RESUMO
After liver transplantation (LTx), the most common cause of death in the long-term is de-novo malignancy (DNM). The aim is to review the gender differences in the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of DNM within the same geographical locations. METHODS: Four studies were identified comparing post-LTx SIR between males and females. RESULTS: From 6663 males and 2780 females LTx recipients, the mean SIR from each of the four studies for males is 2.8, 2.0, 1.94, and 3.4, and 3.5, 1.3, 1.95, and 2.3 for females. On meta-analysis using a random effect model for each gender group. No significant difference was revealed after logarithmic transformation and subgroup meta-analysis. Overall mean SIR with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for males is 2.53 (95% CI 1.65-3.88) and 2.3 (1.25-4.24) for females. lung malignancy, 1.97 (1.14-3.41) for males and 2.65 (0.67-10.47) for females. For colorectal malignancy, the combined SIR for males is 1.98 (0.58-6.78) and 1.85 (1.02-3.37) for females. The SIR for female gender-specific malignancies; SIR for breast is 1.1 ± 4.4, cervix 2.9 ± 1.9, uterus 2.8, and ovarian 0.7, and for males, testis 1.6 ± 1.3, prostate 1.2 ± 0.4. However, rare malignancies, male breast cancers (n = 1, SIR, 22.6), and Kaposi's sarcoma, in males (n = 6) and in females (n = 1), had SIR 120. and 212.7, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, there are no statistical differences between male and female DNM. Female-specific cervix, uterus, ovarian, and male-specific testis and prostate have similar SIR. Rare malignancies have very high SIR.
Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing lower extremity bypasses (LEB) are at a high risk of developing post-discharge complications requiring readmission. Health systems have developed several strategies to mitigate this risk. One such measure is developing comprehensive Transitional Care Program (TCP), which includes phone calls to patients after being discharged from the hospital. Our study aimed to assess short-term readmission, mortality, and amputation rates of patients who participated in TCP by completing at least one post-discharge follow-up phone call after undergoing LEB for revascularization of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: A retrospective review was completed for patients who underwent LEB surgery between January 2010 and January 2020 to treat PAD at Penn State Hershey Medical Center. Immediate discharge follow-up was done via telephone calls using a standardized script. Patients were then divided into two groups, those who did not have a successful follow-up call (Group I) and those who had at least one successful follow-up call within seven days after discharge (Group II). Univariate analysis was used to compare preoperative demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes. The probability of readmission and risk factors contributing to it were computed using multiple stepwise forward regression analyses. Epidemiological analysis was done to evaluate the risk of readmission in the group receiving post-discharge follow-up calls. RESULTS: A total of 457 patients underwent LEB from 2010 to 2020 and qualified for inclusion in the study. Among these patients, 126 (27.6%) did not have a successful post-discharge follow-up call (Group I), whereas, 331 (72.4%) patients did complete a successful call (Group II). The mean age of patients was 66.7 years. There were no significant differences in preoperative baseline patient characteristics or intraoperative factors. Patients who completed a successful call had lower readmission rates within thirty days of the operation (8.8 vs. 17.5%, P = 0.008), and this was sustained in multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio AOR: 0.18, [confidence interval CI: 0.05-0.66], P = 0.009). However, no differences were observed for thirty-day mortality (Group-I: 3.2% versus Group-II: 1.2%, P = 0.152) or amputation (Group-I: 9.6% versus Group II 5.9%, P = 0.162). Among those who had a successful call, patients with a history of smoking (AOR: 4.05 [CI: 1.21, 17.12] P = 0.025), diabetes mellitus (AOR: 3.42 [CI: 1.35, 8.7] P = 0.01) and myocardial infarction (AOR: 7.15 [CI: 1.76, 20.1] P = 0.006) had a much higher chances of readmission. Risk analysis using epidemiological methods showed that by receiving a call, the risk of readmission could be dropped to half (RR: 0.50 [CI: 0.30, 0.84]), with an attributable risk reduction of -8.7% (CI: -15.9%, -1.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This single-institution retrospective study demonstrates the importance of immediate discharge follow-up phone calls in patients who undergo open lower extremity revascularization to reduce thirty-day readmissions. Our analysis showed patients who received immediate follow-up phone calls were less likely to be readmitted to the hospital. The development of reliable and efficient systems to enhance immediate discharge follow-up in vascular surgery patients is pivotal to improving quality of care, preventing readmissions, and reducing healthcare costs.