RESUMO
Introduction: COPD and interstitial lung disease (ILD) are significant chronic respiratory disorders, impacting quality of life. Respiratory muscle roles and differences remain not entirely clear. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the degree of recruitment of the respiratory muscles and the work of breathing in COPD and ILD during exercise. Methods: We compared the sensory-mechanical relationships in COPD, ILD and healthy controls (n=20 each). They performed pulmonary function, noninvasive and invasive respiratory muscle strength, surface electromyography and work-of-breathing assessments. Results: COPD and ILD did not show lower static muscle strength compared to controls, but did show poor performance in the exercise test with increased transdiaphragmatic pressure (P di). In ILD, there was a higher increase in oesophageal pressure and a lower gastric pressure (P ga) on inspiration; in COPD, there was a significant increase in P ga on inspiration. In ILD, there is greater recruitment of accessory inspiratory muscles, whereas in COPD, there is marked use of both inspiratory and expiratory muscles. The neuromechanical inefficiency (increased neural respiratory drive without the corresponding tidal volume) was found in both diseases. In COPD, there is a considerable increase in elastic work to overcome intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) and expiratory work of breathing, whereas in ILD, non-PEEPi elastic work of breathing is the highest part of the total work of breathing. Conclusions: Early and increased activity of the respiratory muscles and work-of-breathing components significantly contribute to dyspnoea, exercise intolerance and neuromechanical inefficiency of ventilation in COPD and ILD. The mechanisms of P di generation were different between diseases.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis (UDP) may present with dyspnoea without specific cause and limited ability to exercise. We aimed to investigate the diaphragm contraction mechanisms and nondiaphragmatic inspiratory muscle activation during exercise in patients with UDP, compared with healthy individuals. METHODS: Pulmonary function, as well as volitional and nonvolitional inspiratory muscle strength were evaluated in 35 patients and in 20 healthy subjects. Respiratory pressures and electromyography of scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles were continuously recorded during incremental maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing until symptom limitation. Dyspnoea was assessed at rest, every 2â min during exercise and at the end of exercise with a modified Borg scale. MAIN RESULTS: Inspiratory muscle strength measurements were significantly lower for patients in comparison to controls (all p<0.05). Patients achieved lower peak of exercise (lower oxygen consumption) compared to controls, with both gastric (-9.8±4.6 cmH2O versus 8.9±6.0â cmH2O) and transdiaphragmatic (6.5±5.5â cmH2O versus 26.9±10.9â cmH2O) pressures significantly lower, along with larger activation of both scalene (40±22% EMGmax versus 18±14% EMGmax) and sternocleidomastoid (34±22% EMGmax versus 14±8% EMGmax). In addition, the paralysis group presented significant differences in breathing pattern during exercise (lower tidal volume and higher respiratory rate) with more dyspnoea symptoms compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The paralysis group presented with exercise limitation accompanied by impairment in transdiaphragmatic pressure generation and larger accessory inspiratory muscles activation compared to controls, thereby contributing to a neuromechanical dissociation and increased dyspnoea perception.
RESUMO
Patients with diaphragm dysfunction experience exertional dyspnoea. Respiratory muscle function assessments can identify breathing abnormalities and IMT might help to reduce symptoms (mostly via improvements in non-diaphragmatic muscles). http://bit.ly/2QdxNFP.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis (UDP) have unexplained dyspnea, exercise limitations, and reduction in inspiratory muscle capacity. We aimed to evaluate the generation of pressure in each hemidiaphragm separately and its contribution to overall inspiratory strength. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients, 9 in right paralysis group (RP) and 18 in left paralysis group (LP), with forced vital capacity (FVC) < 80% pred, and 20 healthy controls (CG), with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) > 80% pred and FVC > 80% pred, were evaluated for lung function, maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) pressure measurements, diaphragm ultrasound, and transdiaphragmatic pressure during magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (PdiTw). RESULTS: RP and LP had significant inspiratory muscle weakness compared to controls, detected by MIP (- 57.4 ± 16.9 for RP; - 67.1 ± 28.5 for LP and - 103.1 ± 30.4 cmH2O for CG) and also by PdiTW (5.7 ± 4 for RP; 4.8 ± 2.3 for LP and 15.3 ± 5.7 cmH2O for CG). The PdiTw was reduced even when the non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm was stimulated, mainly due to the low contribution of gastric pressure (around 30%), regardless of whether the paralysis was in the right or left hemidiaphragm. On the other hand, in CG, esophagic and gastric pressures had similar contribution to the overall Pdi (around 50%). Comparing both paralyzed and non-paralyzed hemidiaphragms, the mobility during quiet and deep breathing, and thickness at functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capacity (TLC), were significantly reduced in paralyzed hemidiaphragm. In addition, thickness fraction was extremely diminished when contrasted with the non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm. CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic patients with UDP, global inspiratory strength is reduced not only due to weakness in the paralyzed hemidiaphragm but also to impairment in the pressure generated by the non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm.
Assuntos
Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagem , Diafragma/fisiopatologia , Pressão , Paralisia Respiratória/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Capacidade Residual Funcional , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nervo Frênico/fisiopatologia , Paralisia Respiratória/patologia , Ultrassonografia , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the accuracy of criteria for diagnosing pressure overassistance during pressure support ventilation. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Medical-surgical ICU. PATIENTS: Adults under mechanical ventilation for 48 hours or more using pressure support ventilation and without any sedative for 6 hours or more. Overassistance was defined as the occurrence of work of breathing less than 0.3 J/L or 10% or more of ineffective inspiratory effort. Two alternative overassistance definitions were based on the occurrence of inspiratory esophageal pressure-time product of less than 50 cm H2O s/min or esophageal occlusion pressure of less than 1.5 cm H2O. INTERVENTIONS: The pressure support was set to 20 cm H2O and decreased in 3-cm H2O steps down to 2 cm H2O. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The following parameters were evaluated to diagnose overassistance: respiratory rate, tidal volume, minute ventilation, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation, rapid shallow breathing index, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, change in esophageal pressure during inspiration, and esophageal and airway occlusion pressure. In all definitions, the respiratory rate had the greatest accuracy for diagnosing overassistance (receiver operating characteristic area = 0.92; 0.91 and 0.76 for work of breathing, pressure-time product and esophageal occlusion pressure in definition, respectively) and always with a cutoff of 17 incursions per minute. In all definitions, a respiratory rate of less than or equal to 12 confirmed overassistance (100% specificity), whereas a respiratory rate of greater than or equal to 30 excluded overassistance (100% sensitivity). CONCLUSION: A respiratory rate of 17 breaths/min is the parameter with the greatest accuracy for diagnosing overassistance. Respiratory rates of less than or equal to 12 or greater than or equal to 30 are useful clinical references to confirm or exclude pressure support overassistance.