RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) allows rapid pathogen identification and potentially can be used for antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST). OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the performance of the MALDI-TOF MS in assessing azole susceptibility, with reduced incubation time, by comparing the results with the reference method Broth Microdilution. METHODS: Resistant and susceptible strains of Candida (n = 15) were evaluated against fluconazole and Aspergillus (n = 15) against itraconazole and voriconazole. Strains were exposed to serial dilutions of the antifungals for 15 h. Microorganisms' protein spectra against all drug concentrations were acquired and used to generate a composite correlation index (CCI) matrix. The comparison of autocorrelations and cross-correlations between spectra facilitated by CCI was used as a similarity parameter between them, enabling the inference of a minimum profile change concentration breakpoint. Results obtained with the different AFST methods were then compared. FINDINGS: The overall agreement between methods was 91.11%. Full agreement (100%) was reached for Aspergillus against voriconazole and Candida against fluconazole, and 73.33% of agreement was obtained for Aspergillus against itraconazole. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates MALDI-TOF MS' potential as a reliable and faster alternative for AFST. More studies are necessary for method optimisation and standardisation for clinical routine application.
Assuntos
Candida , Fluconazol , Voriconazol/farmacologia , Fluconazol/farmacologia , Azóis/farmacologia , Itraconazol/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Aspergillus , LasersRESUMO
BACKGROUND Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) allows rapid pathogen identification and potentially can be used for antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST). OBJECTIVES We evaluated the performance of the MALDI-TOF MS in assessing azole susceptibility, with reduced incubation time, by comparing the results with the reference method Broth Microdilution. METHODS Resistant and susceptible strains of Candida (n = 15) were evaluated against fluconazole and Aspergillus (n = 15) against itraconazole and voriconazole. Strains were exposed to serial dilutions of the antifungals for 15 h. Microorganisms' protein spectra against all drug concentrations were acquired and used to generate a composite correlation index (CCI) matrix. The comparison of autocorrelations and cross-correlations between spectra facilitated by CCI was used as a similarity parameter between them, enabling the inference of a minimum profile change concentration breakpoint. Results obtained with the different AFST methods were then compared. FINDINGS The overall agreement between methods was 91.11%. Full agreement (100%) was reached for Aspergillus against voriconazole and Candida against fluconazole, and 73.33% of agreement was obtained for Aspergillus against itraconazole. MAIN CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates MALDI-TOF MS' potential as a reliable and faster alternative for AFST. More studies are necessary for method optimisation and standardisation for clinical routine application.
RESUMO
Azole antifungal resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus is a worldwide concern. As in most public hospitals in Brazil, antifungal susceptibility tests are not routinely performed for filamentous fungi at our institution. A 4-year retrospective azole antifungal resistance screening revealed two azole-resistant A. fumigatus clinical isolates carrying the CYP51A TR34 (34-bp tandem repeat)/L98H (change of L to H at position 98)/S297T/F495I resistance mechanism mutations, obtained from two unrelated patients. Broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing showed high MICs for itraconazole, posaconazole, and miconazole. Short tandem repeat (STR) typing analysis presented high levels of similarity between these two isolates and clinical isolates with the same mutations reported from the Netherlands, Denmark, and China, as well as environmental isolates from Taiwan. Our findings might indicate that active searching for resistant A. fumigatus is necessary. They also represent a concern considering that our hospital provides tertiary care assistance to immunocompromised patients who may be exposed to resistant environmental isolates. We also serve patients who receive prophylactic antifungal therapy or treatment for invasive fungal infections for years. In these two situations, isolates resistant to the antifungal in use may be selected within the patients themselves. We do not know the potential of this azole-resistant A. fumigatus strain to spread throughout our country. In this scenario, the impact on the epidemiology and use of antifungal drugs will significantly alter patient care, as in other parts of the world. In summary, this finding is an important contribution to alert hospital laboratories conducting routine microbiological testing to perform azole resistance surveillance and antifungal susceptibility tests of A. fumigatus isolates causing infection or colonization in patients at high risk for systemic aspergillosis.