RESUMO
Resumen El tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST tiene barreras dependiendo de la región geográfica. La angioplastia coronaria primaria es el tratamiento de elección, siempre y cuando sea realizada dentro de tiempo y por operadores experimentados. Sin embargo, cuando no está disponible, la administración de fibrinólisis y el envío para angioplastia de rescate, en caso de reperfusión negativa, es la mejor estrategia. De la misma manera, la angioplastia coronaria, como parte de una estrategia farmacoinvasiva, es la mejor alternativa cuando hay reperfusión positiva. El desarrollo de redes de tratamiento del infarto aumenta el número de pacientes reperfundidos dentro de los tiempos recomendados y mejora los desenlaces. En América Latina, los programas nacionales para el tratamiento del infarto deben centrarse en mejorar los resultados y el éxito a largo plazo depende de trabajar hacia objetivos definidos y obtener métricas de rendimiento, por lo tanto, estos deben desarrollar métricas para cuantificar su desempeño. El siguiente documento discute todas estas alternativas y sugiere oportunidades de mejora.
Abstract The treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction has barriers depending on the geographic region. Primary coronary angioplasty is the treatment of choice, if it is performed on time and by experienced operators. However, when it is not available, the administration of fibrinolysis and referral for rescue angioplasty, in case of negative reperfusion, is the best strategy. In the same way, coronary angioplasty, as part of a pharmacoinvasive strategy, is the best alternative when there is positive reperfusion. The development of infarct treatment networks increases the number of patients reperfused within the recommended times and improves outcomes. In Latin America, national myocardial infarction treatment programs should focus on improving outcomes, and long-term success depends on working toward defined goals and enhancing functionality, therefore programs should develop capacity to measure their performance. The following document discusses all of these alternatives and suggests opportunities for improvement.
RESUMO
The treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction has barriers depending on the geographic region. Primary coronary angioplasty is the treatment of choice, if it is performed on time and by experienced operators. However, when it is not available, the administration of fibrinolysis and referral for rescue angioplasty, in case of negative reperfusion, is the best strategy. In the same way, coronary angioplasty, as part of a pharmacoinvasive strategy, is the best alternative when there is positive reperfusion. The development of infarct treatment networks increases the number of patients reperfused within the recommended times and improves outcomes. In Latin America, national myocardial infarction treatment programs should focus on improving outcomes, and long-term success depends on working toward defined goals and enhancing functionality, therefore programs should develop capacity to measure their performance. The following document discusses all of these alternatives and suggests opportunities for improvement.
El tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST tiene barreras dependiendo de la región geográfica. La angioplastia coronaria primaria es el tratamiento de elección, siempre y cuando sea realizada dentro de tiempo y por operadores experimentados. Sin embargo, cuando no está disponible, la administración de fibrinólisis y el envío para angioplastia de rescate, en caso de reperfusión negativa, es la mejor estrategia. De la misma manera, la angioplastia coronaria, como parte de una estrategia farmacoinvasiva, es la mejor alternativa cuando hay reperfusión positiva. El desarrollo de redes de tratamiento del infarto aumenta el número de pacientes reperfundidos dentro de los tiempos recomendados y mejora los desenlaces. En América Latina, los programas nacionales para el tratamiento del infarto deben centrarse en mejorar los resultados y el éxito a largo plazo depende de trabajar hacia objetivos definidos y obtener métricas de rendimiento, por lo tanto, estos deben desarrollar métricas para cuantificar su desempeño. El siguiente documento discute todas estas alternativas y sugiere oportunidades de mejora.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study explores the safety and efficacy of thin strut MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. BACKGROUND: In interventional cardiology, the emergence of BRS technology is catalyzing the next paradigm shift. METHODS: The MeRes-1 Extend was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, open-label study enrolling 64 patients in Spain, Macedonia, Brazil, South Africa, Malaysia, and Indonesia. The safety endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) which composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). The imaging efficacy endpoint was mean in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 69 target lesions were identified in 64 enrolled patients (mean age 58.30 ± 9.02 years). Of the treated lesions, 49 (71.01%) lesions were of type B2/C. Procedural and device success was achieved in 64 and 62 patients, respectively. At 2-year follow-up, MACE was reported in one patient (1.61%) in the form of ID-TLR. There was no case of MI, cardiac death or scaffold thrombosis through 2-year. In a subset of 32 patients, paired QCA showed mean in-scaffold LLL of 0.18 ± 0.31 mm at 6-month follow-up. In a subset of 21 patients, OCT revealed 97.95 ± 3.69% strut coverage with mean scaffold area of 7.56 ± 1.79 mm2 and no evidence of strut malapposition. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and imaging outcomes of MeRes-1 Extend trial demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy of MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting BRS in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Infarto do MiocárdioRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study explores the safety and efficacy of thin strut MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. BACKGROUND: In interventional cardiology, the emergence of BRS technology is catalyzing the next paradigm shift. METHODS: The MeRes-1 Extend was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, open-label study enrolling 64 patients in Spain, Macedonia, Brazil, South Africa, Malaysia, and Indonesia. The safety endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) which composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). The imaging efficacy endpoint was mean in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 69 target lesions were identified in 64 enrolled patients (mean age 58.30 ± 9.02 years). Of the treated lesions, 49 (71.01%) lesions were of type B2/C. Procedural and device success was achieved in 64 and 62 patients, respectively. At 2-year follow-up, MACE was reported in one patient (1.61%) in the form of ID-TLR. There was no case of MI, cardiac death or scaffold thrombosis through 2-year. In a subset of 32 patients, paired QCA showed mean in-scaffold LLL of 0.18 ± 0.31 mm at 6-month follow-up. In a subset of 21 patients, OCT revealed 97.95 ± 3.69% strut coverage with mean scaffold area of 7.56 ± 1.79 mm2 and no evidence of strut malapposition. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and imaging outcomes of MeRes-1 Extend trial demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy of MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting BRS in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.
