Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sao Paulo Med J ; 137(1): 45-53, 2019 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31116270

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Both postoperative pain control and range of motion are important in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, in the literature, there is little comparison of peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular infiltration techniques using levobupivacaine. The aim of our study was to measure pain with visual analogue scale (VAS) and knee range of motion (ROM) between in patients undergoing adductor canal block (ACB) for TKA using levobupivacaine compared to periarticular levobupivacaine infiltration (PAI-L). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized clinical trial in a university hospital. METHODS: Patients aged 40-85 years who underwent unilateral TKA were included; 39 were treated withperiarticular infiltration using 40 ml (0.125 mg) of levobupivacaine (PAI-L group); and 40 were treated with ACB using 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine (ACB-L group). Postoperative pain scores at rest and during active physical therapy were assessed using a VAS, along with knee ROM in flexion and extension. In addition, 100-foot walking time results, total morphine consumption and time of first analgesia requirement were recorded postoperatively. RESULTS: VAS scores at rest and during active physical therapy and the total amount of morphine consumed were lower in the ACB-L group than in the PAI-L group (P < 0.05). In contrast, knee ROM in flexion and extension and 100-foot walking times were greater in the PAI-L group than in the ACB-L group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ACB-L was superior to PAI-L regarding pain treatment after TKA; however, PAI-L was superior to ACB-L regarding postoperative ROM and walking ability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ACTRN-12618000438257.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Levobupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Músculo Esquelético/efeitos dos fármacos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/efeitos dos fármacos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Teste de Caminhada/métodos
2.
São Paulo med. j ; São Paulo med. j;137(1): 45-53, Jan.-Feb. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1004748

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Both postoperative pain control and range of motion are important in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, in the literature, there is little comparison of peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular infiltration techniques using levobupivacaine. The aim of our study was to measure pain with visual analogue scale (VAS) and knee range of motion (ROM) between in patients undergoing adductor canal block (ACB) for TKA using levobupivacaine compared to periarticular levobupivacaine infiltration (PAI-L). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized clinical trial in a university hospital. METHODS: Patients aged 40-85 years who underwent unilateral TKA were included; 39 were treated withperiarticular infiltration using 40 ml (0.125 mg) of levobupivacaine (PAI-L group); and 40 were treated with ACB using 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine (ACB-L group). Postoperative pain scores at rest and during active physical therapy were assessed using a VAS, along with knee ROM in flexion and extension. In addition, 100-foot walking time results, total morphine consumption and time of first analgesia requirement were recorded postoperatively. RESULTS: VAS scores at rest and during active physical therapy and the total amount of morphine consumed were lower in the ACB-L group than in the PAI-L group (P < 0.05). In contrast, knee ROM in flexion and extension and 100-foot walking times were greater in the PAI-L group than in the ACB-L group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ACB-L was superior to PAI-L regarding pain treatment after TKA; however, PAI-L was superior to ACB-L regarding postoperative ROM and walking ability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ACTRN-12618000438257.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Músculo Esquelético/efeitos dos fármacos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Levobupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Período Pós-Operatório , Valores de Referência , Fatores de Tempo , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/efeitos dos fármacos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Teste de Caminhada/métodos , Injeções Intramusculares
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA