RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The US military's recent involvement in long standing conflict has caused the pioneering of many lifesaving medical advances, often made possible by data-driven research. However, future advances in battlefield medicine will likely require greater data fidelity than is currently attainable. Continuing to improve survival rates will require data which establishes the relative contributions to preventable mortality and guides future interventions. Prehospital data, particularly that from Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Cards and TCCC After Action Reports (TCCC AARs), are notoriously inconsistent in reaching searchable databases for formal evaluation. While the military has begun incorporating more modern technology in advanced data capture over the past few years like the Air Force's Battlefield Assisted Trauma Distributed Observation Kit (BATDOK) and the Army's Medical Hands-free Unified Broadcast system (MEDHUB), more analysis weighing the advantages and disadvantages of substituting analog solutions is needed. DISCUSSION: We propose 3 changes which may aid prehospital data capture and facilitate analysis: reexamine the current format of TCCC Cards and consider reducing the number of available datapoints to streamline completion, implement a military-wide mandate for all Role 1 providers to complete a TCCC AAR within 24 hours of a casualty event, and formalize the process of requesting de-identified data from the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System (AFMES) database. CONCLUSION: Reflecting on the state of US military medicine after 20 years of war, an important focus is improving the way prehospital data is gathered and analyzed by the military. There are steps we can take now to enhance our capabilities.
Assuntos
Cardiologia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Medicina Militar , Respiração Artificial , Gerenciamento de DadosRESUMO
Large-scale combat and multi-domain operations will pose unprecedented challenges to the military healthcare system. This scoping review examines the specific challenges related to the management of airway compromise, the second leading cause of potentially preventable death on the battlefield. Closing existing capability gaps will require a comprehensive approach across all components of the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System. In this, we present the case for a change in doctrine to selectively provide definitive airway management in prehospital settings to maximize the effectiveness of limited resources. Organizational changes to optimize training and efficiency in delivery of complex airway intervention include centralization of assigned healthcare personnel. Training must vastly increase opportunities for live tissue and patient experiences to obtain repetitions of both non-invasive and definitive airway procedures. Potential materiel solutions include extra-glottic devices, bag-valve masks, video laryngoscopes, and oxygen generators all ruggedized and capable of operations in austere settings. Leadership and education changes must formalize more robust airway skills into the initial training curricula for more healthcare personnel who will potentially need to perform these life-saving interventions. Simultaneously, personnel changes should expand authorizations for clinicians with advanced airway skills to the lowest echelons of care. Finally, existing medical training and treatment facilities must expand as necessary to accommodate the training and skill maintenance of these personnel.