RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) has been proposed as an alternative to more complex overdenture designs as a simplified implant intervention for edentulous patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to run a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial comparing the SIMO and the conventional complete denture (CCD) treatment. Imediately loaded external hexagon implant and ball attachment were used for the overdenture goup. Direct costs related to therapies were identified and valuated throughout a 1-year period after delivery, in Brazilian currency (R$) and converted into international dollars (I$) using purchase power parity exchange rates. Treatment effectiveness was measured using the OHIP-Edent and satisfaction scores for calculation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). RESULTS: Outcomes were assessed at the 1-year follow-up for 65 patients (CCD=34; SIMO=31). Overall OHIP-Edent and satisfaction scores improved significantly in the SIMO group, while remained unchanged in the CCD group. The mean overall costs were R$1,179.04 (I$590.99) for the CCD group and R$2,127.91 (I$1,068.20) for the SIMO group - 80.7% incremental cost for SIMO. The ICER calculation for SIMO treatment showed a mean cost of I$48.20 for 1-point reduction in OHIP-Edent scores, and I$12.56 for 1-point increase in satisfaction score. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the effectiveness of this simplified and low-cost implant intervention for edentulous patients. SIMO also seems a cost-effective alternative to the CCD and the relatively low incremental cost may potentially increase the utilization of dental implants among older subjects, especially those with limited financial resources. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The immediately loaded single-implant mandibular overdenture was superior to the conventional complete denture in terms of patient-reported outcome measures at a low incremental cost.
Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Revestimento de Dentadura , Análise Custo-Benefício , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Retenção de Dentadura , Prótese Total , Prótese Total Inferior , Humanos , Mandíbula , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Denture fracture is one of the most common complications in prosthodontics and implant overdentures are reported to be at higher risk of fractures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the incidence and factors associated with the occurrence of fractures in patients treated with a single implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) opposed by a conventional maxillary complete denture. METHODS: A cohort of 152 patients, 65.1% female and 34.9% male, mean age 65.4 ± 8.5 years, were prospectively followed-up for a minimum of 1 year and up to 6.7 years. Patients received a single midline mandibular implant with a retention system incorporated in the overdenture: Straumann ball abutment and gold elliptical matrix (n = 37), Neodent ball/nylon matrix (n = 83), or Neodent Equator/nylon matrix (n = 32). Fracture was defined as a complete separation of denture parts and classified as midline fracture (over the implant region), or elsewhere. No metal reinforcement was incorporated into the overdenture. Incidence rates, life table analysis, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Overdenture fractures occurred in 49 patients (32.2% incidence), with repeated fractures in 16 patients. The majority of fractures were associated with function (42.6%) or due to the overdenture being dropped (36.8%). Overall incidence density was 0.14 fracture/patient/year. The risk of fracture was associated with the duration of the overdenture use (HR = 0.84; 95%CI = 0.71-0.99). CONCLUSION: Midline denture fracture was a common complication in patients receiving SIMO treatment regardless of the implant / retention system. The use of metal reinforcement may be considered to reduce the risk of recurrent fractures. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This clinical prospective study showed that single-implant mandibular overdentures are at high risk of midline fractures. Proper post-insertion monitoring and the identification and management of patient's individual risk factors are essential for the successful treatment in the long-term.