RESUMO
Amoxicillin/sulbactam is a modern antimicrobial combination. This combination proved to be useful for the treatment of several infections caused by different microorganisms, mainly with the beta-lactamase-producing species. In this review we present the most relevant pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and clinical information associated with its use.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Amoxicilina/farmacocinética , Amoxicilina/farmacologia , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Sulbactam/farmacocinética , Sulbactam/farmacologiaRESUMO
We designed a 4-way crossover, ex-vivo pharmacodynamic study to compare the bactericidal rate of amoxicillin/sulbactam (AMX-SUL), azithromycin (AZM), doxycycline (DOX) and levofloxacin (LVX) against Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619. Six volunteers were randomized to receive alternatively a single tablet of the above drugs. Venous blood samples were obtained immediately before and at 2, 4 and 6 h after dose to perform time-kill studies and to determine antibiotic levels in serum. AMX-SUL was the only drug showing bactericidal activity with the sera obtained at every time after dose, as defined by a > or = 3-log10 cfu/ml decrease in the viable cell counts compared to the original inoculum after a 24-h incubation. AZM was only inhibitory at 2h after dose (i.e. a 1.3-log10 cfu/ml decrease in the viable cell counts) and proved bactericidal at 4 and 6 h post-dose. LVX proved bactericidal with the 2-h serum, was only inhibitory with the 4-h serum (e.g. a 1.5-log10 cfu/ml decrease) and was unable to avoid bacterial growth at 6 h post-dose. Bacterial growth was observed with DOX at every time after dose. This study may shed light on the understanding of breakthrough pneumococcal bacteremia during the course of oral therapy with AZM in patients with community-acquired nia (CAP), as well as the increasing treatment failures observed with LVX, and the selection of bacterial resistance during therapy reported with both drugs. It also provides the basis for a "warning signal" on the use of oral DOX and confirms the efficacy of AMX-SUL.
Assuntos
Amoxicilina/farmacologia , Azitromicina/farmacologia , Doxiciclina/farmacologia , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/farmacologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Sulbactam/farmacologia , Adulto , Amoxicilina/sangue , Análise de Variância , Azitromicina/sangue , Atividade Bactericida do Sangue , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Estudos Cross-Over , Doxiciclina/sangue , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ofloxacino/sangue , Probabilidade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Teste Bactericida do Soro , Método Simples-Cego , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Sulbactam/sangueRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acid-supressing capacity of omeprazole (OZ) 20 mg tablets vs pantoprazole (PZ) 20 and 40 mg tablets, in healthy volunteers, with 24-h intragastric pH-metry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open, randomized, cross-over trial in 10 healthy volunteers; on days 0.8 and 22, 24-h intragastric pH-metry. Day 0, basal, thereafter 7 days with OZ or PZ 20 mg/day; day 8, pH-metry, then "wash out" for 7 days and thereafter 7 more days' therapy with PZ or OZ. On day 22 a 24-h intragastric pH control was performed again. In the last treatment stage, all of them were administered pantoprazole 40 mg/day for 8 days again with a 24-h pH recording at the end. RESULTS: 24-h pH-metry expressed as the time (hours) in which the pH was < or = 4 and the values as mean +/- standard deviation. BASAL 22.12 +/- 1.54, POST-OZ 9.78 +/- 6.72, POST-PZ 20 15.65 +/- 5.65, POST-PZ 40 8.57 +/- 5.93. Statistical evaluation with two way repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.0001. Newman Keuls post-hoc test: (1) vs (2) p < 0.003; (1) vs (3) p < 0.03; (2) vs (4) 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results it might be stated that both proton pump inhibitors have acid-supressing capacity and omeprazole in equal dosis is more effective than pantoprazole as acid-supressor, with statistically significative differences. There was no difference between 20 mg omeprazole and 40 mg pantoprazole.
