RESUMO
PURPOSE: Implanted rectal spacers (IRS) have been developed to increase the distance between the prostate and the rectum, thus optimizing dose escalation. Cost is a disadvantage and there are still uncertainties as to their durability. We have developed an autologous fat transfer (AFT) technique to use as an IRS. We aim to present the feasibility and durability at 6 months of AFT placed immediately after the implant of the seeds in low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-five patients underwent AFT (12 were treated with primary BT, 7 with a combined primary treatment of external beam radiotherapy + BT, 16 with salvage BT). The isodose used for primary BT was 14400 cGy, 11,000 cGy after 4600 cGy of external beam radiotherapy in the combined group, and 14400 cGy for the salvage group. Patients underwent a CT scan at 1, 3, and 6 months to measure the distance between the rectum and the prostate. RESULTS: An average of 32.7 cc (20-40) of fat was transferred successfully in 100% of cases. The mean distance to the rectum at the level of the base, middle, and apex at 1 and 6 months were 11.2, 9.7, and 7.6 mm; 8.3, 8.1, and 5.9 mm, respectively. No rectal toxicity or major complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The use of fat as an IRS seems to be a valid alternative to reduce rectal toxicity after BT, achieving equivalent distances to synthetic IRS. It is feasible, safe, and the loss of distance at 6 months is small. Cost is lower than other alternatives.
Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Reto/efeitos da radiação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Autoenxertos , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Doses de Radiação , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Terapia de Salvação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Several cases of adulteration of dietary supplements with tadalafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil, or their unapproved analogues have been reported worldwide. Mainly, the presence of the latter represents a serious health risk to consumers as their efficacy and toxic effects have not been assessed and may result in unpredictable adverse effects. AIM: To investigate the suspected adulteration with synthetic phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors in a dietary supplement marketed in Argentina for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: The content of the capsules of the dietary supplement (sample A) was analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) diode-array detection. From the organic extract of sample A, a major compound was purified by column chromatography (CC). The isolated compound was identified by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) and carbon NMR (13C NMR), heteronuclear single quantum coherence, distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT 135), electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and ultraviolet, and infrared (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy) spectroscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proof of adulteration of herbal products with synthetic PDE-5 inhibitors. RESULTS: By TLC and HPLC analysis, a major compound was detected in sample A organic extract. The purification of this extract by CC led to the isolation of a pure compound which was identified according to its spectral data as (6R,12aR)-2-amino-6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1',2':1,6] pyrido [3,4-b] indole-1,4-dione or aminotadalafil. CONCLUSIONS: An unapproved PDE-5 inhibitor analogue, which was identified as aminotadalafil, has been detected in a dietary supplement. This study represents the first report in Latin America and one of the few independent studies of an adulteration with an unapproved PDE-5 inhibitor of an herbal product for ED treatment.