RESUMO
The present narrative review is aimed to rekindle discussion regarding whether and how uterine leiomyoma and pregnancy may impact each other. Although fibroids are hormone-dependent lesions, their growth during pregnancy seems to have a nonlinear trend. Besides placental estrogens and progesterone, an array of endocrine and paracrine factors affect fibroid blood supply, growth rate, and risk of degeneration along the gestational and puerperal periods. According to current evidence, the presence of leiomyomas might increase the risk of some adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although a causative relation between fibroids and spontaneous abortion is questionable, the presence of multiple submucosal lesions in certain populations, such as infertile women, may increase the risk of pregnancy loss. Slightly increased risks of placenta previa, placental abruption and fetal malpresentation may occur, mainly due to the mechanical influence of multiple and large fibroids. Cesarean section and preterm birth rates are also probably increased in the presence of fibroids. The risk associations are based on meta-analyses of cohort studies (level of evidence 2a), retrospective cohort studies (2b), case-control (3a), and cross-sectional studies (3b), but with a predominantly low risk of bias. For evaluating the growth pattern of leiomyomas and their real influence on obstetric outcomes, future studies should enroll women with fibroids diagnosed prior to pregnancy and follow them prospectively throughout the gestation and puerperium.
Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo , Infertilidade Feminina , Leiomioma , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Neoplasias Uterinas , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Leiomioma/patologia , Placenta/patologia , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite intense research, it remains intriguing why hormonal therapies in general and progestins in particular sometimes fail in endometriosis. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: We review here the action mechanisms of progesterone receptor ligands in endometriosis, identify critical differences between the effects of progestins on normal endometrium and endometriosis and envisage pathways to escape drug resistance and improve the therapeutic response of endometriotic lesions to such treatments. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a systematic Pubmed search covering articles published since 1958 about the use of progestins, estro-progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulators, to treat endometriosis and its related symptoms. Two reviewers screened the titles and abstracts to select articles for full-text assessment. OUTCOMES: Progesterone receptor signalling leads to down-regulation of estrogen receptors and restrains local estradiol production through interference with aromatase and 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1. Progestins inhibit cell proliferation, inflammation, neovascularisation and neurogenesis in endometriosis. However, progesterone receptor expression is reduced and disrupted in endometriotic lesions, with predominance of the less active isoform (PRA) over the full-length, active isoform (PRB), due to epigenetic abnormalities affecting the PGR gene transcription. Oxidative stress is another mechanism involved in progesterone resistance in endometriosis. Among the molecular targets of progesterone in the normal endometrium that resist progestin action in endometriotic cells are the nuclear transcription factor FOXO1, matrix metalloproteinases, the transmembrane gap junction protein connexin 43 and paracrine regulators of estradiol metabolism. Compared to other phenotypes, deep endometriosis appears to be more resistant to size regression upon medical treatments. Individual genetic characteristics can affect the bioavailability and pharmacodynamics of hormonal drugs used to treat endometriosis and, hence, explain part of the variability in the therapeutic response. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Medical treatment of endometriosis needs urgent innovation, which should start by deeper understanding of the disease core features and diverse phenotypes and idiosyncrasies, while moving from pure hormonal treatments to drug combinations or novel molecules capable of restoring the various homeostatic mechanisms disrupted by endometriotic lesions.
Assuntos
Endometriose/tratamento farmacológico , Ligantes , Doenças Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Progesterona/agonistas , Endometriose/epidemiologia , Endometriose/metabolismo , Endométrio/anormalidades , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Doenças Peritoneais/epidemiologia , Doenças Peritoneais/metabolismo , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Uterinas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Clinical studies clearly indicate that endometriosis is a condition associated with high levels of chronic stress. The stress intensity correlates with pain severity and disease extension. However, it is unknown whether chronic stress represents a primary cause of endometriosis and, therefore, if avoiding or treating chronic stress may reduce the risk of developing endometriosis. Repeated, uncontrolled stress either before or after experimental endometriosis induction promotes disease mechanisms and accelerates lesion growth in rodents. Furthermore, patients with endometriosis have a heightened risk of other inflammatory and immune-related diseases, many of which have also been associated with stress. Here, we review the latest evidences regarding the relationship between chronic stress and endometriosis and discuss the potential bidirectional aspect of such association. Further research may clarify if endometriosis is a cause and/or a consequence of stress and whether stress-reducing therapies are effective to mitigate symptoms and slow down the development of endometriotic lesions.
Assuntos
Endometriose/complicações , Estresse Psicológico/complicações , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
Endometriosis is a benign gynecological disorder which presents significant challenges in terms of diagnosis and management. Despite decades of research, there are no sufficiently sensitive and specific signs and symptoms nor blood tests for the clinical confirmation of endometriosis, which hampers prompt diagnosis and treatment. The huge majority of potential biomarkers has been discarded in research stage and very few have been translated to clinical practice. Serum CA-125 is the most studied and used one, but studies have shown its poor diagnostic performance. Several factors involved in the chronic inflammatory process of endometriosis, such as hormones, cytokines, chemokines, angiogenic factors, oxidative stress markers and others, have been implicated in the disease's pathogenesis and have been extensively studied, but not a single one has successfully been able to accurately identify the disease. MicroRNAs have emerged more recently but their utility to detect endometriosis remains uncertain. The search for a biomarker or a set of biomarkers is still open and may benefit from novel molecular biology and bioinformatics approaches to mine and uncover molecular signatures specifically associated with the disease.