Assuntos
Antiulcerosos/farmacologia , Benzimidazóis/farmacologia , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Omeprazol/farmacologia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Sulfóxidos/farmacologia , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbenzimidazóis , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pantoprazol , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acid-supressing capacity of omeprazole (OZ) 20 mg tablets vs pantoprazole (PZ) 20 and 40 mg tablets, in healthy volunteers, with 24-h intragastric pH-metry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open, randomized, cross-over trial in 10 healthy volunteers; on days 0.8 and 22, 24-h intragastric pH-metry. Day 0, basal, thereafter 7 days with OZ or PZ 20 mg/day; day 8, pH-metry, then [quot ]wash out[quot ] for 7 days and thereafter 7 more days therapy with PZ or OZ. On day 22 a 24-h intragastric pH control was performed again. In the last treatment stage, all of them were administered pantoprazole 40 mg/day for 8 days again with a 24-h pH recording at the end. RESULTS: 24-h pH-metry expressed as the time (hours) in which the pH was < or = 4 and the values as mean +/- standard deviation. BASAL 22.12 +/- 1.54, POST-OZ 9.78 +/- 6.72, POST-PZ 20 15.65 +/- 5.65, POST-PZ 40 8.57 +/- 5.93. Statistical evaluation with two way repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.0001. Newman Keuls post-hoc test: (1) vs (2) p < 0.003; (1) vs (3) p < 0.03; (2) vs (4) 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results it might be stated that both proton pump inhibitors have acid-supressing capacity and omeprazole in equal dosis is more effective than pantoprazole as acid-supressor, with statistically significative differences. There was no difference between 20 mg omeprazole and 40 mg pantoprazole.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acid-supressing capacity of omeprazole (OZ) 20 mg tablets vs pantoprazole (PZ) 20 and 40 mg tablets, in healthy volunteers, with 24-h intragastric pH-metry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open, randomized, cross-over trial in 10 healthy volunteers; on days 0.8 and 22, 24-h intragastric pH-metry. Day 0, basal, thereafter 7 days with OZ or PZ 20 mg/day; day 8, pH-metry, then "wash out" for 7 days and thereafter 7 more days therapy with PZ or OZ. On day 22 a 24-h intragastric pH control was performed again. In the last treatment stage, all of them were administered pantoprazole 40 mg/day for 8 days again with a 24-h pH recording at the end. RESULTS: 24-h pH-metry expressed as the time (hours) in which the pH was < or = 4 and the values as mean +/- standard deviation. BASAL 22.12 +/- 1.54, POST-OZ 9.78 +/- 6.72, POST-PZ 20 15.65 +/- 5.65, POST-PZ 40 8.57 +/- 5.93. Statistical evaluation with two way repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.0001. Newman Keuls post-hoc test: (1) vs (2) p < 0.003; (1) vs (3) p < 0.03; (2) vs (4) 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results it might be stated that both proton pump inhibitors have acid-supressing capacity and omeprazole in equal dosis is more effective than pantoprazole as acid-supressor, with statistically significative differences. There was no difference between 20 mg omeprazole and 40 mg pantoprazole.(AU)
Assuntos
Estudo Comparativo , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Benzimidazóis/farmacologia , Omeprazol/farmacologia , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Bombas de Próton/antagonistas & inibidores , Sulfóxidos/farmacologia , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Omeprazol/administração & dosagem , Estudos Cross-Over , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Inibidores Enzimáticos/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Tempo , Determinação da Acidez Gástrica , Distribuição Aleatória , Análise de Variância , Manometria , Sulfóxidos/administração & dosagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acid-supressing capacity of omeprazole (OZ) 20 mg tablets vs pantoprazole (PZ) 20 and 40 mg tablets, in healthy volunteers, with 24-h intragastric pH-metry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open, randomized, cross-over trial in 10 healthy volunteers; on days 0.8 and 22, 24-h intragastric pH-metry. Day 0, basal, thereafter 7 days with OZ or PZ 20 mg/day; day 8, pH-metry, then "wash out" for 7 days and thereafter 7 more days' therapy with PZ or OZ. On day 22 a 24-h intragastric pH control was performed again. In the last treatment stage, all of them were administered pantoprazole 40 mg/day for 8 days again with a 24-h pH recording at the end. RESULTS: 24-h pH-metry expressed as the time (hours) in which the pH was < or = 4 and the values as mean +/- standard deviation. BASAL 22.12 +/- 1.54, POST-OZ 9.78 +/- 6.72, POST-PZ 20 15.65 +/- 5.65, POST-PZ 40 8.57 +/- 5.93. Statistical evaluation with two way repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.0001. Newman Keuls post-hoc test: (1) vs (2) p < 0.003; (1) vs (3) p < 0.03; (2) vs (4) 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results it might be stated that both proton pump inhibitors have acid-supressing capacity and omeprazole in equal dosis is more effective than pantoprazole as acid-supressor, with statistically significative differences. There was no difference between 20 mg omeprazole and 40 mg pantoprazole.