RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Variations in healthcare provision around the world may impact how patients with functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGIDs) are investigated, diagnosed, and treated. However, these differences have not been reviewed. PURPOSES: The Multinational Working Team of the Rome Foundation, established to make recommendations on the conduct of multinational, cross-cultural research in FGIDs, identified seven key issues that are analyzed herein: (i) coverage afforded by different healthcare systems/providers; (ii) level of the healthcare system where patients with FGIDs are treated; (iii) extent/types of diagnostic procedures typically undertaken to diagnose FGIDs; (iv) physicians' familiarity with and implementation of the Rome diagnostic criteria in clinical practice; (v) range of medications approved for FGIDs and approval process for new agents; (vi) costs involved in treating FGIDs; and (vii) prevalence and role of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) for FGIDs. Because it was not feasible to survey all countries around the world, we compared a selected number of countries based on their geographical and ethno-cultural diversity. Thus, we included Italy and South Korea as representative of nations with broad-based coverage of healthcare in the population and India and Mexico as newly industrialized countries where there may be limited provision of healthcare for substantial segments of the population. In light of the paucity of formal publications on these issues, we included additional sources from the medical literature as well as perspectives provided by local experts and the media. Finally, we provide future directions on healthcare issues that should be taken into account and implemented when conducting cross-cultural and multinational research in FGIDs.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/etnologia , Gastroenteropatias/economia , Gastroenteropatias/etnologia , Humanos , Índia , Itália , México , República da CoreiaRESUMO
Total gastrointestinal transit time (TGITT), frequency of defecation, and anorectal manometry were evaluated in 63 pediatric patients referred for chronic nonorganic constipation; in 39, segmental transit times of the right and left colon and rectum were also measured. TGITT was significantly longer in chronically constipated children than in matched normal controls. Although bowel frequency was highly significantly correlated with TGITT in patients with prolonged transit time, not all children with prolonged TGITT had reduced bowel frequency. Moreover, not all children with constipation had prolonged TGITT. In children with idiopathic chronic constipation, slowing of intestinal transit occurred most frequently at the level of the distal colon and rectum. Anorectal motility variables were not significantly different in children with functional chronic constipation and in normal children. Maximal resting and pressure and mean intrarectal distending volume causing threshold inhibition in constipated patients did not significantly differ from the control values. Therefore, anorectal manometry did not detect relevant motor abnormalities in constipated children.