RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the optimal fistula mitigation strategy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. BACKGROUND: The utility of technical strategies to prevent clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) may vary by the circumstances of the anastomosis. The Fistula Risk Score (FRS) identifies a distinct high-risk cohort (FRS 7 to 10) that demonstrates substantially worse clinical outcomes. The value of various fistula mitigation strategies in these particular high-stakes cases has not been previously explored. METHODS: This multinational study included 5323 PDs performed by 62 surgeons at 17 institutions. Mitigation strategies, including both technique related (ie, pancreatogastrostomy reconstruction; dunking; tissue patches) and the use of adjuvant strategies (ie, intraperitoneal drains; anastomotic stents; prophylactic octreotide; tissue sealants), were evaluated using multivariable regression analysis and propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 522 (9.8%) PDs met high-risk FRS criteria, with an observed CR-POPF rate of 29.1%. Pancreatogastrostomy, prophylactic octreotide, and omission of externalized stents were each associated with an increased rate of CR-POPF (all P < 0.001). In a multivariable model accounting for patient, surgeon, and institutional characteristics, the use of external stents [odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.25-0.81] and the omission of prophylactic octreotide (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.78) were independently associated with decreased CR-POPF occurrence. In the propensity score matched cohort, an "optimal" mitigation strategy (ie, externalized stent and no prophylactic octreotide) was associated with a reduced rate of CR-POPF (13.2% vs 33.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The scenarios identified by the high-risk FRS zone represent challenging anastomoses associated with markedly elevated rates of fistula. Externalized stents and omission of prophylactic octreotide, in the setting of intraperitoneal drainage and pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction, provides optimal outcomes.
Assuntos
Fístula Pancreática/prevenção & controle , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Drenagem , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Octreotida/efeitos adversos , Octreotida/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , StentsRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can be increased in patients with pancreatic fistula (PF). The purpose of our study was to determine if a relationship exists between PF and tumor recurrence (both peritoneal and local) in patients after PD for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: A single-institution, retrospective analysis of 221 patients who underwent PD from January 2001 to December 2009 was conducted. Electronic charts and medical records were queried for tumor characteristics, recurrence, and complications. Presence and grading of PF was determined using the criteria of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. Data were analyzed using chi-square and Kaplan-Meier survival statistics. RESULTS: There were 114 male and 107 female patients. Mean age was 66 years (range 35 to 91 years). The vast majority (84%) of patients had stage II disease; 143 (65%) had positive lymph nodes (median 2 positive nodes; range 1 to 17 positive nodes). Pancreatic fistula developed in 23 patients (grade A, n = 9; grade B, n = 13; grade C, n = 1; 10.2%). Peritoneal recurrence was noted in 20 patients (9%). Of the 23 patients with PF, peritoneal recurrence developed in 3 (13%). Of the 198 patients without PF, peritoneal recurrence developed in 17 (10%). Local recurrence occurred in 47 patients (21%), 5 (2%) in patients with PF and 42 (21%) in those without PF (p = NS). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (p = 0.4) and overall survival (p = 0.3) for those with PF vs those without PF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PF after PD were not found to have a significant increase in local or peritoneal recurrence. Therefore, in this analysis, postoperative PF does not appear to serve as an adverse prognostic marker.