RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) provide evidence-based recommendations to healthcare professionals, policy makers, patients and other stakeholders. Mexico is the biggest producer of CPGs in Latin America and Caribbean countries. The National Healthcare Technology Excellence Center (acronym in Spanish: CENETEC) is responsible for the CPG development, adaptation and update. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence to the GRADE framework and to critically appraise the Mexican CPGs with the AGREE-II tool. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study with a random sample of 86 CPGs produced by CENETEC between 2015 and 2017 and published in an online database called "Catalogo Maestro". We assessed the adherence to the GRADE framework and performed a critical appraisal with the AGREE II tool. RESULTS: Of the 86 CPGs, 34 were published in 2015, 21 in 2016 and 31 in 2017. Of the 86 CPGs, 25 (29%) used the GRADE framework; adherence to GRADE standards was, however, inconsistent and generally poor. The overall methodological quality by AGREE II proved a median of 16.6% (Min 16.6%, Max 50%). CONCLUSION: CPGs produced by CENETEC during this period had a poor adherence to the GRADE framework and low score by AGREE II standards. A concerted initiative could rapidly improve CENETEC guidelines.
Assuntos
Estudos Transversais , Humanos , MéxicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics of electrophysiological subtypes and prognostic factors of Mexican adults diagnosed with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) have not been described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single center, ambispective, cohort study was performed (2015-2019). GBS was defined following the Asbury and Cornblath criteria. Electrodiagnosis was made according to Hadden criteria. Clinical, biochemical and electrodiagnostic parameters were described, compared and analyzed using a multivariate model. Only patients who completed a 3-month follow-up were included. RESULTS: 137 GBS patients (92 males; mean age 46.6 ± 16.6).132 (96.3%) underwent an electrodiagnostic assessment.68 (51.5%) were classified as axonal GBS, with further classified into two groups: acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) 45.4%, and acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) 8,6%. The following characteristics were lower in the AMAN group: Medical Research Counsel sumscore (MRC) 30.1 ± 16.3 vs 36.4 ± 14.4, unilateral facial palsy 10% vs 25.9% and albuminocytologic dissociation 41.3% vs. 71.7%.Multivariate analysis found AMAN as an independent predictor of an unfavorable outcome OR: 3.34 (p = 0.03) CONCLUSIONS: AMAN subtype is the most frequent presentation of GBS in Mexican adult patients and an independent predictor of inability to walk independently at 3 months after discharge.
Assuntos
Eletrodiagnóstico/métodos , Fenômenos Eletrofisiológicos/fisiologia , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/fisiopatologia , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia , Caminhada/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis involves intravenous infusion of regular insulin until recovery of the episode: this is associated with high costs. Coadministration of insulin glargine from the onset of management may prove beneficial, potentially avoiding rebound hyperglycemia, and hopefully improving the time to resolution of the disease. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials comparing coadministration of insulin glargine versus standard treatment in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis. To be eligible, studies must assess the efficacy of insulin glargine and report clinically important outcomes. Two reviewers extracted data, assessed risk of bias and summarized strength of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Four studies (135 participants during hospital follow-up) were included in this review. Low-quality evidence from three trials suggested that subcutaneously administered insulin glargine, in addition to the standard treatment, significantly reduces the time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis (MD -4.19 hours; 95% CI: -7.81 to 0.57; p = 0.02). There was neutral difference between the two groups regarding length of hospital stay and hypoglycemic episodes. CONCLUSIONS: subcutaneously administered insulin glargine, in addition to standard treatment, significantly reduces the time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis, with neutral effects on hypoglycemic episodes.