RESUMO
Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) gene polymorphism has been associated with an increased risk for breast cancer. IGF-1 is a key regulator of proliferation, cell differentiation and apoptosis. It has important mitogenic and anti-apoptotic activities in normal cells and in breast cancer cells, acting synergistically with estrogen to increase neoplastic cell proliferation. This review aims to present the recent finds of IGF-1 gene polymorphism and its relationship with the risk of breast cancer through following the polymorphic dinucleotide repeat cytosine-adenine (CA) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by searching in the PubMed database publications focused studies published from 2010 to 2015 related to IGF-1 gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk. A growing number of studies support an association between IGF-1 gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk with conflicting results, nevertheless elucidation of the patterns of IGF-1 gene expression may permit characterization of women at high-risk for breast cancer, as well as the development of strategies for early diagnosis and efficient treatment against the disease.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Expressão Gênica , Fator de Crescimento Insulin-Like I/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Alelos , Proliferação de Células , Repetições de Dinucleotídeos , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare bone scintigraphy (BS) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of bone metastases from breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty patients with breast cancer and bone pain were submitted to both bone scintigraphy and 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging between July 2012 and June 2013. Scintigraphy was performed following an intravenous injection of technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) around 10 days before the PET/CT scan, performed using an intravenous injection of 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose followed by whole-body computed tomography (CT) to characterize metastases by both methods. Student's t-test for paired samples was used in the comparative data analysis, with significance at p<0.05. RESULTS: CT identified 429 metastatic implants in the 20 patients, with scintigraphy showing 244 of these lesions (57%) and PET/CT showing 307 (72%); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the mean number of lesions detected per patient with the two imaging modalities (p=0.367). CONCLUSION: In the present study, no difference was found between PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases from breast cancer.