver bone-screw interface for cementless intramedullary screw fixation in the context of total elbow arthroplasty. METHODS: The intramedullary canals of seven humerus and seven ulna specimens from fresh-frozen cadavers were drilled using custom drill bits until the inner cortex was reached and then hand tapped for the corresponding thread size. Titanium screws were advanced into the tapped holes until securely seated. The bones were potted and then mounted on a uniaxial material testing machine. A tensile load was applied, and end-of-test elongation, failure load, energy absorbed, and stiffness were determined. End-of-test load and elongation were defined as the elongation and load experienced by the structure at 3,000 N or failure. Each specimen was inspected for evidence of pullout, loosening, or visible fractures. RESULTS: The end-of-test load and elongation for the humerus specimens were 2721 ± 738 N and 3.0 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. The ulna specimens reached 92% of the humerus specimens' end-of-test load at 2,514 ± 678 N and 120% of their end-of-test elongation (3.6 ± 0.6 mm). The stiffness of the humerus specimens was 1,077 ± 336 N/mm, which was 1.3 times greater than the stiffness of the ulna specimens (790 ± 211 N/mm). Lastly, the energy absorbed by the humerus samples was 3.6 ± 1.6 J, which was 92% of the energy absorbed by the ulna samples at 3.9 ± 1.1 J. One humerus and three ulnas failed before the end-of-test load of 3,000 N. Two failures were caused by screw pullout and two by bone fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that intramedullary screw fixation is successful in withstanding forces that are greater than required for osseointegration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Uncemented fixation may be beneficial in elbow arthroplasty.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review to identify and summarize the various techniques that have been used to simulate the pivot-shift test in vitro. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were screened for studies involving the simulated pivot-shift test in human cadaveric knees published between 1946 and May 2014. Study parameters including sample size, study location, simulated pivot-shift technique, loads applied, knee flexion angles at which simulated pivot shift was tested, and kinematic evaluation tools were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies reporting simulated pivot-shift testing on 627 cadaveric knees fulfilled the criteria. Reviewer inter-rater agreement for study selection showed a κ score of 0.960 (full-text review). Twenty-seven studies described the use of internal rotation torque, with a mean of 5.3 Nm (range, 1 to 18 Nm). Forty-seven studies described the use of valgus torque, with a mean of 8.8 Nm (range, 1 to 25 Nm). Four studies described the use of iliotibial tract tension, ranging from 10 to 88 N. Regarding static simulated pivot-shift test techniques, 100% of the studies performed testing at 30° of knee flexion, and the most tested range of motion in the continuous tests was 0° to 90°. Anterior tibial translation was the most analyzed parameter during the simulated pivot-shift test, being used in 45 studies. In 22% of the studies, a robotic system was used to simulate the pivot-shift test. Robotic systems were shown to have better control of the loading system and higher tracking system accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a reference for investigators who desire to apply simulated pivot shift in their in vitro studies. It is recommended to simulate the pivot-shift test using a 10-Nm valgus torque and 5-Nm internal rotation torque. Knee flexion of 30° is mandatory for testing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of basic science studies.