RESUMO
ABSTRACT: The objective of the study was to use a deep learning model to differentiate between benign and malignant sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer compared to radiologists' assessments.Seventy-nine women with breast cancer were enrolled and underwent lymphosonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination after subcutaneous injection of ultrasound contrast agent around their tumor to identify SLNs. Google AutoML was used to develop image classification model. Grayscale and CEUS images acquired during the ultrasound examination were uploaded with a data distribution of 80% for training/20% for testing. The performance metric used was area under precision/recall curve (AuPRC). In addition, 3 radiologists assessed SLNs as normal or abnormal based on a clinical established classification. Two-hundred seventeen SLNs were divided in 2 for model development; model 1 included all SLNs and model 2 had an equal number of benign and malignant SLNs. Validation results model 1 AuPRC 0.84 (grayscale)/0.91 (CEUS) and model 2 AuPRC 0.91 (grayscale)/0.87 (CEUS). The comparison between artificial intelligence (AI) and readers' showed statistical significant differences between all models and ultrasound modes; model 1 grayscale AI versus readers, P = 0.047, and model 1 CEUS AI versus readers, P < 0.001. Model 2 r grayscale AI versus readers, P = 0.032, and model 2 CEUS AI versus readers, P = 0.041.The interreader agreement overall result showed κ values of 0.20 for grayscale and 0.17 for CEUS.In conclusion, AutoML showed improved diagnostic performance in balance volume datasets. Radiologist performance was not influenced by the dataset's distribution.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Aprendizado Profundo , Linfonodo Sentinela , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Linfonodo Sentinela/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Radiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Ultrassonografia Mamária/métodos , Meios de Contraste , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the optimal fistula mitigation strategy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. BACKGROUND: The utility of technical strategies to prevent clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) may vary by the circumstances of the anastomosis. The Fistula Risk Score (FRS) identifies a distinct high-risk cohort (FRS 7 to 10) that demonstrates substantially worse clinical outcomes. The value of various fistula mitigation strategies in these particular high-stakes cases has not been previously explored. METHODS: This multinational study included 5323 PDs performed by 62 surgeons at 17 institutions. Mitigation strategies, including both technique related (ie, pancreatogastrostomy reconstruction; dunking; tissue patches) and the use of adjuvant strategies (ie, intraperitoneal drains; anastomotic stents; prophylactic octreotide; tissue sealants), were evaluated using multivariable regression analysis and propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 522 (9.8%) PDs met high-risk FRS criteria, with an observed CR-POPF rate of 29.1%. Pancreatogastrostomy, prophylactic octreotide, and omission of externalized stents were each associated with an increased rate of CR-POPF (all P < 0.001). In a multivariable model accounting for patient, surgeon, and institutional characteristics, the use of external stents [odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.25-0.81] and the omission of prophylactic octreotide (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.78) were independently associated with decreased CR-POPF occurrence. In the propensity score matched cohort, an "optimal" mitigation strategy (ie, externalized stent and no prophylactic octreotide) was associated with a reduced rate of CR-POPF (13.2% vs 33.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The scenarios identified by the high-risk FRS zone represent challenging anastomoses associated with markedly elevated rates of fistula. Externalized stents and omission of prophylactic octreotide, in the setting of intraperitoneal drainage and pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction, provides optimal outcomes.
Assuntos
Fístula Pancreática/prevenção & controle , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Drenagem , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Octreotida/efeitos adversos , Octreotida/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , StentsRESUMO
BACKGROUND: High oxidative stress as defined by hydroxyl and peroxyl activity is often found in the stroma of human breast cancers. Oxidative stress induces stromal catabolism, which promotes cancer aggressiveness. Stromal cells exposed to oxidative stress release catabolites such as lactate, which are up-taken by cancer cells to support mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. The transfer of catabolites between stromal and cancer cells leads to metabolic heterogeneity between these cells and increased cancer cell proliferation and reduced apoptosis in preclinical models. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant that reduces oxidative stress and reverses stromal catabolism and stromal-carcinoma cell metabolic heterogeneity, resulting in reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis of cancer cells in experimental models of breast cancer. The purpose of this clinical trial was to determine if NAC could reduce markers of stromal-cancer metabolic heterogeneity and markers of cancer cell aggressiveness in human breast cancer. METHODS: Subjects with newly diagnosed stage 0 and I breast cancer who were not going to receive neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection were treated with NAC before definitive surgery to assess intra-tumoral metabolic markers. NAC was administered once a week intravenously at a dose of 150 mg/kg and 600 mg twice daily orally on the days not receiving intravenous NAC. Histochemistry for the stromal metabolic markers monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) and caveolin-1 (CAV1) and the Ki67 proliferation assay and TUNEL apoptosis assay in carcinoma cells were performed in pre- and post-NAC specimens. RESULTS: The range of days on NAC was 14-27 and the mean was 19 days. Post-treatment biopsies showed significant decrease in stromal MCT4 and reduced Ki67 in carcinoma cells. NAC did not significantly change stromal CAV1 and carcinoma TUNEL staining. NAC was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: NAC as a single agent reduces MCT4 stromal expression, which is a marker of glycolysis in breast cancer with reduced carcinoma cell proliferation. This study suggests that modulating metabolism in the tumor microenvironment has the potential to impact breast cancer proliferation.
Assuntos
Acetilcisteína/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/tratamento farmacológico , Sequestradores de Radicais Livres/uso terapêutico , Mastectomia , Adulto , Apoptose , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/metabolismo , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Carcinoma Papilar/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Papilar/metabolismo , Carcinoma Papilar/patologia , Caveolina 1/metabolismo , Proliferação de Células , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Marcação In Situ das Extremidades Cortadas , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transportadores de Ácidos Monocarboxílicos/metabolismo , Proteínas Musculares/metabolismo , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Projetos Piloto , Células Estromais/metabolismo , Resultado do Tratamento , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can be increased in patients with pancreatic fistula (PF). The purpose of our study was to determine if a relationship exists between PF and tumor recurrence (both peritoneal and local) in patients after PD for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: A single-institution, retrospective analysis of 221 patients who underwent PD from January 2001 to December 2009 was conducted. Electronic charts and medical records were queried for tumor characteristics, recurrence, and complications. Presence and grading of PF was determined using the criteria of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. Data were analyzed using chi-square and Kaplan-Meier survival statistics. RESULTS: There were 114 male and 107 female patients. Mean age was 66 years (range 35 to 91 years). The vast majority (84%) of patients had stage II disease; 143 (65%) had positive lymph nodes (median 2 positive nodes; range 1 to 17 positive nodes). Pancreatic fistula developed in 23 patients (grade A, n = 9; grade B, n = 13; grade C, n = 1; 10.2%). Peritoneal recurrence was noted in 20 patients (9%). Of the 23 patients with PF, peritoneal recurrence developed in 3 (13%). Of the 198 patients without PF, peritoneal recurrence developed in 17 (10%). Local recurrence occurred in 47 patients (21%), 5 (2%) in patients with PF and 42 (21%) in those without PF (p = NS). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (p = 0.4) and overall survival (p = 0.3) for those with PF vs those without PF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PF after PD were not found to have a significant increase in local or peritoneal recurrence. Therefore, in this analysis, postoperative PF does not appear to serve as an adverse prognostic marker.