RESUMO

Chronic inflammatory airway diseases, including asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, eosinophilic COPD and allergic rhinitis are a global health concern. Despite the coexistence of these diseases and their common pathophysiology, they are often managed independently, resulting in poor asthma control, continued symptoms and poor quality of life. Understanding disease pathophysiology is important for best treatment practice, reduced disease burden and improved patient outcomes. The pathophysiology of type 2 inflammation is driven by both the innate immune system triggered by pollutants, viral or fungal infections involving type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) and the adaptive immune system, triggered by contact with an allergen involving type 2 T-helper (Th2) cells. Both ILC2 and Th2 cells produce the type-2 cytokines (interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13), each with several roles in the inflammation cascade. IL-4 and IL-13 cause B-cell class switching and IgE production, release of pro-inflammatory mediators, barrier disruption and tissue remodelling. In addition, IL-13 causes goblet-cell hyperplasia and mucus production. All three interleukins are involved in trafficking eosinophils to tissues, producing clinical symptoms characteristic of chronic inflammatory airway diseases. Asthma is a heterogenous disease; therefore, identification of biomarkers and early targeted treatment is critical for patients inadequately managed by inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß-agonists alone. The Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines recommend add-on biological (anti IgE, IL-5/5R, IL-4R) treatments for those not responding to standard of care. Targeted therapies, including omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab and tezepelumab, were developed on current understanding of the pathophysiology of type 2 inflammation. These therapies offer hope for improved management of type 2 inflammatory airway diseases.

RESUMO

Introducción: Asma y EPOC son enfermedades heterogéneas, algunos pacientes comparten características clínicas de ambas. Existen incertidumbres en los criterios para definir superposición asma-EPOC (ACO) y la prevalencia es entre el 15% y el 25% de la población adulta con obstrucción crónica del flujo aéreo. Motiva este estudio determinar la prevalencia de ACO en Argentina, que es desconocida. Objetivos: Primario: Determinar prevalencia de ACO en el estudio EPOC-AR. Se cundarios: Evaluar y analizar las características clínicas de los pacientes con ACO, la gravedad de los síntomas, la frecuencia y gravedad de exacerbaciones. Describir y comparar el tratamiento entre ACO vs. EPOC puros. Base de datos del estudio EPOC.AR: Espirometrías, asma, atopía o rinitis, síntomas respiratorios: CAT (prueba de evaluación de EPOC) y mMRC (Medical Research Council modificado), frecuencia de exacerbaciones/año previo, comorbilidades y tratamientos. Guías GOLD 2017 para determinar grados de obstrucción espirométrica y Grupos A, B, C y D. Criterios diagnósticos de ACO (comité expertos USA, Europa del Este y Asia-Denver 2015): CRITERIOS MAYORES: 1. Obstrucción persistente (FEV1/FVC pos-BD <70% o LIN) en ≥ 40 años. 2. TBQ ≥ 10 paquetes/año, contaminación ambiental o biomasa. 3. Historia documentada de asma antes de los 40 años o respuesta pos-BD ≥ 400 mL en FEV1. CRITERIOS MENORES: 1. Historia documentada de atopía o rinitis alérgica. 2. Res puesta pos-BD en FEV1 > 200 mL. 3. Recuento de eosinófilos en sangre periférica ≥ 300 células-Ul-1 (no realizado en EPOC.AR). Prueba de Chi-cuadrado, Chi-cuadrado de Pearson, razón de verosimilitud, asociación lineal por lineal. Resultados: EPOC (n498), n95 con criterios de ACO, masculino (53,4%) y edad pro medio 63,6 años. El 1%, sin asma y respuesta BD ≥ 400 mL; el 32,7%, asmáticos (3,6% respuesta BD ≥ 400 mL y el 14,5%, entre 200-400 mL); n23 respuesta BD ≥ 400 mL (4,6%). Prevalen cia ACO: 19,08% (IC 15,6-22,5) y del 2,6% del total de la población de EPOC.AR. En población ACO vs. EPOC, se detectó: menor promedio de edad y de FEV1 pre BD (p < 0,01), mayor respuesta BD (p < 0,05), mayor frecuencia de sibilancias (p < 0,01; IC 2,75-7,64), mayor frecuencia de diagnóstico previo de asma (p < 0,01; IC 3,79-10,05) y el 26,08% tenían antecedentes familiares de asma. Mayor uso de ATB (p < 0,05) e ICS/LABA (p < 0,05; IC 1,1-5,3). Mayor frecuencia de exacerbaciones (12,47%; IC 9,56-15,39) que motivaron indicación de medicación en un 90,48% y 2,49 veces más de alteraciones en actividades diarias y ausentismo laboral. No se registraron diferencias significativas entre pacientes con ACO frente a EPOC puros en frecuencia de grupos A, B, C y D. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de ACO fue del 19,08% en pacientes EPOC del es tudio EPOC.AR; tenían significativamente menor edad, mayor grado de obstrucción, frecuencia de sibilancias, uso de antibióticos/año previo y CI (LABA/CI). Destacamos la importancia de identificar este fenotipo para un tratamiento adecuado por sus impli cancias clínicas, y deterioro en calidad de vida.

