RESUMO
Among its many functions, prolactin (PRL) participates in immune responses and promotes the activation, differentiation and proliferation of T cells. However, the mechanisms by which PRL regulates regulatory T (T(reg)) cells are still unknown. Our goal was to determine whether PRL plays a role in T(reg) function. We measured the expression of PRL and its receptor in T(reg) and effector T (T(eff)) cells from 15 healthy individuals. We also evaluated the functional activity of T(reg) cells by examining proliferation and cytokine secretion in cells activated with anti-CD3/CD28 in the presence or absence of PRL. We report that T(reg) cells constitutively expressed PRL receptor, whereas T(eff) cells required stimulation with anti-CD3/CD28 to induce PRL receptor expression. Expression of PRL was constitutive in both populations. We found that the addition of PRL inhibited the suppressor effect (proliferation) mediated by T(reg) cells in vitro, reducing suppression from 37.4 to 13% when PRL was added to co-cultures of T(reg) and T(eff) cells (P<0.05). Cultures treated with PRL favoured a Th1 cytokine profile, with increased production of TNF and IFNγ. We report for the first time that PRL receptor expression was constitutive in T(reg) cells but not in T(eff) cells, which require stimulation to induce PRL receptor expression. PRL inhibited the suppressive function of T(reg) cells, apparently through the induced secretion of Th1 cytokines.
Assuntos
Regulação para Baixo/efeitos dos fármacos , Prolactina/farmacologia , Linfócitos T Reguladores/efeitos dos fármacos , Linfócitos T Reguladores/imunologia , Adulto , Antígenos CD4/metabolismo , Separação Celular/métodos , Células Cultivadas , Citocinas/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Imunofenotipagem , Subunidade alfa de Receptor de Interleucina-2/metabolismo , Subunidade alfa de Receptor de Interleucina-7/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Receptores da Prolactina/genética , Receptores da Prolactina/metabolismo , Linfócitos T Reguladores/metabolismoRESUMO
The protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica is the etiological agent of human amebiasis. The pathology of the disease starts with the cytolysis of the host target cells by amoebae. It is initiated by the adhesion of trophozoites to the host cells, through surface lectin via specific receptors. These adherence lectins have been demonstrated to be highly conserved, and can be recognised by serum antibodies from patients with invasive amebiasis. Some of these molecules have been used as antigens in serologic studies, which has been very helpful in the diagnosis of invasive intestinal amebiasis. However, false-positive serologic reactivity can occur using E. histolytica extracts and purified antigens. Additional problems are because the extracts display a great enzymatic activity. Several diagnostic methods, using different molecules and techniques, have been described. However, the problem still remains since these tests are not capable of differentiating between amoebic liver abscess (ALA) and intestinal amebiasis.Here, the research has been addressed to the 66-kDa antigen, which is a part of the outer membrane proteins from the E. histolytica strain HM1-IMSS trophozoites. First of all, we characterized the 66-kDa antigen in order to prove the relevance. We found that the 66-kDa antigen is a part of the plasma membranes and is distributed rather homogeneously on the cell surface of trophozoites. Apparently, the 66-kDa antigen is a glycoprotein. Using a monoclonal antibody (MAb), we found 25% of inhibition in the erythrophagocytosis by the trophozoites. Starting form one monoclonal antibody, we prepared an anti-idiotype (anti-Id) antibody reagent, with the purpose of searching for the different expressions of the idiotype between the sera from ALA and the intestinal amebiasis patients. Moreover, we produced the antibody Ab3 that is capable of recognising the 66-kDa antigen; it means that the Ab2 displays the internal image of the antigen. We found that 91.6% of the serum from ALA patients displayed the expression of the Id. In contrast, 15.7% of the E. histolytica asymtomatic cyst carriers displayed the Id expression, 6.6% of the patients with another parasite infection, and 11% of the negative controls (serum from umbilical cords of newborn babies). Our results showed that the expression of the Id could be differentiated among the AHA patients from the other groups with a 91.6% sensibility and 88.3% specificity.