RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between medical and social environmental factors and the risk of repeating a grade in childhood leukemia survivors. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of childhood leukemia survivors, recruited through the LEA cohort (Leucémie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent [French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study for Leukemia]) in 2014. An adjusted logistic regression model was used to identify variables linked to repeating a grade after the diagnosis among the survivors, and the rates of repeating a grade were compared between the survivors and their siblings using a multilevel logistic regression model. RESULTS: The mean age at inclusion of the 855 participants was 16.2 ± 7.0 years, and the mean duration of follow-up from diagnosis to evaluation was 10.2 ± 6.2 years. After disease onset, 244 patients (28.5%) repeated a grade, with a median interval of 4 years (IQR, 2-8 years). Independent factors associated with repeating a grade were male sex (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.21-2.60), adolescence (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.63-4.48), educational support during the treatment period (OR, 3.79; 95% CI, 2.45-5.88), low parental education level (OR, 2.493; 95% CI, 1.657-3.750), and household financial difficulties (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.607-4.28). Compared with siblings, survivors were at greater risk of repeating a grade (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.48-2.35). CONCLUSIONS: The most vulnerable patients seemed to be adolescents and those with parents of low socioeconomic status. Improving the schooling career of leukemia survivors will require that the medical community more carefully consider the social status of patients.
Assuntos
Previsões , Nível de Saúde , Leucemia/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess school performance in an unselected group of childhood cancer survivors and study risk factors for impairment. STUDY DESIGN: Rates of repeating a grade were compared for patients with cancer, their siblings, and the general population. Phone questionnaires were administered to patients about the school career of their child in remission and their siblings. Responses about cancer survivors were compared with those concerning their siblings and various registries provided by the national board of education. The primary outcome was the rate of repeating a grade. RESULTS: A total of 148 children in remission with a mean age of 15 ± 5.3 years and a mean follow-up period since diagnosis of 6.3 ± 1.3 years were included. More patients than siblings repeated a grade (33% versus 21%; P = .02), with a mean delay since diagnosis of 2 years. Risk factors were an older age at diagnosis, attending a secondary school, low education level of parents, bone marrow transplantation, cerebral surgery, and physical sequelae. In multivariate analysis, risk for repeating was associated with low educational level of the father, attending secondary school at diagnosis, and requiring school-organized educational support on return to school. CONCLUSION: After cancer, repeating a grade is not an exceptional occurrence, especially for teenagers; follow-up and supportive interventions before returning to school would be beneficial.