Background: Asthma and COPD are heterogeneous diseases, and some patients share clinical features of both conditions. There are uncertainties about the criteria to define asthma-COPD overlap (ACO), and its prevalence is 15-25% in the adult population with chronic airflow obstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of ACO in Argentina, which is unknown. Objectives: Primary: to determine the prevalence of ACO in the EPOC.AR study. Secondary: to evaluate and analyze the clinical features of patients with ACO, the severity of the symptoms, and the frequency and severity of exacerbations. to describe and compare the treatment of ACO with that of pure COPD. Database of the EPOC.AR study: spirometries, asthma, atopy or rhinitis, respiratory symptoms: CAT (COPD Assesment Test) and mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) scale, frequency of exacerbations/previous year, comorbidities and treatments. 2017 GOLD Guides (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) to determine airflow obstruction degrees and Groups A, B, C, and D. ACO diagnostic criteria (expert committee from USA, East Europe and Asia that took place in Denver, 2015): MAJOR CRITERIA: 1. Persistent obstruction (post-BD [bronchodilator] FEV1/FVC (forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity) < 70% or LLN [lower limit of normal] ) in ≥ 40 years. 2. SM (smoking) ≥ 10 packs/year, air pollution or biomass. 3. Documented history of asthma before 40 years or post-BD response ≥ 400 ml in FEV1. MINOR CRITERIA: 1. Documented history of atopy or allergic rhinitis. 2. Post-BD response in FEV1 > 200 ml. 3. Peripheral blood eosinophil count ≥ 300 cells-Ul-1 (not performed in EPOC.AR). Chi-Square Test, Pearson's Chi Square Test, likelihood ratio, linear-by-linear association. Results: COPD (n 498), n 95 with ACO criteria, males (53.4%), mean age 63.6 years. 1% without asthma and BD response ≥ 400 ml; 32.7% asthmatics (3.6% with BD response ≥ 400 ml and 14.5% between 200-400 ml); n 23 with BD response ≥ 400 ml (4.6%). ACO prevalence: 19.08% (CI [Confidence Interval] 15.6-22.5) and 2.6% of the total population of EPOC.AR. In the comparison between the ACO and COPD populations, we detected the following: lower mean age and pre-BD FEV1 (p < 0.01), higher frequency of BD response (p < 0.05), higher frequency of sibilance (p < 0.01; CI 2.75-7.64), higher frequency of previous asthma diagnosis (p < 0.01; CI 3.79-10.05); and 26.08% had family history of asthma. Greater use of ATBs (antibiotics) (p < 0.05) and ICS (inhaled corticosteroids)/ LABA (long-acting beta- adrenergic agonists) (p < 0.05; CI 1.1-5.3). Higher frequency of exacerbations (12.47%; CI 9.56-15.39) that motivated the indication of medication in 90.48% and 2.49 times more alterations in daily activities and absence from work. There weren't any significant differences between patients with ACO and pure COPD regarding frequency of groups A, B, C and D. Conclusions: the prevalence of ACO was 19.08% in the COPD patients of the EPOC. AR study; they were significantly younger, with higher degree of obstruction, frequency of sibilance, use of antibiotics/previous year and inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/IC). We emphasize the importance of identifying this phenotype in order to use a suitable treat ment, given its clinical implications and deterioration in quality of life.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: Asthma and COPD are heterogeneous diseases, and some patients share clinical features of both conditions. There are uncertainties about the criteria to define asthma-COPD overlap (ACO), and its prevalence is 15-25% in the adult population with chronic airflow obstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of ACO in Argentina, which is unknown. Objectives: Primary: to determine the prevalence of ACO in the EPOC.AR study. Secondary: to evaluate and analyze the clinical features of patients with ACO, the severity of the symptoms, and the frequency and severity of exacerbations. to describe and compare the treatment of ACO with that of pure COPD. Database of the EPOC.AR study: spirometries, asthma, atopy or rhinitis, respiratory symptoms: CAT (COPD Assesment Test) and mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) scale, frequency of exacerbations/previous year, comorbidities and treatments. 