RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The location of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM) is one of the most relevant prognostic factors included in surgical, endovascular and radiosurgical scores. However, their characteristics according to location are seldom described. The goal of this study was to describe the clinical and angiographic characteristics of bAVM classified according to their location. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with bAVM and attending a national referral hospital during the period 2010-2020. Data regarding clinical and angiographic variables were extracted, including characteristics on nidus, arterial afferents, venous drainage and associated aneurysms. BAVM were classified in 8 groups according to their location: frontal, temporal, parieto-occipital, periventricular, deep, cerebellar, brainstem and mixed. Data distribution for each group was determined and between-group differences were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 269 bAVM (in 258 patients) were included. The most frequent location was parieto-occipital; and the least frequent, brainstem. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups for most studied variables, including: clinical presentation, functional status at admission; nidus size and density, classification according to the Spetzler-Martin, Buffalo and modified Pollock-Flickinger scales; number, diameter, origin and type of afferents; number, diameter, type and direction of venous drainage, retrograde venous flow; and presence and size of flow-related aneurysms. CONCLUSION: The clinical and angiographic differences observed between brain AVM groups allow the formulation of profiles according to their location.
Assuntos
Angiografia Cerebral , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas , Humanos , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/cirurgia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , IdosoRESUMO
Multiple brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM) are rare neurovascular lesions usually related to genetic syndromes. Its management is not well established given its rarity. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical and angiographic features of published cases and to explore their associations with treatment outcomes. We performed a literature search of published cases in Medline and the Regional Index Medici. Additional cases were searched in our single-center registry. Data on the proportions of patients and clinical and angiographic characteristics were extracted. The study outcomes were nidal instability in patients who underwent staged treatment and radiological cure in patients who underwent treatment using any treatment modality. Logistic regression models for the study outcomes were analyzed. Data on the proportions of multiple bAVM patients were summarized with meta-analyses of proportions. We included 118 patients (reported in 68 studies) from the literature and 6 cases identified in our registry. A total of 124 patients harboring 339 bAVM nidi were included in the analyses. Differences between syndromic and non-syndromic cases were observed. The logistic regression analyses showed that angiographically occult untreated bAVM was associated (OR 14.37; 95% CI 2.17 to 95.4) with nidal instability after staged treatment, and deep (OR 5.11; 95% CI 1.51 to 17.27) and eloquent (OR 3.91; 95% CI 1.22 to 12.52) locations were associated with residual disease after treatment. Inconsistent reporting of relevant data throughout the included studies undermined the planned analyses. Some prognostic factors were found to be related to the study outcomes. Study Registration: The protocol of the systematic review was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021245814.
Assuntos
Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas , Humanos , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/cirurgia , Encéfalo/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , AngiografiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stable angina pectoris is a chronic medical condition with significant impact on mortality and quality of life; it can be macrovascular or microvascular in origin. Ranolazine is a second-line anti-anginal drug approved for use in people with stable angina. However, the effects of ranolazine for people with angina are considered to be modest, with uncertain clinical relevance. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of ranolazine on cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, quality of life, acute myocardial infarction incidence, angina episodes frequency and adverse events incidence in stable angina patients, used either as monotherapy or as add-on therapy, and compared to placebo or any other anti-anginal agent. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science in February 2016, as well as regional databases and trials registers. We also screened reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the effects of ranolazine versus placebo or other anti-anginals in people with stable angina pectoris were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Estimates of treatment effects were calculated using risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD) and standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed-effect model. Where we found statistically significant heterogeneity (Chi² P < 0.10), we used a random-effects model for pooling estimates. Meta-analysis was not performed where we found considerable heterogeneity (I² ≥ 75%). We used GRADE criteria to assess evidence quality and the GRADE profiler (GRADEpro GDT) to import data from Review Manager 5.3 to create 'Summary of findings' tables. MAIN RESULTS: We included 17 RCTs (9975 participants, mean age 63.3 years). We found very limited (or no) data to inform most planned comparisons. Summary data were used to inform comparison of ranolazine versus placebo. Overall, risk of bias was assessed as unclear.For add-on ranolazine compared to placebo, no data were available to estimate cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. We found uncertainty about the effect of ranolazine on: all-cause mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.71; 3 studies, 2053 participants; low quality evidence); quality of life (any dose, SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.52; 4 studies, 1563 participants; I² = 73%; moderate quality evidence); and incidence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1000mg twice daily, RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07; 2 studies, 1509 participants; low quality evidence). Add-on ranolazine 1000 mg twice daily reduced the fervour of angina episodes (MD -0.66, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.35; 3 studies, 2004 participants; I² = 39%; moderate quality evidence) but increased the risk of non-serious adverse events (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; 3 studies, 2053 participants; moderate quality evidence).For ranolazine as monotherapy compared to placebo, we found uncertain effect on cardiovascular mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.88; 1 study, 2604 participants; low quality evidence). No data were available to estimate non-cardiovascular mortality. We also found an uncertain effect on all-cause mortality for ranolazine (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.25; 3 studies, 6249 participants; low quality evidence), quality of life (1000 mg twice daily, MD 0.28, 95% CI -1.57 to 2.13; 3 studies, 2254 participants; moderate quality evidence), non-fatal AMI incidence (any dose, RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.12; 3 studies, 2983 participants; I² = 50%; low quality evidence), and frequency of angina episodes (any dose, MD 0.08, 95% CI -0.85 to 1.01; 2 studies, 402 participants; low quality evidence). We found an increased risk for non-serious adverse events associated with ranolazine (any dose, RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.00; 3 studies, 947 participants; very low quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found very low quality evidence showing that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as monotherapy had increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo. We found low quality evidence indicating that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on the risk of cardiovascular death (for ranolazine given as monotherapy), all-cause death and non-fatal AMI, and the frequency of angina episodes (for ranolazine given as monotherapy) compared to those given placebo. Moderate quality evidence indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on quality of life compared with people who received placebo. Moderate quality evidence also indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as add-on therapy had fewer angina episodes but increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo.