RESUMO
This study compared dentine demineralization induced by in vitro and in situ models, and correlated dentine surface hardness (SH), cross-sectional hardness (CSH) and mineral content by transverse microradiography (TMR). Bovine dentine specimens (n = 15/group) were demineralized in vitro with the following: MC gel (6% carboxymethylcellulose gel and 0.1 M lactic acid, pH 5.0, 14 days); buffer I (0.05 M acetic acid solution with calcium, phosphate and fluoride, pH 4.5, 7 days); buffer II (0.05 M acetic acid solution with calcium and phosphate, pH 5.0, 7 days), and TEMDP (0.05 M lactic acid with calcium, phosphate and tetraethyl methyl diphosphonate, pH 5.0, 7 days). In an in situ study, 11 volunteers wore palatal appliances containing 2 bovine dentine specimens, protected with a plastic mesh to allow biofilm development. The volunteers dripped a 20% sucrose solution on each specimen 4 times a day for 14 days. In vitro and in situ lesions were analyzed using TMR and statistically compared by ANOVA. TMR and CSH/SH were submitted to regression and correlation analysis (p < 0.05). The in situ model produced a deep lesion with a high R value, but with a thin surface layer. Regarding the in vitro models, MC gel produced only a shallow lesion, while buffers I and II as well as TEMDP induced a pronounced subsurface lesion with deep demineralization. The relationship between CSH and TMR was weak and not linear. The artificial dentine carious lesions induced by the different models differed significantly, which in turn might influence further de- and remineralization processes. Hardness analysis should not be interpreted with respect to dentine mineral loss.
Assuntos
Dentina/patologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Desmineralização do Dente/induzido quimicamente , Ácido Acético/efeitos adversos , Anatomia Transversal , Animais , Biofilmes , Soluções Tampão , Cálcio/química , Carboximetilcelulose Sódica/química , Cariogênicos/farmacologia , Cariostáticos/química , Bovinos , Placa Dentária/microbiologia , Fluoretos/química , Dureza , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Ácido Láctico/química , Microrradiografia , Minerais/análise , Organofosfonatos/química , Fosfatos/química , Sacarose/farmacologia , Desmineralização do Dente/patologiaAssuntos
Bis-Fenol A-Glicidil Metacrilato , Polimetil Metacrilato , Polimetil Metacrilato , Resinas Compostas , Resinas Compostas , Lâmpadas de Polimerização Dentária , Materiais Dentários , Materiais Dentários , Adesivos Dentinários , Adesivos Dentinários , Dureza , Metacrilatos , Processos Fotoquímicos , Polímeros , Ácidos Polimetacrílicos , Ácidos Polimetacrílicos , Poliuretanos , Poliuretanos , Autocura de Resinas Dentárias , Estresse Mecânico , Propriedades de Superfície , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
The aims of this study were: (1) to correlate surface (SH) and cross-sectional hardness (CSH) with microradiographic parameters of artificial enamel lesions; (2) to compare lesions prepared by different protocols. Fifty bovine enamel specimens were allocated by stratified randomisation according to their initial SH values to five groups and lesions produced by different methods: MC gel (methylcellulose gel/lactic acid, pH 4.6, 14 days); PA gel (polyacrylic acid/lactic acid/hydroxyapatite, pH 4.8, 16 h); MHDP (undersaturated lactate buffer/methyl diphosphonate, pH 5.0, 6 days); buffer (undersaturated acetate buffer/fluoride, pH 5.0, 16 h), and pH cycling (7 days). SH of the lesions (SH(1)) was measured. The specimens were longitudinally sectioned and transverse microradiography (TMR) and CSH measured at 10- to 220-microm depth from the surface. Overall, there was a medium correlation but non-linear and variable relationship between mineral content and radicalCSH. radicalSH(1) was weakly to moderately correlated with surface layer properties, weakly correlated with lesion depth but uncorrelated with integrated mineral loss. MHDP lesions showed the highest subsurface mineral loss, followed by pH cycling, buffer, PA gel and MC gel lesions. The conclusions were: (1) CSH, as an alternative to TMR, does not estimate mineral content very accurately, but gives information about mechanical properties of lesions; (2) SH should not be used to analyse lesions; (3) artificial caries lesions produced by the protocols differ, especially considering the method of analysis.