RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although impairment in the quality of life is common among cocaine dependent patients, there are but a few researches about the interaction between addiction and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To study different parameters of quality of life in a sample of cocaine dependent patients and to compare patients with or without dual diagnosis. Also, to promote the importance of subjectivity in the quality of life and to propose to incorporate patients' self-perception into their treatment. METHOD: Three diagnostic interviews were administered (SCID-I, SCID-II and PRISM) and a quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) was applied between two different patient groups: Group I (cocaine dependent patients) and Group II (cocaine dependent patients with other mental disorder). RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with dual disorders (Group II) showed broader differences in perceptions of their quality of life in comparison with their clinicians. The perception of quality of life may vary depending on the presence and severity of mental disorders, and these different appreciations may explain the difficulties that clinicians face in understanding their patients' expectations and motivations. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A systematic evaluation of the subjective quality of life should be included in the management of cocaine dependent patients in order to more accurately understand the patients' perception of their treatment, motivations and expectations.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La calidad de vida de los pacientes dependientes a la cocaína se encuentra alterada y hay poca información acerca de cómo interactúa la dependencia a sustancias y la calidad de vida. OBJETIVO: Estudiar los diferentes parámetros de calidad de vida en pacientes dependientes a la cocaína con o sin diagnóstico de patología dual. Asimismo, señalar la importancia de la subjetividad en la calidad de vida y proponer la incorporación de la autopercepción de los pacientes en su tratamiento. MÉTODO: Se realizaron tres entrevistas diagnósticas (SCID-I, SCID-II y PRISM) y un cuestionario de calidad de vida (SF-36) entre dos grupos diferentes de pacientes: Grupo I (pacientes con dependencia a la cocaína solamente) y Grupo II (pacientes dependiente a la cocaína con otro trastorno mental). RESULTADOS: Los pacientes diagnosticados con patología dual (Grupo II) mostraban amplias diferencias en la percepción de la calidad de vida comparada con la percepción de sus terapeutas. La percepción de la calidad de vida podría variar dependiendo de la presencia y gravedad de los trastornos mentales asociados. Además, estas diferentes apreciaciones podrían explicar las dificultades que tiene el clínico para entender las expectativas y motivaciones del paciente de cara a su tratamiento. DISCUSIÓN Y CONCLUSIÓN: En pacientes dependientes a la cocaína debería realizarse de forma sistemática una evaluación de la calidad de vida subjetiva con el fin de conocer con mayor precisión la percepción que tienen los pacientes de su tratamiento, así como sus motivaciones y expectativas.
RESUMO
AIM: to analyze the Quality of Life Concept, is which currently used in drug addiction. We reviewed the studies published until April 2010, using two international databases: PubMed (key words: quality of life, addiction, drug dependence and dual diagnosis) and the Web of Knowledge (search by author). We identified 479 papers on quality of life and drugs abuse, of which were on: quality of life and addictions (433) and quality of life and dual pathology (37). RESULTS: the quality of life concept has evolved, from the forties decade till the present time, remains controversial and still subject to change. Most authors accept the multidimensionality of the quality of life concept, that includes the physical/biological, psychological and social dimension. Currently the patient's satisfaction concept is emerging. On the other hand, it is known that there are discrepancies in the patient's and therapist's view on the patient's quality of life, especially in dually diagnosed patients. CONCLUSIONS: The conceptual study of the quality of life is important. Quality of life components, as the perception of the disease, have been associated with treatment adherence and the disease's progress. For the previous reasons we believe. Quality of Life should be included in the regular evaluation.