RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of different protective barriers as a function of the photoactivation distances on the radiant exposure of several light-curing units (LCU). The influence of the protective barriers on the degree of conversion of an adhesive resin was also evaluated. METHODS: Five LCUs were evaluated: Valo Cordless-used in standard mode (Ultradent, South Jordan, USA); Radii-cal-used in continuous mode (SDI, Bayswater, AU); Emitter D-used in continuous mode (Schuster, Santa Maria, BR); Bluephase N-used in high-intensity mode (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, LI); and Rainbow Curing Light-used in continuous mode (Axdent, Guangdong, CN). For each LCU, radiant exposure was measured with a spectrometer (MARC Resin Calibrator) using three different protective barriers (low-density polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, or Radii-cal barrier sleeves) and five photoactivation distances (0, 2, 5, 10, and 20 mm). The degree of conversion of an adhesive resin (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA) was measured through Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The translucency parameter of protective barriers was measured with a spectrophotometer. For all statistical tests, a significance level of α = 0.05 was set. RESULTS: For all LCUs tested, radiant exposure was found to be significantly influenced by both protective barriers and curing distance (p≤0.001). In general terms, all the protective barriers significantly decreased the radiant exposure. Radii-cal barrier sleeves were the protective barrier that most decreased the radiant exposure. Irrespective of the protective barrier used, none of the LCU equipment reached the required minimum radiant exposure of 16 J/cm2 at 10 mm of curing distance. The degree of conversion was not effected by either LCU or a protective barrier (p≥0.211). CONCLUSIONS: Protective barriers and photoactivation distance reduced the radiant exposure emitted by different LCUs.
Assuntos
Lâmpadas de Polimerização Dentária , Cura Luminosa de Adesivos Dentários , Resinas Compostas/uso terapêutico , Teste de Materiais , Polietileno , Cloreto de Polivinila , Espectroscopia de Infravermelho com Transformada de FourierRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the physical and biological properties of different types of flowable resin composites and their bonding ability to dentin, comparing the performance of self-adhesive and bulk-fill materials with a conventional control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four flowable resin composites were tested: two self-adhesive (Y-flow [SA_YF]; and Dyad Flow [SA_DF]); one bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow [BF]); and one conventional composite (Opallis Flow [OF]). The microshear bond strength (µSBS) to dentin (bovine samples) was investigated at 24 hours and 6 months of storage. The materials were also characterized by degree of conversion, cross-link density, water contact angle, color stability, and cell viability (ISO 10993-5/2009) analyses. Data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance and Tukey tests (α=0.05). RESULTS: The µSBS values were higher for control specimens at 24 hours, whereas the resin-dentin bonds were similarly distributed among the groups after aging. Adhesive failure was the most frequent pattern observed at both time intervals. SA_YF was the only material that increased the bond strength over time. Degree of conversion increased in the following order: SA_YF (28.6±1.4%) < BF (49.7±0.8%) < OF (60.0±2.0%) = SA_DF (63.6±2.3%). Cross-link density was similar among all materials. The self-adhesive composites were more hydrophilic than the other types, with BF showing the lowest water contact angle and the greatest color alteration. All resin composites had a biocompatible behavior. CONCLUSION: Chemical composition appeared to be an influential factor affecting the physico-mechanical and biological behavior of the materials tested.