RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the glycemic level patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with and without Metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODOLOGY: cross sectional study. Included patients randomly DM2 corroborated in your clinical record. The SM was identified in patients with at least 3 of 5 criteria of ATP III (Adult Treatment Panel III). A questionnaire was structured. Hemoglobin was determined (HbA1c), HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension (HBP), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and hip (NCC). RESULTS: 283 patients were included. Mean age was 59.8 ± 10.6. The predominant sex was female (73.6%). SM Criteria were : low HDL: 62.9%; hypertriglyceridemia: 56.3%; obesity abdominal (OA) 90.1%, hypertension (HBP): 62.5%. The prevalence of MS was 86.6% (95% CI 83% to 89%). There was significant difference in mean HbA1c level in patients with and without MS, HAS, OR, and low HDL. In contrast, subjects with hypertriglyceridemia had an HbA1c level significantly higher than those without hypertriglyceridemia (8.9% 2.3 vs 8.5% 2.1, respectively, P = 0.01). HbA1c is positively correlated with triglycerides (r = 0.24, p = 0.001), and negatively with weight (r = -0.19, p = 0.001), BMI (r = -0172, p = 0.004), CCI (r = -0.12, P = 0.004) and CCA (r = -0.14, p = 0.02). In adjusted multivariate analysis, only the duration of diabetes was associated with glycemic level (OR = 1.014, 95% in 1.010 to 1.016). CONCLUSIONS: We not found differences significant glycemic level in patients with and without MS.
Objetivo: Comparar el nivel glucémico en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 (DM2) con y sin síndrome metabólico (SM). Metodología: Estudio transversal analítico. Se incluyeron aleatoriamente pacientes con DM2 corroborado en su expediente clínico. El SM se identificó en pacientes con al menos 3 de 5 criterios del ATP III (AdultTreatment Panel III). Se aplicó un cuestionario estructurado. Se determinó hemoglobina glucosilada (HbA1c), colesterol-HDL, triglicéridos, hipertensión arterial sistémica (HAS), índice de masa corporal (IMC), circunferencia de cintura (CCi) y cadera (CCa). Plan de análisis: prevalencia, prueba t de Student, correlación de Pearson y regresión logística. Resultados: Se incluyeron 283 pacientes. Edad promedio: 59.8±10.6 años. Predominó el sexo femenino (73.6%)Criterios cubiertos para SM: hipocolesterolemia-HDL: 62.9%; hipertrigliceridemia: 56.3%; obesidad abdominal (OA) 90.1%; hipertensión arterial sistémica (HAS): 62.5%. La prevalencia de SM fue 86.6% (IC95% 83% a 89%). No hubo diferencia significativa en el promedio de HbA1c en pacientes con y sin SM, HAS, OA, e hipocolesterolemia-HDL. En cambio, sujetos con hipertrigliceridemia tuvieron un promedio significativamente mayor de HbA1c que aquellos sin hipertrigliceridemia (8.9±2.3 vs 8.5±2.1, respectivamente; p=0.01). HbA1c correlacionó positivamente con trigliceridemia (r=0.24, p=0.001), y negativamente con el peso (r= -0.19, p=0.001), IMC (r= -0.172, p=0.004), CCi (r= -0.12, p=0.004) y CCa (r=-0.14, p=0.02). En el análisis multivariado ajustado, solamente la duración de la diabetes se asoció con el nivel glucémico (OR= 1.014, IC95% 1.010 a 1.016). Conclusiones: No encontramos diferencias significativas en el nivel glucémico en pacientes con y sin SM.
