Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 24(5): 431-436, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27812612

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE:: To identify variables and their effect size on orthodontic treatment time of Class III malocclusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS:: Forty-five Class III malocclusion cases were selected from 2008 patients' records. Clinical charts, cephalometric radiographs, and pre and posttreatment dental casts were evaluated. Age, sex, PAR index at T1 and T2, overjet, missing teeth, extractions, number of treatment phases, missed appointments, appliance breakages, and cephalometric variables SNA, SNB, ANB, Wits, SnGoGn, CoA, CoGn, IMPA, 1.PP were investigated by multiple linear regression analysis and stepwise method at p<0.05. The sample was also divided into two groups: Group 0-2 (patients who had missed two clinical appointments or less) and Group >2 (patients who missed more than 2 appointments), to detect the influence of this data on treatment time and the quality of the treatment (PAR T2). RESULTS:: Average treatment time was 30.27 months. Multiple regression analysis showed that missed appointment (R2=0.4345) and appliance breakages (R2=0.0596) are the only variables able to significantly predict treatment duration. Treatment time for patients who missed more than 2 appointments was nearly one year longer. However, no significant influence on PAR T2 was observed for those patients. CONCLUSION:: Orthodontic treatment duration in Class III patients is mainly influenced by factors related to patient compliance. Patients who missed more appointments did not show worse orthodontic finishing, but longer treatment. No occlusal, cephalometric, or demographic variable obtained before treatment was able to give some significant prediction about treatment time in Class III patients.


Assuntos
Má Oclusão Classe III de Angle/terapia , Ortodontia Corretiva/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Cefalometria , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aparelhos Ortodônticos , Cooperação do Paciente , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
J. appl. oral sci ; J. appl. oral sci;24(5): 431-436, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: lil-797973

RESUMO

ABSTRACT To improve orthodontic treatment efficiency, orthodontists must know which variables could interfere with orthodontic treatment time. Objective: To identify variables and their effect size on orthodontic treatment time of Class III malocclusion. Material and Methods: Forty-five Class III malocclusion cases were selected from 2008 patients’ records. Clinical charts, cephalometric radiographs, and pre and posttreatment dental casts were evaluated. Age, sex, PAR index at T1 and T2, overjet, missing teeth, extractions, number of treatment phases, missed appointments, appliance breakages, and cephalometric variables SNA, SNB, ANB, Wits, SnGoGn, CoA, CoGn, IMPA, 1.PP were investigated by multiple linear regression analysis and stepwise method at p<0.05. The sample was also divided into two groups: Group 0-2 (patients who had missed two clinical appointments or less) and Group >2 (patients who missed more than 2 appointments), to detect the influence of this data on treatment time and the quality of the treatment (PAR T2). Results: Average treatment time was 30.27 months. Multiple regression analysis showed that missed appointment (R2=0.4345) and appliance breakages (R2=0.0596) are the only variables able to significantly predict treatment duration. Treatment time for patients who missed more than 2 appointments was nearly one year longer. However, no significant influence on PAR T2 was observed for those patients. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment duration in Class III patients is mainly influenced by factors related to patient compliance. Patients who missed more appointments did not show worse orthodontic finishing, but longer treatment. No occlusal, cephalometric, or demographic variable obtained before treatment was able to give some significant prediction about treatment time in Class III patients.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Ortodontia Corretiva/métodos , Má Oclusão Classe III de Angle/terapia , Aparelhos Ortodônticos , Fatores de Tempo , Fatores Sexuais , Cefalometria , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Etários , Cooperação do Paciente , Resultado do Tratamento , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
3.
Arch Oral Biol ; 60(9): 1177-86, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26051559

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Indigenous people of the Xingu river present a similar tooth wear pattern, practise exclusive breast-feeding, no pacifier use, and have a large intertribal genetic distance. OBJECTIVE: To revisit the etiology of dental malocclusion features considering these population characteristics. DESIGN: Occlusion and facial features of five semi-isolated Amazon indigenous populations (n=351) were evaluated and compared to previously published data from urban Amazon people. RESULTS: Malocclusion prevalence ranged from 33.8% to 66.7%. Overall this prevalence is lower when compared to urban people mainly regarding posterior crossbite. A high intertribal diversity was found. The Arara-Laranjal village had a population with a normal face profile (98%) and a high rate of normal occlusion (66.2%), while another group from the same ethnicity presented a high prevalence of malocclusion, the highest occurrence of Class III malocclusion (32.6%) and long face (34.8%). In Pat-Krô village the population had the highest prevalence of Class II malocclusion (43.9%), convex profile (38.6%), increased overjet (36.8%) and deep bite (15.8%). Another village's population, from the same ethnicity, had a high frequency of anterior open bite (22.6%) and anterior crossbite (12.9%). The highest occurrence of bi-protrusion was found in the group with the lowest prevalence of dental crowding, and vice versa. CONCLUSIONS: Supported by previous genetic studies and given their similar environmental conditions, the high intertribal diversity of occlusal and facial features suggests that genetic factors contribute substantially to the morphology of occlusal and facial features in the indigenous groups studied. The low prevalence of posterior crossbite in the remote indigenous populations compared with urban populations may relate to prolonged breastfeeding and an absence of pacifiers in the indigenous groups.


Assuntos
Oclusão Dentária , Face/anatomia & histologia , Indígenas Sul-Americanos , Má Oclusão/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Genética Populacional , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Desgaste dos Dentes/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Angle Orthod ; 85(4): 673-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25251040

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of debris and friction of conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets before and after clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sets of three conventional and self-ligating brackets were bonded from the first molar to the first premolar in eight individuals, for a total of 16 sets per type of brackets. A passive segment of 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwire was inserted into each group of brackets. Frictional force and debris level were evaluated as received and after 8 weeks of intraoral exposure. Two-way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were applied at P < .05. RESULTS: After the intraoral exposure, there was a significant increase of debris accumulation in both systems of brackets (P < .05). However, the self-ligating brackets showed a higher amount of debris compared with the conventional brackets. The frictional force in conventional brackets was significantly higher when compared with self-ligating brackets before clinical use (P < .001). Clinical exposure for 8 weeks provided a significant increase of friction (P < .001) on both systems. In the self-ligating system, the mean of friction increase was 0.21 N (191%), while 0.52 N (47.2%) was observed for the conventional system. CONCLUSION: Self-ligating and conventional brackets, when exposed to the intraoral environment, showed a significant increase in frictional force during the sliding mechanics. Debris accumulation was higher for the self-ligating system.


Assuntos
Braquetes Ortodônticos/classificação , Adulto , Ligas Dentárias/química , Feminino , Fricção , Humanos , Masculino , Fios Ortodônticos , Aço Inoxidável/química , Estresse Mecânico , Propriedades de Superfície , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA