Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Argentina , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/normas , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate in a randomized trial the impact of three versus six cycles of cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone (CVPP) chemotherapy in favorable-prognosis and CVPP versus doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and etoposide (AOPE) plus involved-field radiotherapy (RT) in intermediate-prognosis previously untreated Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 256 patients evaluated, 80 with a favorable prognosis according to a prognostic index designed by the Grupo Argentina de Tratamiento de Leucemia Aguda (GATLA) were randomized to three versus six cycles of CVPP without RT and 176 with intermediate risk to CVPP versus AOPE, both for six cycles with RT between the third and fourth cycles of 30 Gy to the involved areas at diagnosis. CVPP consisted of intravenous (I.V.) cyclophosphamide and vinblastine on days 1 and 8, and oral procarbazine and prednisone on days 1 to 14, every 28 days. AOPE consisted of I.V. doxorubicin and vincristine on day 1, oral prednisone on days 1 to 5, and I.V. etoposide on days 1 and 3, every 28 days. RESULTS: Complete remission was obtained in 39 of 41 (95%) patients treated with three cycles of CVPP and 36 of 39 (92%) treated with six cycles in the favorable-risk group (difference not significant [NS]). In the intermediate-risk group, 89 of 92 (97%) treated with CVPP plus RT versus 75 of 84 (89%) treated with AOPE plus RT achieved a complete remission (P = .05). At 60 months, the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival rates in the favorable-risk group were 80% and 91% for CVPP x 3 and 84% and 97% for CVPP x 6, respectively (P = NS). In the intermediate-risk group, 60-month EFS rate for CVPP plus RT was 85%, compared with 66% for AOPE plus RT (P = .009). The overall survival rate was 95% versus 87% respectively (P = .157). CONCLUSION: Three cycles of CVPP without RT are equally effective as six cycles in the favorable-risk group. However, in the intermediate-group, CVPP plus RT is superior to AOPE plus RT, with significantly fewer events before and after induction (P = .009), without a difference in overall survival.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prednisolona/administração & dosagem , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Procarbazina/administração & dosagem , Prognóstico , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Vimblastina/administração & dosagem , Vincristina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in a multivariate analysis the prognostic factors associated with hematopoietic recovery and the supportive care requirements after autotransplant of progenitor cells (PC) from various sources: bone marrow (BMPC), BMPC & peripheral blood (PBPC), and PBPC alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 570 patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors underwent high-dose therapy followed by autotransplant. PBPC were obtained after mobilization with chemotherapy and/or cytokines. One-hundred five patients received BMPC, 217 received BMPC & PBPC and 248 PBPC alone; all of the patients received G-CSF or GM-CSF after infusion. RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis the recovery of neutrophils was adversely associated with low numbers of nucleated cells infused (P < 0.13), bone marrow progenitor cell source, and diagnosis of multiple myeloma and acute leukemia (P < 0.001). The factors that adversely affected platelet recovery were low number of nucleated cells and diagnosis of multiple myeloma and acute leukemia (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that BMPC adversely affect neutrophil recovery while low numbers of nucleated cells and diagnosis of multiple myeloma and acute leukemia adversely affect both neutrophil and platelet recovery.
Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea , Células Precursoras Eritroides , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Neoplasias Hematológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prognóstico , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
In April 1990, the Argentine Group for Treatment of Acute Leukemia began a multicenter trial for the treatment of previously untreated acute myeloblastic leukemia patients who were under 21 years of age. Initial treatment consisted of an 8-day induction phase with cytarabine together with idarubicin on days 3 to 5 and etoposide on days 6 to 8. A multidrug consolidation phase was subsequently administered and, after a treatment-free interval of 2 to 4 weeks, two 5-day intensification courses with high-dose cytarabine and etoposide were delivered with a 4-week interval between each course. Continuation therapy was started 2 to 4 weeks after the second course, with 6-thioguanine daily and cytarabine daily for 4 days every 4 weeks. Treatment was stopped after 18 months in children in continuous complete remission. A preliminary evaluation of this ongoing study included 36 patients with a mean age of 7.5 years (age range, 5 months to 16 years). The majority of patients had a French-American-British classification of M2 (n = 13) or M4 (n = 8). Complete remission was achieved by 91.7% of patients, while one died from sepsis in bone marrow hypoplasia and two were regarded as treatment failures. At a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 2 to 23 months) there were 12 adverse events: six bone marrow relapses, one bone marrow/skin relapse, and five deaths in complete remission (all deaths occurred during the consolidation phase). During the induction phase most of the patients experienced prolonged myelosuppression, and grade 3 to 4 toxicity (according to the Children's Cancer Group criteria) was frequently seen. Alopecia was universal. However, toxicity was manageable. We conclude that idarubicin in combination with cytarabine and etoposide is a highly effective regimen for induction in children with acute myeloblastic leukemia.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Idarubicina/administração & dosagem , Leucemia Mieloide/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Indução de Remissão , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare four first generation chemotherapy regimes (FGR) used by GATLA in low and intermediate grade lymphomas. Versus a second generation regimen called CAVPE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 205 patients treated with FGR (79 with BACOP, 89 with COPP, 19 with CHOP, and 18 with CNOP), and 244 others treated with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone and etoposide (CAVPE) were included. Two randomized phase III multicentric studies, COPP vs BACOPP and CHOP vs CNOP, as a whole group, were compared with the second generation scheme, CAVPE. All the patients with FGR received 6 monthly treatment courses, and the CAVPE patients were given 8 monthly courses. RESULTS: The median age was 55 years (18-85) for the FGR group and 51 years (15-79) for the CAVPE group. The stage distribution for both FGR and CAVPE groups was, respectively, as follows: II: 38 and 55 cases; III 80 and 84 cases; IV: 87 and 105 cases. No significant differences were found between both groups when comparing other characteristics of the patients, namely, sex, symptoms, mediastinal, abdominal or extranodal involvement, liver, spleen or bone-marrow infiltration, and bulky tumoural mass. The percentage of complete remission (CR) was 52% (107/205) in the patients treated with FGR, and 67% (163/244) in the CAVPE group (p < 0.001). The estimated probability of sustained first CR at 72 months was 38% for the FGR group and 54% for the CAVPE group (p = 0.0167), whereas 17% and 36%, respectively, of the evaluable patients were alive and well, with no signs of disease progression (p = 0.000). The 72-month survival was estimated in 32% and 51%, respectively, for each group (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: 1. CAVPE seems to offer better responses and disease-free survival in this non-selected group of low and intermediate lymphoma patients. 2. The better results in terms of CR and lower incidence of relapses attained with CAVPE with regard to FGR are probably related with a number of facts, such as the use of more aggressive drugs, higher doses, a better drug combination rationale, the inclusion of new drugs, such as etoposide, or a selection of the patients.