RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study describes contraceptive understanding, sources of information and consequences of contraceptive misunderstandings among urban, young adults. STUDY DESIGN: We used qualitative data from 16 focus groups and 53 interviews with Puerto Rican and African American men and women aged 18-25 years from Philadelphia and Hartford. We categorized and compared assertions made about all contraceptive methods' side effects, effectiveness and use using an iterative process. RESULTS: Participants considered contraceptive use worthwhile but felt that it carried risks of problematic side effects and contraceptive failure, with variation among methods. Men knew most about condoms and withdrawal and trusted both more than women. Personal or second-hand experience was the dominant source of information on contraceptive understanding. Misunderstandings about contraception affected their relationships and risk of unintended pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Contraceptive understanding is a powerful determinant of contraceptive use and limits the options perceived by young adults to prevent pregnancy. Research is needed to strengthen contraceptive counseling and outreach in ways that better leverage peer influence.
Assuntos
Anticoncepção , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Administração Cutânea , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Preservativos , Connecticut , Anticoncepção/efeitos adversos , Anticoncepção/métodos , Comportamento Contraceptivo/psicologia , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/administração & dosagem , Anticoncepcionais Orais , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Injeções , Masculino , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona , Philadelphia , Gravidez , Gravidez não Planejada , Porto Rico/etnologia , População Urbana , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Communication technology is a central feature of young people's lives, but its role in romantic and sexual relationships has not been thoroughly examined. This article describes how young adults use communication technology for partnering across relationship stages (formation, maintenance, and dissolution) and types (serious/casual), and proposes implications of usage in relationships. This study analyzed qualitative data from a five-week, prospective, coital diary method with related debriefing interviews (N = 70) of African American and Puerto Rican men and women aged 18 to 25 years in Hartford and Philadelphia. Cell phones, including calls, text messaging, and mobile Internet, were the most common forms of communication technology used for partnering goals. Participants reported using cell phones to pursue partnering goals across all relationship stages, including formation (meeting, screening, and getting to know new partners), maintaining existing relationships, and breaking up. Cell phone uses depended on the type of relationship (serious/casual) and the participants' intentions and desires. Results indicated that cell phones are an important element of communication among young adults in romantic and sexual relationships. Specific features of cell phone communication shape the process and context of partnering. Future research should explore emerging communication technologies and implications for psychosocial development, dating violence, and sexual behavior.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Telefone Celular/estatística & dados numéricos , Amor , Apego ao Objeto , Comportamento Sexual/etnologia , Parceiros Sexuais/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Porto Rico/etnologia , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
CONTEXT: Heterosexual anal sex is not uncommon in the United States, and it poses risk for STDs. However, who engages in it and why are not well understood, particularly among young adults. METHODS: In 2006-2008, data on sexual health-related topics were collected in surveys (483 respondents) and qualitative interviews (70 participants) with black and Puerto Rican 18-25-year-olds in Hartford and Philadelphia. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of survey data assessed predictors of anal sex with the most recent serious heterosexual partner. Interview transcripts were analyzed for anal sex experiences and reasons for and against engaging in this behavior. RESULTS: Some 34% of survey respondents had had anal sex; this behavior was more common with serious partners than with casual partners (22% vs. 8%). Black respondents were less likely than Puerto Ricans to report anal sex (odds ratio, 0.3); women were more likely to do so than were men (2.9). In the qualitative cohort, perceptions of anal sex as painful and unappealing were the predominant reasons for not having anal sex, whereas sexual pleasure and, in serious relationships, intimacy were the main reasons for engaging in it. Condom use during anal sex was rare and was motivated by STD or hygiene concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Heterosexual anal sex is not an infrequent behavior and should be considered in a broad sexual health context, not simply as an indicator of STD risk. Health providers should address it openly and, when appropriate, as a positive sexual and emotional experience.