2017 GOLD Guides (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) to determine airflow obstruction degrees and Groups A, B, C, and D. ACO diagnostic criteria (expert committee from USA, East Europe and Asia that took place in Denver, 2015): MAJOR CRITERIA: 1. Persistent obstruction (post-BD [bronchodilator] FEV1/FVC (forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity) < 70% or LLN [lower limit of normal] ) in ≥ 40 years. 2. SM (smoking) ≥ 10 packs/year, air pollution or biomass. 3. Documented history of asthma before 40 years or post-BD response ≥ 400 ml in FEV1. MINOR CRITERIA: 1. Documented history of atopy or allergic rhinitis. 2. Post-BD response in FEV1 > 200 ml. 3. Peripheral blood eosinophil count ≥ 300 cells-Ul-1 (not performed in EPOC.AR). Chi-Square Test, Pearson's Chi Square Test, likelihood ratio, linear-by-linear association. Results: COPD (n 498), n 95 with ACO criteria, males (53.4%), mean age 63.6 years. 1% without asthma and BD response ≥ 400 ml; 32.7% asthmatics (3.6% with BD response ≥ 400 ml and 14.5% between 200-400 ml); n 23 with BD response ≥ 400 ml (4.6%). ACO prevalence: 19.08% (CI [Confidence Interval] 15.6-22.5) and 2.6% of the total population of EPOC.AR. In the comparison between the ACO and COPD populations, we detected the following: lower mean age and pre-BD FEV1 (p < 0.01), higher frequency of BD response (p < 0.05), higher frequency of sibilance (p < 0.01; CI 2.75-7.64), higher frequency of previous asthma diagnosis (p < 0.01; CI 3.79-10.05); and 26.08% had family history of asthma. Greater use of ATBs (antibiotics) (p < 0.05) and ICS (inhaled corticosteroids)/ LABA (long-acting beta- adrenergic agonists) (p < 0.05; CI 1.1-5.3). Higher frequency of exacerbations (12.47%; CI 9.56-15.39) that motivated the indication of medication in 90.48% and 2.49 times more alterations in daily activities and absence from work. There weren't any significant differences between patients with ACO and pure COPD regarding frequency of groups A, B, C and D. Conclusions: the prevalence of ACO was 19.08% in the COPD patients of the EPOC. AR study; they were significantly younger, with higher degree of obstruction, frequency of sibilance, use of antibiotics/previous year and inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/IC). We emphasize the importance of identifying this phenotype in order to use a suitable treat ment, given its clinical implications and deterioration in quality of life.

RESUMEN Introducción: Asma y EPOC son enfermedades heterogéneas, algunos pacientes comparten características clínicas de ambas. Existen incertidumbres en los criterios para definir superposición asma-EPOC (ACO) y la prevalencia es entre el 15% y el 25% de la población adulta con obstrucción crónica del flujo aéreo. Motiva este estudio determinar la prevalencia de ACO en Argentina, que es desconocida. Objetivos: Primario: Determinar prevalencia de ACO en el estudio EPOC-AR. Se cundarios: Evaluar y analizar las características clínicas de los pacientes con ACO, la gravedad de los síntomas, la frecuencia y gravedad de exacerbaciones. Describir y comparar el tratamiento entre ACO vs. EPOC puros. Base de datos del estudio EPOC.AR: Espirometrías, asma, atopía o rinitis, síntomas respiratorios: CAT (prueba de evaluación de EPOC) y mMRC (Medical Research Council modificado), frecuencia de exacerbaciones/año previo, comorbilidades y tratamientos. Guías GOLD 2017 para determinar grados de obstrucción espirométrica y Grupos A, B, C y D. Criterios diagnósticos de ACO (comité expertos USA, Europa del Este y Asia-Denver 2015): CRITERIOS MAYORES: 1. Obstrucción persistente (FEV1/FVC pos-BD <70% o LIN) en ≥ 40 años. 2. TBQ ≥ 10 paquetes/año, contaminación ambiental o biomasa. 3. Historia documentada de asma antes de los 40 años o respuesta pos-BD ≥ 400 mL en FEV1. CRITERIOS MENORES: 1. Historia documentada de atopía o rinitis alérgica. 