Assuntos
Fármacos Cardiovasculares , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Implantes Absorvíveis , Idoso , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sirolimo/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND The long- term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention can be improved by replacing metallic drug eluting stents with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. The MeRes-1 Extend trial was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of a novel thin-strut MeRes100 bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Meril Life Sci ences) in a diverse patient population. METHODS The MeRes-1 Extend was a prospective, multicenter, sin gle-arm study that enrolled 64 patients in Spain, Macedonia, Brazil, South Africa, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Major adverse cardiac events, consisting of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia driven target lesion revascularisation, were the safety endpoint. At baseline and 6-month follow-up, quantitative coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography were performed. RESULTS Of all patients enrolled (mean age: 58.30 9.02 years), 76.56% had hypertension, 26.56% had diabetes mellitus, 48.44% had dyslipidemia, and 28.13% had a previous myocardial infarction; 68.75% of patients presented with stable angina, 9.38% with unstable angina, and 21.88% with silent ischemia. A total of 69 target lesions (mean length: 14.37 5.89 mm) were detected of which 71.01% were type B2/C. Procedural and device success were achieved in 64 and 62 patients, respectively. Major adverse cardiac events rate was reported in 1 patient (1.61%) in the form of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization; there were no cases of myocardial infarction, car diac death, or scaffold thrombosis. At 6-month angiographic follow-up (n » 32), mean in-scaffold late lumen loss was 0.18 0.31 mm. Optical coherence tomography analysis (n » 21) showed 97.95 3.69% strut coverage and mean scaffold area of 7.56 1.79 mm2, with no strut malapposition. Updated data will be presented during Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2020 annual meeting. CONCLUSION Two-year clinical and 6-month imaging outcomes of MeRes-1 Extend trial demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy of novel thin-strut MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.
Assuntos
Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária PercutâneaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The development of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) offers a new treatment strategy for coronary artery lesion by replacement of a permanent metallic scaffold with a temporary scaffold and eradicating a nidus for very late adverse events. The first-in-human MeRes-1 trial reported favorable safety and efficacy of thin-strut (100 mm) MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting BRS (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., India) in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. Hence, to reaffirm the outcomes of the MeRes-1 trial, the MeRes-1 Extend trial sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the MeRes100 BRS in diverse patient population in Europe, Brazil, South Africa, and Asia Pacific. METHODS: The MeRes-1 Extend was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study of MeRes100 BRS in 64 patients from Spain, Macedonia, Brazil, South Africa, Malaysia, and Indonesia. The safety endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). Quantitative coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Among 64 enrolled patients (mean age: 58.30 _ 9.02 years), 26.56% had diabetes mellitus and 68.75% patients presented with stable angina. Of 69 target lesions, 71.01% were classified as type B2/C; average lesion length was 14.37 _ 5.89 mm and mean reference vessel diameter was 3.03 _ 0.35 mm. Procedural and device success was achieved in 64 and 62 patients, respectively. MACE was reported in 1 patient (1.61%) at 24-month follow-up in the form of ID-TLR with absence of MI, cardiac death, or scaffold thrombosis. At 6-month angiographic follow-up in a subset of 32 patients, mean in-scaffold LLL was 0.18 _ 0.31 mm. OCT analysis (n » 21) reported 97.95 _ 3.69% strut coverage with mean scaffold area of 7.56 _ 1.79 mm2 and no evidence of strut malapposition. CONCLUSION: Based on 2-year clinical and 6-month imaging outcomes, the MeRes-1 Extend trial established favorable safety and efficacy of MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting BRS in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. (AU)
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Alicerces Teciduais , Stents FarmacológicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A poor ability of recommended risk scores for predicting in-hospital bleeding has been reported in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). No study assessed the prediction of post-discharge bleeding in the elderly. The new BleeMACS score (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome), was designed to predict post-discharge bleeding in ACS patients. We aimed to assess the predictive ability of the BleeMACS score in elderly patients. METHODS: We assessed the incidence and characteristics of severe bleeding after discharge in ACS patients aged ≥ 75 years. Bleeding was defined as any intracranial bleeding or bleeding leading to hospitalization and/or red blood transfusion, occurring within the first year after discharge. We assessed the predictive ability of the BleeMACS score according to age by Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression analysis, calculating receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curves (AUC). RESULTS: The BleeMACS registry included 15,401 patients of whom 3,376/15,401 (21.9%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Elderly patients were more commonly treated with clopidogrel and less often treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel. Of 3,376 elderly patients, 190 (5.6%) experienced post-discharge bleeding. The incidence of bleeding was moderately higher in elderly patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-2.77). The predictive ability of the BleeMACS score was moderately lower in elderly patients (AUC, 0.652 vs. 0.691, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with ACS had a significantly higher incidence of post-discharge bleeding. Despite a lower predictive ability in older patients, the BleeMACS score exhibited an acceptable performance in these patients.