RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of trust when adolescents search for and appraise online health information. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic search of online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and ERIC) was performed. Google Scholar and reference lists for included studies were manually searched for additional articles. Studies were included if they examined the role of trust when adolescents (in the 13- to 18-year-old age range) searched for and/or appraised online health information. Findings were synthesized using thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Four key themes were identified: adolescents generally distrust the Internet but use it anyway (subthemes were why adolescents distrust online health information; why adolescents still use online health information), adolescents use heuristics to appraise the trustworthiness of online health information (subthemes were different heuristics used by different adolescents, range of heuristics used by adolescents), adolescents trust websites more than social media or social networking sites, and adolescents' level of trust in online health information guides their actions and responses. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents often distrust health information from the Internet, but continue to use it. Adolescents are aware of the need to evaluate the trustworthiness of online health information; however, their approaches vary in sophistication. As the reach and content of the Internet expands, it is important to equip adolescents with effective eHealth literacy to assess the trustworthiness of online health information.
Assuntos
Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor , Comportamento de Busca de Informação , Internet , Confiança , Adolescente , Letramento em Saúde , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the evidence concerning whether and how adolescents search for online health information and the extent to which they appraise the credibility of information they retrieve. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic search of online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ERIC) was performed. Reference lists of included papers were searched manually for additional articles. Included were studies on whether and how adolescents searched for and appraised online health information, where adolescent participants were aged 13-18 years. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the findings. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. In line with the research questions, 2 key concepts were identified within the papers: whether and how adolescents search for online health information, and the extent to which adolescents appraise online health information. Four themes were identified regarding whether and how adolescents search for online health information: use of search engines, difficulties in selecting appropriate search strings, barriers to searching, and absence of searching. Four themes emerged concerning the extent to which adolescents appraise the credibility of online health information: evaluation based on Web site name and reputation, evaluation based on first impression of Web site, evaluation of Web site content, and absence of a sophisticated appraisal strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents are aware of the varying quality of online health information. Strategies used by individuals for searching and appraising online health information differ in their sophistication. It is important to develop resources to enhance search and appraisal skills and to collaborate with adolescents to ensure that such resources are appropriate for them.
Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor , Internet , Adolescente , Humanos , Julgamento , Psicologia do AdolescenteRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore parents' attitudes to children's participation in randomized controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of focus group discussions involving 33 parents from a pediatric teaching hospital and local school in Australia. Parents varied in age, gender, ethnicity, level of education, research experience, and child's health status. The transcribed discussions were analyzed by theme linkage using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Parents balance risks and benefits when deciding about trial participation for their child. Perceived benefits include the offer of hope, better care of their child, the opportunity to access new treatments, healthcare professionals and health information, meeting others in similar circumstances, and helping others. Perceived risks include potential side effects, being randomized to ineffective treatments, and the inconvenience of participation. The decision for trial participation is also influenced by parental factors (parents' knowledge, beliefs, and emotional responses), child factors (the child's health status and preference about participation), trial factors (the use of placebos and uncertainties of participation), and doctor factors (doctor's recommendations and communication of trial information). CONCLUSIONS: Educating parents about trials, improving communication between trialists, pediatricians, and parents, increasing incentives while decreasing inconveniences, and providing decision aids for parents may increase parents' willingness to participate in trials.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Pais , Seleção de Pacientes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pais/educação , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine pediatricians' attitudes toward children's participation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and identify possible barriers to participation. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of focus group discussions involving 16 pediatricians and 5 trainees from a pediatric teaching hospital in Australia. Doctors varied in occupation, experience, research activity, age, sex, ethnicity, and parenthood experience. A professional facilitator conducted the semistructured group discussions. The transcribed audiotapes were analyzed by theme linkage by using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Pediatricians believed parents balanced perceived gains and risks when deciding about trial participation. They thought the child's condition, parents' health beliefs and personal attributes, and the doctors' beliefs and relationship with the investigators influenced parents' attitudes. Perceived gains included professional benefits for pediatricians, improved patient care, convenience for the families and themselves, and scientific advancement. Perceived risks included inconvenience, inadequate resources, and potential harms to the patient and doctor-patient relationship. Pediatricians with previous research experience were most knowledgeable about RCTs and perceived greatest gains from trial participation. Pediatricians' personal treatment preferences hindered trial support. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that children's participation in trials will be enhanced by increasing pediatricians' awareness of RCTs through education and involvement in trials and by improving the gains-risk balance.