RESUMO
We sought to examine differences in anxiety, depression and coping strategies among younger (<64-year old) and older (≥65-year old) patients. Patients were assessed at baseline (T1), mid-point (T2) and on the last day of treatment (T3) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Ways of Coping. A linear mixed modeling approach was used. The study included 200 patients (gender: 70% women; diagnosis: 30% breast, 22% hematological, 18% gastrointestinal; disease stage: 60% advanced). Older patients who used an emotion-focused coping strategy had a greater decrease in anxiety at T3 compared to those that used problem-focused coping (p = .002).
Assuntos
Depressão , Neoplasias , Humanos , Adulto , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , Depressão/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Adaptação Psicológica , Ansiedade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Utilizing the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) chemotherapy toxicity risk score before starting treatment in older adults with cancer is guideline-recommended. However, this has not been tested in most developing countries. We investigated the use of a Portuguese version of the CARG score, including the association between this score and physical symptoms, among older Brazilian adults with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients aged ≥65 starting chemotherapy at a public Brazilian hospital. A Portuguese version of the CARG tool was created and linguistically validated. Patients were assessed for chemotherapy toxicity risk using the CARG score, and physical symptoms were evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General (FACT-G) scale. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify physical symptoms associated with high CARG scores, including pain, nausea, and fatigue. RESULTS: Older patients (65+) with cancer were enrolled (nâ¯=â¯117). Patients were mostly female (57.3%), white (52.1%), married (52.1%), and had less than high school education (75.2%). Breast, gastrointestinal and lung cancers were the most common diagnosis, and 66.7% had metastatic disease. Elevated pain scores (Pâ¯<â¯.01) were associated with higher chemotherapy toxicity risk scores, even after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: We created and implemented a Portuguese language version of the CARG tool. We found that, although physical symptoms are not included in the CARG model, elevated pain was strongly associated with having a high CARG score. As a modifiable risk factor, pain should be addressed among older patients with cancer considering chemotherapy, to help mitigate their risks for toxicity.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Brasil , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Inequalities exist between breast and gynecological cancer patients' experiences, leading to high levels of distress throughout the cancer journey. The present study aims to identify differences in source of biopsychosocial problem-related distress between women diagnosed with breast or gynecological cancers. METHODS: From 2009 to 2016, women with breast (n = 2111) and gynecological (n = 641) cancers were screened using the core items of the instrument You, Your Family, and City of Hope are a Team. This is a touch screen-based instrument that assess problem-related distress due to physical, practical, functional, emotional, and other problems and identifies types of assistance requested. Data were analyzed using the linear regression model. RESULTS: A significant difference in overall biopsychosocial problems rated as high distress was found between breast (M = 5.0) and gynecological (M = 6.2) cancer patients (P < .001). Gynecological cancer patients endorsed a greater number of problems to talk with a member of the team (alone or with written information), while both cancer groups requested written information equally. Gynecological cancer was associated with higher physical, functional, emotional, and total distress. Younger patients, non-Asian, and those with lower education and lower household income also reported greater distress. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecological cancer patients represent a high-risk group, reporting greater problem-related distress and higher levels of requested assistance. Age, education, race/ethnicity, and income were found to be potential risk factors. Findings highlight the importance of considering characteristics and special needs related to specific types of cancer to assist in the effective treatment of distress throughout the continuum of care.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: International guidelines recommend routine screening for distress as part of care practices. Accordingly, a Brazilian cancer center developed and implemented a distress screening program (DS) in 2007, which was enhanced in 2009 through the inclusion of a psychosocial care meeting group (DS + PCM) regarding patients' psychosocial needs. The current paper will provide an overview of the development and pilot implementation of this program and initial analyses to assess patient outcomes and report initial results to extend international research on this key aspect of cancer care. METHOD: Patients were assessed for distress, anxiety and depression, and in the DS+PCM phase for quality of life at the first day of chemotherapy infusion, at midpoint, and at treatment end. We compared data from program phases (DS vs DS + PCM), with a sequential cohort design and mixed effects modeling. RESULTS: Clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Patients receiving DS + PCM showed significantly lower distress and depression/anxiety upon chemotherapy initiation (Ps < .001). While both groups reported significantly lowered distress and total depression/anxiety scores across time (Ps < .003), patients receiving DS + PCM maintained the lowest distress and total anxiety/depression at all assessments. Patients from DS + PCM group also reported improvements in quality of life over time. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides preliminary evidence that a multidisciplinary structured screening program utilizing validated measures and team meetings is associated with reduced impairment in patients' psychological well being. This program provided more opportunities for collaboration among providers with increased multidisciplinary meetings, enabled patients to more easily report problems, and ensured rapid access to relevant resources.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Depressão/diagnóstico , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Neoplasias/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico , Adulto , Ansiedade/psicologia , Brasil , Comportamento Cooperativo , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Projetos Piloto , Estresse Psicológico/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to explore the impact of gender and hematological cancer grade on distress, anxiety, and depression in patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: A prospective study was done in a cohort of 104 patients with hematological cancer. We employed the (1) Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Problem List (PL) and (2) the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for assessments at baseline (T1), the halfway timepoint (T2), and completion of chemotherapy (T3). RESULTS: The proportion of patients experiencing significant distress (DT ≥ 4) decreased from the first to the last timepoint; the proportion experiencing anxiety and depression (as assessed by HADS) also decreased. Specifically, 50% of participants reported significant distress levels, 47.1% anxiety, and 26% depression at T1. At T2, the proportion of patients experiencing distress was reduced by 60.8%, by 76% for anxiety, and by 48.5% for depression; at T3, the reduction was close to 80% for all assessments compared with T1. Emotional and physical problems were most commonly reported. Significant reductions were discovered for distress and problem-related distress levels over time, and a significant interaction was found between gender and practical and physical problems (p < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Our findings suggest that female patients reported more distress, anxiety, and depression than male patients. Gender differences were related to problem-related distress but not to grade of neoplasm. We observed that, over the course of chemotherapy, the distress levels of patients with hematological cancer decrease over time.