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Hemorragias Intracranianas/induzido quimicamente , Alta do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Ásia/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Hemorragias Intracranianas/diagnóstico , Hemorragias Intracranianas/epidemiologia , Hemorragias Intracranianas/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/efeitos adversos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Ticagrelor/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Anthracyclines are cytostatic antibiotics discovered almost half a century ago exerting their action through inhibition of topoisomerase II. The two most representative drugs are doxorubicin and daunorubicin and they have been proven as useful antineoplastics and are widely prescribed in daily oncology practice; unfortunately, cardiotoxicity has been a limiting factor when it comes to their use. Diverse mechanisms have been involved in anthracycline cardiotoxicity, none of which are capable of causing the whole clinical picture by itself. Traditionally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) have received more attention, although recently basic research has proven other factors to be as important as ROS. These factors mainly involve sarcomeric structure disruption, toxic accumulation of metabolites, iron metabolism, energetic alterations and inflammation. The role of genetics has been studied by some groups, although a clear genotype-response relationship is yet to be elucidated. With the improved survival from different oncologic diseases we are witnessing more cases of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and the advent of new anticancer drugs poses several challenges for the cardiologist, highlighting the importance of a deep knowledge of the main mechanisms inducing this toxicity.
Hace casi medio siglo se descubrieron las antraciclinas; estas son antibióticos citostáticos inhibidores de la topoisomerasa II. Los 2 fármacos más representativos de este grupo son la doxorrubicina y la daunorrubicina. Estos fármacos han demostrado ser eficaces antineoplásicos y han sido ampliamente utilizados en la práctica oncológica. Desafortunadamente, la cardiotoxicidad sigue siendo un elemento limitante para su uso. Los mecanismos mediante los cuales estos fármacos ocasionan cardiotoxicidad son múltiples pero ninguno de ellos de forma individual es capaz de explicar el cuadro clínico por completo. Casi siempre se ha considerado que la formación de especies reactivas de oxígeno era responsable de gran parte de la toxicidad, sin embargo la experimentación básica reciente ha demostrado que hay otros factores, entre los que destacan las alteraciones en la estructura sarcomérica, la acumulación de metabolitos tóxicos, las alteraciones del metabolismo del hierro o de los mecanismos energéticos, y la liberación de mediadores de inflamación. Por otra parte, diversos grupos han investigado la intervención que la genética podría tener en el desarrollo de esta enfermedad, si bien no se puede definir aún una clara correlación genotipo-respuesta. Con el aumento de la supervivencia por el tratamiento de diversas enfermedades oncológicas, se están detectando más casos de cardiotoxicidad mediada por quimioterapia; y con la aparición de nuevos fármacos quimioterápicos se añaden nuevos retos, con lo que se demuestra la importancia del estudio profundo de los mecanismos causales.
Assuntos
Humanos , Antraciclinas/efeitos adversos , Cardiomiopatias/induzido quimicamente , Antraciclinas/metabolismo , CardiologiaRESUMO
Anthracyclines are cytostatic antibiotics discovered almost half a century ago exerting their action through inhibition of topoisomerase II. The two most representative drugs are doxorubicin and daunorubicin and they have been proven as useful antineoplastics and are widely prescribed in daily oncology practice; unfortunately, cardiotoxicity has been a limiting factor when it comes to their use. Diverse mechanisms have been involved in anthracycline cardiotoxicity, none of which are capable of causing the whole clinical picture by itself. Traditionally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) have received more attention, although recently basic research has proven other factors to be as important as ROS. These factors mainly involve sarcomeric structure disruption, toxic accumulation of metabolites, iron metabolism, energetic alterations and inflammation. The role of genetics has been studied by some groups, although a clear genotype-response relationship is yet to be elucidated. With the improved survival from different oncologic diseases we are witnessing more cases of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and the advent of new anticancer drugs poses several challenges for the cardiologist, highlighting the importance of a deep knowledge of the main mechanisms inducing this toxicity.