2. Respu esta pos-BD en FEV1 > 200 mL. 3. Recuento de eosinófilos en sangre periférica ≥ 300 células-Ul-1 (no realizado en EPOC.AR). Prueba de Chi-cuadrado, Chi-cuadrado de Pearson, razón de verosimilitud, asociación lineal por lineal. Resultados: EPOC (n498), n95 con criterios de ACO, masculino (53,4%) y edad pro medio 63,6 años. El 1%, sin asma y respuesta BD ≥ 400 mL; el 32,7%, asmáticos (3,6% respuesta BD ≥ 400 mL y el 14,5%, entre 200-400 mL); n23 respuesta BD ≥ 400 mL (4,6%). Prevalen cia ACO: 19,08% (IC 15,6-22,5) y del 2,6% del total de la población de EPOC.AR. En población ACO vs. EPOC, se detectó: menor promedio de edad y de FEV1 pre BD (p < 0,01), mayor respuesta BD (p < 0,05), mayor frecuencia de sibilancias (p < 0,01; IC 2,75-7,64), mayor frecuencia de diagnóstico previo de asma (p < 0,01; IC 3,79-10,05) y el 26,08% tenían antecedentes familiares de asma. Mayor uso de ATB (p < 0,05) e ICS/LABA (p < 0,05; IC 1,1-5,3). Mayor frecuencia de exacerbaciones (12,47%; IC 9,56-15,39) que motivaron indicación de medicación en un 90,48% y 2,49 veces más de alteraciones en actividades diarias y ausentismo laboral. No se registraron diferencias significativas entre pacientes con ACO frente a EPOC puros en frecuencia de grupos A, B, C y D. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de ACO fue del 19,08% en pacientes EPOC del es tudio EPOC.AR; tenían significativamente menor edad, mayor grado de obstrucción, frecuencia de sibilancias, uso de antibióticos/año previo y CI (LABA/CI). Destacamos la importancia de identificar este fenotipo para un tratamiento adecuado por sus impli cancias clínicas, y deterioro en calidad de vida.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been studied in Argentina. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and relevant clinical characteristics of COPD in a representative sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in a population of adults aged ≥ 40 years randomly selected by cluster sampling in 6 urban locations. Subjects answered a structured survey and performed pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry (PBD). COPD was defined as FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 predicted value. The total prevalence was estimated for each cluster with its 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Of 4,599 surveys and 3,999 spirometries, 3,469 were considered of adequate quality (86.8%) for our study. The prevalence of COPD was 14.5% (CI: 13.4-15.7). The distribution of COPD cases according to FEV1 (GOLD 2017) was stage 1: 38% (CI: 34-43); stage 2: 52% (CI: 47-56); stage 3: 10% (CI: 7-13); and stage 4: 1% (CI: 0-2), and according to the refined ABCD (GOLD 2017) assessment: A: 52% (CI: 47-56); B: 43% (CI: 39-48); C: 1% (CI: 0-2); D: 4% (CI: 2-6). The rate of underdiagnosis was 77.4% (CI 73.7-81.1%) and diagnostic error 60.7% (CI 55.1-66.3%). A significant association was found between COPD and age (OR 3.77 in individuals 50-59 years of age and 19.23 in those > 80 years), male gender (OR 1.62; CI 1.31-2), smoking (OR 1.95; CI 1.49-2.54), low socioeconomic status (OR 1.33; CI 1.02-1.73), and previous tuberculosis (OR 3.3; CI 1.43-7.62). CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that more than 2.3 million Argentineans have COPD, with high rates of underdiagnosis and diagnostic error.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El neumonólogo de adultos acostumbra a prescribir vacunas. Este documento hecho por expertos en aspectos de la especialidad que involucran vacunar a pacientes con enfermedades respiratorias, perteneciente a la Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria, resumió la información disponible proponiendo una participación activa en la vacunación contra influenza (VAG), neumococo (VAN), pertusis y zoster. El Ministerio de Salud (MSAL) en Argentina, como el CDC y su comité de consulta sobre inmunización (ACIP) en Estados Unidos, elaboran calendarios y recomendaciones para vacunación. La ACIP recomienda la VAG a mayores de 6 meses sin contraindicaciones; el MSAL a mayores de 65 años y a quienes tengan comorbilidades (incluye enfermedades respiratorias y tabaquismo) o contacto con personas vulnerables. La clásica VAN polisacárida de 23 serotipos es recomendada para adultos con riesgo de enfermedad invasiva, incluyendo a mayores de 65 años, revacunando a los inmunosuprimidos y una única vez a los mayores de 65 que hubieran sido vacunados 5 años antes o más; la ACIP recomienda dar la VAN conjugada de 13 serotipos, más inmunogénica, secuencialmente con la polisacárida de 23, en adultos con factores de riesgo y en mayores de 65 años. Sugerimos usarla en menores de 65 con comorbilidad respiratoria. El neumonólogo debe recordar al menos 2 vacunas más: dar el refuerzo decenal contra difteria y tétanos (DT) en mayores de 18, una vez con vacuna triple acelular (difteria, pertusis y tétanos) protegiendo contra pertusis y reduciendo su transmisión. El herpes zoster produce un rash cutáneo vesicular doloroso. Uno cada 2 mayores de 85 sufrirán al menos un ataque de herpes zoster. La vacuna reduce más del 50% la incidencia y más del 60% la neuralgia post herpética; el ACIP la recomienda en mayores de 60 años. Un gran número de los pacientes con afecciones pulmonares crónicas tienen esa edad.