Assuntos
Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Síndrome Metabólica/sangue , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/complicações , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores Sexuais , Circunferência da Cintura/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the glycemic level patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with and without Metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODOLOGY: cross sectional study. Included patients randomly DM2 corroborated in your clinical record. The SM was identified in patients with at least 3 of 5 criteria of ATP III (Adult Treatment Panel III). A questionnaire was structured. Hemoglobin was determined (HbA1c), HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension (HBP), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and hip (NCC). RESULTS: 283 patients were included. Mean age was 59.8 ± 10.6. The predominant sex was female (73.6
). SM Criteria were : low HDL: 62.9
; hypertriglyceridemia: 56.3
; obesity abdominal (OA) 90.1
, hypertension (HBP): 62.5
. The prevalence of MS was 86.6
(95
CI 83
to 89
). There was significant difference in mean HbA1c level in patients with and without MS, HAS, OR, and low HDL. In contrast, subjects with hypertriglyceridemia had an HbA1c level significantly higher than those without hypertriglyceridemia (8.9
2.3 vs 8.5
2.1, respectively, P = 0.01). HbA1c is positively correlated with triglycerides (r = 0.24, p = 0.001), and negatively with weight (r = -0.19, p = 0.001), BMI (r = -0172, p = 0.004), CCI (r = -0.12, P = 0.004) and CCA (r = -0.14, p = 0.02). In adjusted multivariate analysis, only the duration of diabetes was associated with glycemic level (OR = 1.014, 95
in 1.010 to 1.016). CONCLUSIONS: We not found differences significant glycemic level in patients with and without MS.
Assuntos
Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Síndrome Metabólica/sangue , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/complicações , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores Sexuais , Circunferência da Cintura/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the glycemic level patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with and without Metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODOLOGY: cross sectional study. Included patients randomly DM2 corroborated in your clinical record. The SM was identified in patients with at least 3 of 5 criteria of ATP III (Adult Treatment Panel III). A questionnaire was structured. Hemoglobin was determined (HbA1c), HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension (HBP), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and hip (NCC). RESULTS: 283 patients were included. Mean age was 59.8 ± 10.6. The predominant sex was female (73.6
. The prevalence of MS was 86.6
). There was significant difference in mean HbA1c level in patients with and without MS, HAS, OR, and low HDL. In contrast, subjects with hypertriglyceridemia had an HbA1c level significantly higher than those without hypertriglyceridemia (8.9
2.1, respectively, P = 0.01). HbA1c is positively correlated with triglycerides (r = 0.24, p = 0.001), and negatively with weight (r = -0.19, p = 0.001), BMI (r = -0172, p = 0.004), CCI (r = -0.12, P = 0.004) and CCA (r = -0.14, p = 0.02). In adjusted multivariate analysis, only the duration of diabetes was associated with glycemic level (OR = 1.014, 95
in 1.010 to 1.016). CONCLUSIONS: We not found differences significant glycemic level in patients with and without MS.
Assuntos
/sangue , Glicemia/análise , Síndrome Metabólica/sangue , Análise de Variância , Circunferência da Cintura/fisiologia , /complicações , Estudos Transversais , Fatores Sexuais , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Masculino , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Síndrome Metabólica/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Compare the effectiveness and safety of mebendazole versus nitazoxanide in the treatment of Giardia lamblia in children. Giardiasis is an intestinal protozoan of worldwide distribution which most frequently affects the infantile population. In Mexico we have, found a frequency of three to sixty percent. We have, used different medications in it's treatment, but the experience with mebendazole and nitazoxanide is scarce. METHOD: An experimental study as a clinical assay. We included children from the ages of 4 to 12 years old, which had a positive Giardia lamblia cysts in their feces. The children were divided into to two groups: A, were a administered 100 mg of mebendazole every 12 hours, for three days; B, were administered 100 mg of nitazoxanide every 12 hours, for three days; A feces control study was performed at three, five and seven days post treatment. At the end of the treatment we asked the parents if the children had presented any adverse events during the administration of the medication. For the statistical analysis we used Student's t and Chi squared. RESULTS: We studied 82 children, 41 (50%) for each group. In group A, the control feces studies were negative 33 resulting in a 80.4% effectiveness; in group B, 32 were negative resulting in a 78.0% effectiveness, without being statistically significant with a p = 0.8. We found adverse, events in 9 (22%) of the children in group A and 16 (39%) in group B, there was, statistically significant difference with p = 0.09. However, we discovered that the children who received nitazoxanide suffered from abdominal pain more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that both mebendazole and nitazoxanide are efficient for use against infection due to Giardia lamblia, however, the secondary reactions with nitazoxanide were more frequent than with mebendazol.