The pulmonologist uses to prescribe vaccines to adult patients. Experts of the Argentina Association of Respiratory Medicine who are specialists in areas involving vaccination of patients with respiratory diseases prepared this document which summarizes the available information and proposes an active prescription of the infuenza, pneumococcus, pertussis and herpes zoster vaccinations. The Ministry of Health in Argentina as the CDC and its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in the USA, made recommendations on vaccination indications and schedules. The ACIP recommends influenza vaccination to persons older than 6 months of age without any contraindication. The Ministry of Health recommends this vaccination to persons over 65 years of age, to those with morbidities (including respiratory diseases and smoking habit) and to persons in contact with high risk people. The classic 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine is recommended for adults at risk of invasive disease, including persons over 65 years of age. Revaccination is recommended to immunosuppressed patients and persons over 65 years of age at 5-year intervals. The ACIP recommends vaccination with the 13-valent serotypes polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine, which is more immunogenic, sequentially with the 23-valent vaccine in adults with risk factors and over 65 years of age. We suggest this practice in patients under 65 years of age with respiratory morbidities. The pulmonologist must remember at least two other vaccines: a booster vaccination every 10 years of diphtheria and tetanus vaccine to persons over 18 years of age, and once the triple acellular vaccine (diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus) to protect against pertussis and reduce transmission. Herpes zoster (shingles) causes a painful vesicular rash; 50% of persons over 85 years suffer at least one bout of herpes zoster. The vaccine reduces more than 50% incidence and more than 60% postherpetic neuralgia. This vaccine is recommended by ACIP for persons over 60 years. In this age group there are many patients with chronic lung conditions.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although several published studies have suggested that formoterol fumarate could be equivalent to short-acting beta2-agonists (SABAs) for the treatment of asthma exacerbations, its role in acute asthma treatment remains undefined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled formoterol (compared with SABAs) for the emergency department treatment of patients with acute asthma. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and manufactures' trial registers, without language restriction. The primary outcomes were spirometric measures. The secondary outcomes included final serum potassium level, heart rate, electrocardiographic QT interval corrected for heart rate, and total withdrawals. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials (including 576 participants) were selected. No significant difference could be detected between formoterol and SABAs for any of the selected time points: at 30 to 40 minutes after the first administration of study drugs (standardized mean difference, -0.19; 95% confidence interval, -0.56 to 0.17; I2 = 75%), at the end of treatment (standardized mean difference, -0.25; 95% confidence interval, -0.72 to 0.13; I2 = 89%), and at 60 to 90 minutes after the last dose (standardized mean difference, -0.13; 95% confidence interval, -0.55 to 0.28; I2 = 80%). Similarly, there were no significant differences between formoterol and SABAs regarding final serum potassium level, heart rate, QT interval, hospitalization rate, and total withdrawals. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that high-dose formoterol administered via dry powder inhaler is well tolerated and provides rapid and effective bronchodilation, similar to high-dose salbutamol or terbutaline via metered-dose inhaler or nebulizer. Formoterol may be used in the treatment of acute asthma in the emergency department setting.

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos